What's new

A brighter future when China and India work hand in hand

Energy is the future no doubt.... but there are just one of the few thousand things we could colabrate. Togather we would be a force that can't be ignored but devided we are two developing countries.
 
.
why dont we invite chinese investment in building our infrastructure..??they are quiet an expert in all these stuff..and that would be cost effective too as compared to japanese and korean firms.
 
.
why dont we invite chinese investment in building our infrastructure..??they are quiet an expert in all these stuff..and that would be cost effective too as compared to japanese and korean firms.

Already done:

Chinese workers fuel India's staggering infrastructure boom - Washington Post

IN CHANDANKYARI, INDIA Perched precariously on scaffolding, several Chinese workers showed Indian laborers how to weld the shell of a blast stove at a steel plant construction. Step by step, the Indians absorbed the valuable skills needed to build a large, integrated factory from scratch in record time.

Clad in blue overalls, 1,600 Chinese supervisors, technicians and other laborers work at the 2,000-acre site. The $1.7 billion factory, which also relies on Chinese technology, employs 5,000 Indian workers.

Skilled Chinese workers are helping India expand its infrastructure at a frenetic pace, even as the two Asian giants compete for economic dominance.
 
. .

Like I said, one of the many incentives for India to be friendly with China.

There are thousands other fields where we can look to increase cooperation manyfolds, energy security being one of them. I know both China & India are working on Thorium based Fast Breed reactors separately. If we can actually try to do it together, we can save lot of time & research cost. India can also take help of China in maturing our manufacturing sector, which is still in its nascant stage and rellies heavily on few very large players only.
 
.
Like I said, one of the many incentives for India to be friendly with China.

There are thousands other fields where we can look to increase cooperation manyfolds, energy security being one of them. I know both China & India are working on Thorium based Fast Breed reactors separately. If we can actually try to do it together, we can save lot of time & research cost. India can also take help of China in maturing our manufacturing sector, which is still in its nascant stage and rellies heavily on few very large players only.

Well, any cooperation is always better than no cooperation at all.

The next energy breakthrough could quite literally save this planet from running out of resources.
 
. .
The thread is so boring......

@topic, I always support india-china initiatives, target for trade should not be just $100 billion but with 2.2 billion population in india-china trade should be much much more.

With china havin some trillions in foreign reserves, and india in need of huge money, it is expected that the partnership should flourish.
It will be win win situation, because right now only india will give good returns to chinese trillions as other nations are stagnated or going into recession. Investing in developed nations is waste of money.
 
.
So you don't think that China is trying to "keep India off-balance" like Manmohan Singh said?

Good. :D

On topic: Global resources will start running out around a decade from now. There are simply not enough resources in the world, for all the "developing nations" to become "developed nations". The world cannot sustain 6-7 billion people living at a first-world standard of living.

Some countries will make it, but many others will get left behind.




That is where we all will have to be extremely inventive and create producs that give us high standard of living using the least amount of resources.
 
. .
Not again you b!tches...:disagree:

I'm assuming that you have disagreement with the thread topic and/ or the line of discussion. Why don't you express them rather then these smart one liners, which serves no other purpose then to derail threads...

:disagree:
 
.
I'm assuming that you have disagreement with the thread topic and/ or the line of discussion. Why don't you express them rather then these smart one liners, which serves no other purpose then to derail threads...

Dude this act of bhai-bhai followed by 1962,poverty,brainwashed slaves, no free media etc etc and again followed by another round of bhai-bhai looks so awkward.
 
.
Dude this act of bhai-bhai followed by 1962,poverty,brainwashed slaves, no free media etc etc and again followed by another round of bhai-bhai looks so awkward.

Who's asking to be bhai bhai.. We can never be bhai bhai & the superficial concept of Nehru itself was flawed & obsolete.

We are asking to actually IMPROVE cooperation in the field of R&D, manufacturing, energy security etc. rather then superficially shouting slogans of Bhai bhai.. That's always a no no.

Also, given the bickering that goes on (specially from Indian media), we would not be able to jump into Bhai-sara brigade.

England & France also fought bitter battles & called each other b!tches & all kind of names. But have that stopped them to increase cooperation & form an economic alliance.

China is not complaining about our limping democracy or rampant corruption, we should also keep our mouth shut for their way of governance. If their pot becomes full, it will overflow by itself.. We should not be overtly concerned about what system they choose to follow & vice-versa. Our efforts should go only into a) solving border disputes & b) co-operation in the field of R&D, manufacturing, future energy security & blocking hegemonious moves by the so called first world.

Food for thought.
 
.
^ Not talking about reality, but the cycle in this forum.
 
.
^ Not talking about reality, but the cycle in this forum.

Oh!! My mistake..

I try to hold my beliefs, regardless of what's going in these forums. The best thing that I do is not to participate in the mud slinging contests that usually goes on. Not with China, not with Pakistan or BD.. :D
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom