What's new

Akinci & Aksungur and Turkish Unmanned Fighter Aircraft Program

. .
UAVs as a standard due to their loitering times are 'long ranged'. Anka-II is being designed for more payload, hence project name 'Yüksek Faydalı Yük Kapasiteli (YFYK) İnsansız Hava Aracı'

You are right , having ANKA 2 with much heavy payload would make him a better platform for long range operations

ANKA 2 would be great maritime UAV
 
.
pd170 can still generate 140 hp at 30000 feed . this is very good.


131020171136531001081_3.jpg

It's not just a matter of engine performance drop. The air gets thinner as you go higher and the wings don't generate as much lift as well. This means we can't carry max payload for altitudes over 25000 feet, especially if we want to carry a lot of fuel for a long-endurance mission.

25000 is about 7600 meters. For example Hakkari's "rakim" is 1720 meters. That's the city center. Terrorists are often higher up on the mountains so we can assume them to be operating at around 3000 meters on average. 7600-3000 = 4600 meters maximum above ground level. Since we don't usually push our UAVs to operate at their flight ceiling in order to reduce strain and increase fuel economy, that distance is more likely 3000 meters tops, probably lower as IR/optic sensors cannot resolve very well past 2000-2500 meters.

Here's the bad news. Stinger's range is 8 km (effective 4000 meters). Igla's range is 6 km (effective 3000 meters). And I fear they will supply lots of both to YPG/PKK. :(
 
Last edited:
. . . . .
.
Agreed. But also it doesn't need to carry as many as an AC-130 does, obviously. Even a single flare can help deflect an older Stinger or Igla. Especially given how Anka's small engine doesn't produce anywhere as much heat as a jet exhaust.

Aselsan can make half or quarter-sized Flare canisters for our smaller UAVs.

http://www.aselsan.com.tr/en-us/cap...tion-systems/countermeasure-dispensing-system

27409272_1m.jpg

But, always the "but". Sensor package weight and integration.
Is the TB-2 software compatible to Aselsan Nato certified software suites ?
 
.
Agreed. But also it doesn't need to carry as many as an AC-130 does, obviously. Even a single flare can help deflect an older Stinger or Igla. Especially given how Anka's small engine doesn't produce anywhere as much heat as a jet exhaust.

Aselsan can make half or quarter-sized Flare canisters for our smaller UAVs.

http://www.aselsan.com.tr/en-us/cap...tion-systems/countermeasure-dispensing-system

27409272_1m.jpg
I am not sure how the things are going to be in UAV. For sure it will not be as complicated as that below picture but again things like the weight and size of sensors, flare dispensers and other control units and compatibility must be taken on mind.
SSM_i%C3%A7in_gorsel1.jpg
 
.
You're right @kartal1

Flare dispensers require a number of subsystems to be on board to function as designed, which would probably be too much extra weight for too little risk management. Too heavy for tactical UAVs. Chances are we can only think about these from Anka-2 on.
 
. . . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom