Koovie
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 20, 2012
- Messages
- 8,288
- Reaction score
- 6
LOL. You are pathetic.
Thanks for proving my point
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL. You are pathetic.
Thanks for proving my point
those who say british better than nazi
plz follow the link
Orissa famine of 1866 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
many ppl may not be knowing it , it killed 1 million ppl due to govt apathy.
Infact in Mahabharata it wasLol at syedali quoting an article blaming Bhagvat Geeta for nazi atrocities. They must remember krishna never asked Arjun to kill women and children. Shall I quote another holy book which also somehow related to terrorism these days?? Shall I? Then negative rating and banning will follow. That verse from Geeta is beyond your comprehensive power. Krishna meant whatever you do do it without attachment. Can you study properly if you think about your results all the time. Like I said you are quite hateful towards dharmic faiths and that's evident. @SarthakGanguly @wolfschanzze, @doppelganger, just look at the irony of syedali. Blaming geeta for nazi atrocities.
Hinduism is Nazism. I knew it. I wish I could promote you. A hundred like you in a country, and the country will never stand on her feet.There is an excerpt you might find interesting to read:
Slavoj Žižek, while delivering a lecture at Institute for sociology and philosophy, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, explains how SS head Heinrich Himmler used The Bhagavad Gita’s meanings to justify killings, without any moral remorse. “You need this type of a vision to enable you to do the horrors”, Zizek says. The Nazi soldiers carried out genocides, killed women and children, and committed unimaginable horrors, the problem was – how to enable the soldiers to do this ‘without becoming beasts’. In Bhagavad Gita, Arjuna has doubts while in the battlefield – ‘Do I have the right? thousands will die’, and Lord Krishna convinces him of the legitimacy of the violence he was to inflict. He explains how material realities are just appearances, true reality is the reality of your self (aatma) – “What you can destroy ‘deserves to perish’. Don’t get involved”. Zizek sees this as a good totalitarian propaganda when it’s difficult to carry out such violence. Himmler’s argument to convince soldiers suffering from pangs of conscience and ethical doubt was that - ‘most people could do great things for the country, even lay down their lives, but a true hero is the one who is ready to lose his soul for the country, to do horrible things for it. The true greatness is to elevate yourself above this temptation of ‘ordinary humanity’, true ethical greatness is when for a higher cause, you are ready to act beyond good and evil’.
It is all too relatable in the present context as we see a renewed popularity in totalitarian and fascist worldviews, be it in the form of Hindutva or Islamic fundamentalism (Islamic State et al) etc.
Lord Krishna's Gita Saar As Nazi Justification For Killing 6Mn Jews, Slavoj Žižek Explains
It is interesting to see that certain scholars have already started to compare Hindutva with Islamic fundamentalism seen with ISIS. No wonder Obama had to give a lecture to his guests on their mistreatment of minorities.
lot of people admire hitler in India... and we dont feel touchy about jews or holocust like europeans do.. it did not happen in our backyard and did not affect us directly... people still remember auranzeb as pure evil(hindus and sikhs do, muslims dont) , even though he ruled centuries ago, much before hitler.
I tried to explain that to a german tourist... who might have not only seen mein kampf sold on street, he must have seen Indians bringing hitler into conversation(but in a positive 'oh you from germany... hitler?.... err bmw? .. nice room sir do you want hotel?" ).... he was not happy with my explanation..
No, I was not absolving hitler of anything that is attributed to him, he ordered killing of his own people on industrial scale, that is infinitely evil (not attacking other countries or dropping bombs on london... nothing special about war others started when they felt)For once i agree with you........Hitler and what he did might have been bad....but he didn't kill those millions with his personal side arm....he was able to garner rave support and his nation backed him.....along with the Italians......besides, dating back from 1945, Europe has been at war for 2000 years......
The Holocaust has been blown in proportion...for self serving interests....i mean...the Japanese killed more than that in their invasion of China....but you will not find details on that in US history books.
Soviet Red Army was the one that liberated Berlin and hence Europe from the clutches of the Nazis......and the Concentration camps.....western allies were still far away.....yet for the next 45 years, we were taught that the Soviet Union is the bad guy.
What i mean to say is, i would want to read Mein Kampf and have my own opinion.....just because there is a book that Hitler authored...so it cannot be sold...that doesn't make any sense. But, we have the ignorant and idiots in large amounts.
There is nothing wrong about reading a book no matter who authored it. Problem is with finding inspirations and justifications from that book or the person who authored it for one's own fascist beliefs and actions. Hitler went on with killing tens of thousands (lets believe the holocaust was blown out of pr potion) of Jews, gypsies, disables etc in order to bring about a superior race that was not only racially but ideologically uniform. That is what Hindutvadis are after, and find inspirations and justifications from the ideology and actions of Hitler's Nazi fascism. You perhaps did not read the last paragraph:What i mean to say is, i would want to read Mein Kampf and have my own opinion.....just because there is a book that Hitler authored...so it cannot be sold...that doesn't make any sense. But, we have the ignorant and idiots in large amounts.
There is nothing wrong about reading a book no matter who authored it. Problem is with finding inspirations and justifications from that book or the person who authored it for one's own fascist beliefs and actions. Hitler went on with killing tens of thousands (lets believe the holocaust was blown out of pr potion) of Jews, gypsies, disables etc in order to bring about a superior race that was not only racially but ideologically uniform. That is what Hindutvadis are after, and find inspirations and justifications from the ideology and actions of Hitler's Nazi fascism. I hope this clears up the POV of this idiot and ignorant. Cheers mate.
Hitler's actions and their consequences for the world in general and Europe in particular have become the part of the history, and I believe (perhaps you do too) that actions speak louder than words.Fine, but i'd rather read a book written by Hitler himself so i can get into his mind, what he was thinking and why, and then piece together what happened....rather than relying on some else to do that for me. I love autobiographies for a reason.....they give me close insight into how the mind of that person works...and why he/she does what they do.
His actions and their consequences for Europe in general and the rest of the world in particular have become the part of the history, and I believe (perhaps you do too) that actions speak louder than words.