Are we landing a rover? US and Russia did that in the 70s and 80s.
what the F_uk you can't compare with Russia , America . though we are most successful launcher of satellite with 95% success rate
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are we landing a rover? US and Russia did that in the 70s and 80s.
Which advance countries please name them who really ADMITTED...
what the F_uk you can't compare with Russia , America . though we are most successful launcher of satellite with 95% success rate
I know baby,,,That is not a rover, but a satellite to orbit martian orbit.![]()
which will be used to nuke who?
I know baby,,,
Rover is meant for lunar landing not on Mars.
Only for PSLV, what about GSLV and beyond? PSLV has minimal economic advantage. We aren't in the league of US, Russia, France, China or Japan.
New Recruit
1.nuclear missiles prevent wars!
2. There is a fatwa against developing nukes by Iranian clergy!
Only for PSLV, what about GSLV and beyond? PSLV has minimal economic advantage. We aren't in the league of US, Russia, France, China or Japan.
geosynchronous orbit at 36,000 kilometres is must for telecommunication satellites. GSLV failed, now the next try is on the card.
New Recruit
it's makes definitely better than China , japan ..............we should wait for china's moon mission then compare ..
it's makes definitely better than China , japan ..............we should wait for china's moon mission then compare ..
wat a poor way to support ur argument, GO ASK HIM GO ASK HER GO ASK DA CAT DA MOUSE EVERYONE ELSE BUT YOU
why da heck u wer defendin it if u cant explain ur point to us? v r ignorant ok but hey Professor Alison Wonderland atleast u shud make sense!![]()
Exactly, to land in Mars, the control system has to be autonomous to cope up with the 8 seconds lag between transmissions. We haven't achieved that kind of sophistication yet.
New Recruit