What's new

Featured Al-Sisi: Any Egyptian intervention in Libya has become legal

I cant wait to see misses Sissi falling down.. :)
 
.
Mr. Boreita Moroccan foreign minister, calls for the establishment of an Arab team that will lay down a strategic vision open to the Libyan parties to settle the crisis in this country

...

Mr. Nasser Bouraita reviewed the Kingdom of Morocco's approach to the Libyan conflict, noting that this approach is based on Muslim summaries that he summarized in preserving the national cohesion of the Libyans and the territorial integrity of their country and its sovereignty over all its territories, and rejecting any concept or indication of partition in the pretext of seeking to calm the situation.

In the same context, he stressed Morocco's standing with the Arab countries in defending its territorial integrity and national sovereignty, rejecting any interference in its security or stability, and its rejection of any foreign interference in Libya, as well as rejecting non-Arab interference in the Arab region as a whole.

He added that the Kingdom, in return, welcomes any efforts or initiatives that are aimed at bringing the Libyans closer and pushing for a solution to this crisis that has lasted for nine years.

https://www.diplomatie.ma/ar/السيد-بوريطة-يدعو-لإنشاء-فريق-عربي-يتولى-وضع-تصور-إستراتيجي-منفتح-على-الأطراف-الليبية-لتسوية-الأزمة-الدائرة-في-هذا-البلد?fbclid=IwAR0UbSmTCGA25kvR-KlJEtkPNaTJ99HrcNkwAg3bOAmZr4_aZ0M9nKMo6Rc
 
.
The Council of the League of Arab States at the level of foreign ministers confirmed its full support for the Libyan political agreement signed in Skhirat in the Kingdom of Morocco between the Libyan parties on December 17, 2015


The Arab foreign ministers stressed the necessity of "commitment to the unity, sovereignty, territorial integrity, national integrity, stability, and welfare of its people and its democratic future," noting the importance of working to restore the Libyan national state and its institutions to its role in serving the Libyan people away from any external interference.

The Council of Arab Foreign Ministers recorded its total rejection of foreign interventions of any kind and source that contribute to facilitating the movement of foreign terrorist extremist fighters to Libya, as well as violating international resolutions on the arms embargo that threaten the security of the Libyan neighbors and the region.
He pointed out that a political settlement among all Libyans with their various affiliations is the only solution to restore security and stability and eliminate terrorism, expressing "grave concern" that the external military escalation exacerbates the crisis in Libya and threatens the security and stability of the region as a whole, including the Mediterranean region.

He expressed full support for the efforts of the United Nations Support Mission in Libya aimed at reaching a settlement of crises through the three tracks in light of the results of the Berlin Conference and Security Council Resolution 2510, and urged the Secretary-General of the United Nations to expedite the nomination of his special envoy in order to avoid the negative aspects of the vacuum to achieve the desired progress in All tracks.

He stressed the necessity of reaching a permanent ceasefire, and agreeing on permanent and comprehensive arrangements for its implementation and verifying commitment to it by completing the work of the track of discussions taking place within the framework of the Joint Military Committee 5 5 in Geneva under the auspices of the United Nations and the speedy return of the political solution negotiations and the completion of the implementation of the paths of the Berlin Conference in both sides. Political and economic to achieve a comprehensive settlement to the crisis, in preparation for the elections to allow the Libyan people to choose their representatives freely and move to building a civil democratic state.

The Arab foreign ministers called on the United Nations and the international community to press to compel all external parties to remove mercenaries from all Libyan lands, and to work to unify the military and security institutions in Libya within the path of a political solution, dismantling of militias, and handing over their weapons in accordance with the conclusions of the Berlin Conference.

Emphasizing the pivotal and essential role of the neighboring countries of Libya and the importance of coordination among them in efforts to end the Libyan crisis, and welcoming the closing statement issued by the meeting of the foreign ministers of the countries neighboring Libya that was held in Algeria under the patronage of His Excellency the Algerian President, Abdel Majid Taboun, on 23/1/2020. Stressing the rejection and necessity of preventing external interference, whatever its type and source, that contribute to facilitating the movement of foreign terrorist extremist fighters to Libya, as well as violating international resolutions concerned with the arms embargo, which threatens the security of the Libyan neighbors and the region.

Welcoming all international initiatives and efforts, and efforts of neighboring countries aimed at stopping military operations,and the resumption of the political process in Libya under the auspices of the United Nations and in this context welcoming the Cairo Declaration.

https://www.diplomatie.ma/ar/وزراء-الخارجية-العرب-يؤكدون-دعمهم-الكامل-لاتفاق-الصخيرات-كمرجعية-أساسية-لأية-تسوية-في-ليبيا?fbclid=IwAR3DJGAZrTW647c7UvQFOdbPLcdxL2UqGflFipxhPrukHx3-wMpplOvyssk

https://www.youm7.com/story/2020/6/...راء-الخارجية-العرب-حول-الأزمة-الليبية/4840763
 
.
The Council of the League of Arab States at the level of foreign ministers confirmed its full support for the Libyan political agreement signed in Skhirat in the Kingdom of Morocco between the Libyan parties on December 17, 2015


The Arab foreign ministers stressed the necessity of "commitment to the unity, sovereignty, territorial integrity, national integrity, stability, and welfare of its people and its democratic future," noting the importance of working to restore the Libyan national state and its institutions to its role in serving the Libyan people away from any external interference.

The Council of Arab Foreign Ministers recorded its total rejection of foreign interventions of any kind and source that contribute to facilitating the movement of foreign terrorist extremist fighters to Libya, as well as violating international resolutions on the arms embargo that threaten the security of the Libyan neighbors and the region.
He pointed out that a political settlement among all Libyans with their various affiliations is the only solution to restore security and stability and eliminate terrorism, expressing "grave concern" that the external military escalation exacerbates the crisis in Libya and threatens the security and stability of the region as a whole, including the Mediterranean region.

He expressed full support for the efforts of the United Nations Support Mission in Libya aimed at reaching a settlement of crises through the three tracks in light of the results of the Berlin Conference and Security Council Resolution 2510, and urged the Secretary-General of the United Nations to expedite the nomination of his special envoy in order to avoid the negative aspects of the vacuum to achieve the desired progress in All tracks.

He stressed the necessity of reaching a permanent ceasefire, and agreeing on permanent and comprehensive arrangements for its implementation and verifying commitment to it by completing the work of the track of discussions taking place within the framework of the Joint Military Committee 5 5 in Geneva under the auspices of the United Nations and the speedy return of the political solution negotiations and the completion of the implementation of the paths of the Berlin Conference in both sides. Political and economic to achieve a comprehensive settlement to the crisis, in preparation for the elections to allow the Libyan people to choose their representatives freely and move to building a civil democratic state.

The Arab foreign ministers called on the United Nations and the international community to press to compel all external parties to remove mercenaries from all Libyan lands, and to work to unify the military and security institutions in Libya within the path of a political solution, dismantling of militias, and handing over their weapons in accordance with the conclusions of the Berlin Conference.

Emphasizing the pivotal and essential role of the neighboring countries of Libya and the importance of coordination among them in efforts to end the Libyan crisis, and welcoming the closing statement issued by the meeting of the foreign ministers of the countries neighboring Libya that was held in Algeria under the patronage of His Excellency the Algerian President, Abdel Majid Taboun, on 23/1/2020. Stressing the rejection and necessity of preventing external interference, whatever its type and source, that contribute to facilitating the movement of foreign terrorist extremist fighters to Libya, as well as violating international resolutions concerned with the arms embargo, which threatens the security of the Libyan neighbors and the region.

Welcoming all international initiatives and efforts, and efforts of neighboring countries aimed at stopping military operations,and the resumption of the political process in Libya under the auspices of the United Nations and in this context welcoming the Cairo Declaration.

https://www.diplomatie.ma/ar/وزراء-الخارجية-العرب-يؤكدون-دعمهم-الكامل-لاتفاق-الصخيرات-كمرجعية-أساسية-لأية-تسوية-في-ليبيا?fbclid=IwAR3DJGAZrTW647c7UvQFOdbPLcdxL2UqGflFipxhPrukHx3-wMpplOvyssk

https://www.youm7.com/story/2020/6/23/ننشر-النص-الكامل-لقرار-وزراء-الخارجية-العرب-حول-الأزمة-الليبية/4840763

So more money to warlord from Arab monarchs, so he can make more new mass graves?
 
.
Algeria has agreements with Lybia including a mutual defence signed in the 70's


Really you lack history facts...It was the Turks that gave Algiers to the french..for a safe passage to Turkey..and at one time after ww1, you were occupied briefly...by the French..
No Ottoman State (Turkey) didn’t give up voluntary northern africa
Do you understand what does it mean to be defeated and sign capitulation treaty
I can understand if some north african muslims feel betrayed probably because they suffered genocide from the French Empire so they might blame turks but if you actually know the (geo)political history of 18-19th centuries then you know very well that turks couldn’t do nothing

Turkey should be supporting Houthis/Ansarullahin Yemen to put huge pressure on bu Dhabi. With over dozen missiles on Dubai stock exchange, oil refineries, the King's palaces in Abu Dhabi, and the Dubai port, UAE would've been brought to its knees. I hope Turkey takes this much needed action.
That would be interesting option but I find impossible in practice as there are recently formed islamist parties by former AK party “prominent”(i mean previous high-level officials otherwise they aren’t prominent at all at least according to majority of turks including myself) members
They will probably capitalize on sectarianism card=erdogan supporting(shia) houthis
in short he(erdogan) might lose important share of his conservative electorate that could cost him dearly in the next elections so he won’t take such dangerous risky step but Turkey can support MB in Yemen which happens to be aligned with Saudi/hadi government but against UAE-backed STC and iranian-backed houthis
Well the so called bad MB terrorists who are despised by the holy trio(Saudi UAE and Egypt) is aligned with Saudis in Yemen
What a fucking bizarre situation...

The Council of the League of Arab States at the level of foreign ministers confirmed its full support for the Libyan political agreement signed in Skhirat in the Kingdom of Morocco between the Libyan parties on December 17, 2015


The Arab foreign ministers stressed the necessity of "commitment to the unity, sovereignty, territorial integrity, national integrity, stability, and welfare of its people and its democratic future," noting the importance of working to restore the Libyan national state and its institutions to its role in serving the Libyan people away from any external interference.

The Council of Arab Foreign Ministers recorded its total rejection of foreign interventions of any kind and source that contribute to facilitating the movement of foreign terrorist extremist fighters to Libya, as well as violating international resolutions on the arms embargo that threaten the security of the Libyan neighbors and the region.
He pointed out that a political settlement among all Libyans with their various affiliations is the only solution to restore security and stability and eliminate terrorism, expressing "grave concern" that the external military escalation exacerbates the crisis in Libya and threatens the security and stability of the region as a whole, including the Mediterranean region.

He expressed full support for the efforts of the United Nations Support Mission in Libya aimed at reaching a settlement of crises through the three tracks in light of the results of the Berlin Conference and Security Council Resolution 2510, and urged the Secretary-General of the United Nations to expedite the nomination of his special envoy in order to avoid the negative aspects of the vacuum to achieve the desired progress in All tracks.

He stressed the necessity of reaching a permanent ceasefire, and agreeing on permanent and comprehensive arrangements for its implementation and verifying commitment to it by completing the work of the track of discussions taking place within the framework of the Joint Military Committee 5 5 in Geneva under the auspices of the United Nations and the speedy return of the political solution negotiations and the completion of the implementation of the paths of the Berlin Conference in both sides. Political and economic to achieve a comprehensive settlement to the crisis, in preparation for the elections to allow the Libyan people to choose their representatives freely and move to building a civil democratic state.

The Arab foreign ministers called on the United Nations and the international community to press to compel all external parties to remove mercenaries from all Libyan lands, and to work to unify the military and security institutions in Libya within the path of a political solution, dismantling of militias, and handing over their weapons in accordance with the conclusions of the Berlin Conference.

Emphasizing the pivotal and essential role of the neighboring countries of Libya and the importance of coordination among them in efforts to end the Libyan crisis, and welcoming the closing statement issued by the meeting of the foreign ministers of the countries neighboring Libya that was held in Algeria under the patronage of His Excellency the Algerian President, Abdel Majid Taboun, on 23/1/2020. Stressing the rejection and necessity of preventing external interference, whatever its type and source, that contribute to facilitating the movement of foreign terrorist extremist fighters to Libya, as well as violating international resolutions concerned with the arms embargo, which threatens the security of the Libyan neighbors and the region.

Welcoming all international initiatives and efforts, and efforts of neighboring countries aimed at stopping military operations,and the resumption of the political process in Libya under the auspices of the United Nations and in this context welcoming the Cairo Declaration.

https://www.diplomatie.ma/ar/وزراء-الخارجية-العرب-يؤكدون-دعمهم-الكامل-لاتفاق-الصخيرات-كمرجعية-أساسية-لأية-تسوية-في-ليبيا?fbclid=IwAR3DJGAZrTW647c7UvQFOdbPLcdxL2UqGflFipxhPrukHx3-wMpplOvyssk

https://www.youm7.com/story/2020/6/23/ننشر-النص-الكامل-لقرار-وزراء-الخارجية-العرب-حول-الأزمة-الليبية/4840763
 
Last edited:
. . .
Only the majority counts..and that is only Qatar..Tunisian president himself support the Cairo declaration..
Just go back a page or two to see it with the official source.. not twitter talk
Give me english source and I will believe you
By the way eha news agency is not some random media they always quote official sources

I went 1-2 pages back and all I can see is trash talk between some members
I saw your tweet about tunisian president
Well he’s right that this is interim government that should be eventually replaced by new one in free elections...
However haftar’s backers won’t agree to meaningful political settlement unless they lose the oil region+Juffra and Sirte
I have already talked about Egypt and their entry in Libya
what is your opinion???
Once I talked here with egyptian and he claimed that for Egypt the eastern border region is a national security issue and I said to him it’s ok cause Turkey doesn’t have any plans going there yet now we can hear from Egyptian president claiming Sirte as redline despite being 500 km away from Egypt-Libya border
How can they explain such military action to international community?!?!??
 
Last edited:
.
What a fucking bizarre situation...
Ali Salih the former president of Yemen and who got into office after assassinating the president before him with Saudi support controlled the coutry like 100% until the Yemenis decided Arab spring freedom, he then waned to fool them by backing down from the presidency and putting his idiot of vice president in front while he(Salih) keep running the republican guard and the army from behind the curtains, he planned to sit back and watch as Hadi fuvks things up then he would return to the throne as a savior of Yemenis, but his plan was not Saudi plan, the Saudi said to Hadi that he should forget the Houti threat for now and start with fighting the reformists of Yemen (the MBs), and stupid Hadi said OK, Salih on the other hand wanted to go back to power, Saudis refused , so he broke a deal with the houties and gave them the entire army and republican guard, that is how the houties took control over the Capital of Yemen, after that Saudi/UAE started to force the houties into giving up more and more land, meanwhile ISIS and AQAP were also gaining ground, until they too started losing it, something happened and treasonous UAE broke a deal with Iran (their defense attache went to Tehran) and the next day UAE said it would stop engagement and they started arming the southern separatist of STC and now Hadi gvt is paralyzed as he watches UAE/SA conspiring against Yemen and dividing it into two countries, it's an unbelievable series of betrayal, but, the Yemenis will free their country and eventually
 
.
Give me english source and I will believe you
By the way eha news agency is not some random media they always quote official sources

I went 1-2 pages back and all I can see is trash talk between some members
I saw your tweet about tunisian president
Well he’s right that this is interim government that should be eventually replaced by new one in free elections...
However haftar’s backers won’t agree to meaningful political settlement unless they lose the oil region+Juffra and Sirte
I have already talked about Egypt and their entry in Libya
what is your opinion???
Once I talked here with egyptian and he claimed that for Egypt the eastern border region is a national security issue and I said to him it’s ok cause Turkey doesn’t have any plans going there yet now we can hear from Egyptian president claiming Sirte as redline despite being 500 km away from Egypt-Libya border
How can they explain such military action to international community?!?!??
It is easy to explain and well documented too.. there were terrorists coming from there and crossing to Egypt..everybody knows this..so do your search too..

Did you know that the UAE and Egypt did not approve of Hafter attacking Tripoli.. but he still wanted to do it.. he was not that stupid..he got all the reinforcement of GNA coming to defend Tripoli.. and then he went back and took back Sirte almost without opposition.. so it was a good faint after all..
 
Last edited:
.
46345y.jpg


 
. .
No Ottoman State (Turkey) didn’t give up voluntary northern africa
Do you understand what does it mean to be defeated and sign capitulation treaty
I can understand if some north african muslims feel betrayed probably because they suffered genocide from the French Empire so they might blame turks but if you actually know the (geo)political history of 18-19th centuries then you know very well that turks couldn’t do nothing


That would be interesting option but I find impossible in practice as there are recently formed islamist parties by former AK party “prominent”(i mean previous high-level officials otherwise they aren’t prominent at all at least according to majority of turks including myself) members
They will probably capitalize on sectarianism card=erdogan supporting(shia) houthis
in short he(erdogan) might lose important share of his conservative electorate that could cost him dearly in the next elections so he won’t take such dangerous risky step but Turkey can support MB in Yemen which happens to be aligned with Saudi/hadi government but against UAE-backed STC and iranian-backed houthis
Well the so called bad MB terrorists who are despised by the holy trio(Saudi UAE and Egypt) is aligned with Saudis in Yemen
What a fucking bizarre situation...




Bro we need to understand the Zaydis in Yemen, which is the sect that the Houthis/Ansarullah belong to. They are much closer to the Hanafi School of Thought in Sunni Islam. Their teachings are the same as the Sunnis. Many Sunnis lump all Shia in the same camp; they aren't, and unless one studies each group of their own, it is not fair to lamb all Shia groups as one monolith group.

Turkish support to Houthis/Ansarullah would be behind the scene like Iran is doing, and it would really turn tables on anti-Turkey Gulf Arab regimes. I hope the Turkish govt considers it.



Glad to hear this news! Yippee!

Where is the Algerian vote in this summit? @Ceylal bro, can you enlighten us?
 
.
It is easy to explain and well documented too.. there were terrorists coming from there and crossing to Egypt..everybody knows this..so do your search too..

Did you know that the UAE and Egypt did not approve of Hafter attacking Tripoli.. but he still wanted to do it.. he was not that stupid..he got all the reinforcement of GNA coming to defend Tripoli.. and then he went back and took back Sirte almost without opposition.. so it was a good faint after all..
He took Sirte because the madkhali brigade (I don’t the exact term) switched sides because their leader from Saudi Arabia issued fatwa against Turkey(and GNA) that’s the real reason why Sirte fell without opposition
I know that it was Egypt who was fiercely against the failed offensive russians too were against but UAE were pushing for it actually they spent the most by far of all Haftar’s backers
Egypt can play the terrorist card but only in the eastern border region no one will believe them that they need to conquer Sirte Juffra and oil crescent region from GNA to defeat terrorism
Even today(while Sirte Juffra and oil refion under Haftar’s control) terrorists can illegally enter from eastern Libya(under Haftar’s control) to Egypt so the only logical deployment for egyptian army is in the eastern region far away from Sirte...

Bro we need to understand the Zaydis in Yemen, which is the sect that the Houthis/Ansarullah belong to. They are much closer to the Hanafi School of Thought in Sunni Islam. Their teachings are the same as the Sunnis. Many Sunnis lump all Shia in the same camp; they aren't, and unless one studies each group of their own, it is not fair to lamb all Shia groups as one monolith group.

Turkish support to Houthis/Ansarullah would be behind the scene like Iran is doing, and it would really turn tables on anti-Turkey Gulf Arab regimes. I hope the Turkish govt considers it.
Thank you for extensive explanation but my point was emphasizing political opportunism
Iran’s foreign policy is deeply disliked by turks of all ideologies/political views so the newly formed opposition parties will do propaganda against ruling party hence why I said Erdogan won’t risk such move but unofficial support to houthis might happen
 
.
Iran’s foreign policy is deeply disliked by turks of all ideologies
how they feel about our involvements in Lebanon and Yemen??
do they have any specific name calling for Iran or they just do not like our involvements and express it in their words??
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom