What's new

AJK lodges protest against converting Gilgit Baltistan into Pakistan’s province

Obviously understand the importance of having a bullwark to corner India..and with chinese insistence we also gave them a chunk of AJK and soon we will annex AJK as well..Indians can only watch in fervour...

lol we dont even want your so called AJK, Gilgit Baltisthan and whatever, Keep it be happy just dont tell that you want the Indian side also.
 
. . .
Tell me one thing? I read somewhere that GB would now get a mention in the constitution. It is already mentioned in the constitution along with FATA as autonomous region. What other mention would it get if the news is true? I remember reading about it in a newspaper couple of days ago.
It doesn't...First clause in Constitution:
1 The Republic and its territories
(1) Pakistan shall be a Federal Republic to be known as the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, hereinafter referred to as Pakistan.

1[
(2) The territories of Pakistan shall comprise:-
(a) the Provinces of 2[Balochistan] 2, the 3[Khyber Pakthunkhwa] 3, the Punjab and 4[Sindh] 4 ;
(b) the Islamabad Capital Territory, hereinafter referred to as the Federal Capital;
(c) Federally Administered Tribal Areas; and
(d) such States and territories as are or may be included in Pakistan, whether by accession or otherwise.[1]
No clear mention of GB, which was promised.
Extracts:
"The proposal would see the mountainous region mentioned by name for the first time in Pakistan’s constitution,"

"In addition to being named in the constitution, Gilgit-Baltistan would also send two lawmakers to sit in the federal parliament — though they would be given observer status only."

Source: Pakistan to upgrade the constitutional status of its northern Gilgit-Baltistan region

Now someone tell me how the heck does this hurt our stance on Kashmir issue, simply retarded.
Gilgit baltistan people despise the AJK politicians and rather be part of KPK province than become part of AJK.
Who told you that? A separate entity is a better option.
 
.
anyways Gilgit-Baltistan and AJK are ethnically diverse they don`t have anything in common

They are just making an opposition because they think the people of Gilgit-Baltistan are Inferior to them
This is really sad to hear. GB and AJK shouln't been part of Greater Kashmir at first place. Btw which one of them have more common with Pakistanis? GB and AJK don't have anything in common unlike Sindhi, Baloch, Punjabi.
 
.
It doesn't...First clause in Constitution:
1 The Republic and its territories
(1) Pakistan shall be a Federal Republic to be known as the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, hereinafter referred to as Pakistan.

1[
(2) The territories of Pakistan shall comprise:-
(a) the Provinces of 2[Balochistan] 2, the 3[Khyber Pakthunkhwa] 3, the Punjab and 4[Sindh] 4 ;
(b) the Islamabad Capital Territory, hereinafter referred to as the Federal Capital;
(c) Federally Administered Tribal Areas; and
(d) such States and territories as are or may be included in Pakistan, whether by accession or otherwise.[1]
No clear mention of GB, which was promised.
Extracts:
"The proposal would see the mountainous region mentioned by name for the first time in Pakistan’s constitution,"

"In addition to being named in the constitution, Gilgit-Baltistan would also send two lawmakers to sit in the federal parliament — though they would be given observer status only."

Source: Pakistan to upgrade the constitutional status of its northern Gilgit-Baltistan region

Now someone tell me how the heck does this hurt our stance on Kashmir issue, simply retarded.

Who told you that? A separate entity is a better option.

Yes thanks. I checked it myself right now and you are absolutely right. Point D is more about any future annexations or states like JK or AJK voting to become part of us... So you are not part of the constitution nor are you part of the independent territory of AJK nor are you like that being an independent territory.. Oh Good lord what have we done for 68 years!!!!!!!!!!

This needs to be done ASAP!!!
 
. .
anyways Gilgit-Baltistan and AJK are ethnically diverse they don`t have anything in common except a common non-Muslim ruler Dogra. They are just making an opposition because they think the people of Gilgit-Baltistan are Inferior to them

No seriously they don't. The politicians may be awkward, but the people certainly don't think anyone is inferior.

They don't like it
Gilgit baltistan people despise the AJK politicians and rather be part of KPK province than become part of AJK.

I don't think they would ever want that bro. They are horrified as to what has happened to that province i.e. infested with militant extremists who would want nothing more than to ply their trade in the Northern Areas.
 
.
No seriously they don't. The politicians may be awkward, but the people certainly don't think anyone is inferior.



I don't think they would ever want that bro. They are horrified as to what has happened to that province i.e. infested with militant extremists who would want nothing more than to ply their trade in the Northern Areas.
re joining KPK.. I am talking about the time 20+ years ago when I lived and served in that area.
point is.. they are locked out from AJK.. they dont speak their language and feel more associated with central Asians and Pashtons than the Mirs, Khawajas, Gojris and sudhans in AJK.
 
.
re joining KPK.. I am talking about the time 20+ years ago when I lived and served in that area.
point is.. they are locked out from AJK.. they dont speak their language and feel more associated with central Asians and Pashtons than the Mirs, Khawajas, Gojris and sudhans in AJK.

Yes back then if they preferred that, it would have made more sense for them.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom