A brighter future when China and India work hand in hand

[ChinaToday]

Yes, buddy first they annoy us with stapled visa, when our Prime minister goes for Election Campaign in Arunachal Pradesh they cry foul, they send their soldiers to a territory which we considered our own occupied by Pakistan, they do daily incursion at border Area and their media openly declare that "India is envy of China" , they only vetoed against banning of Jamaat Ul Dawah in UNSC which later on carried terror attacks across Mumbai.

So, buddy tell us, is every fault is ours, don't they share anything??

Typical delusional indian always blame others for their own fault, you seem to forget you guys started the forward policy and housing the tibetian terrorists in your country .

 

[gpit]

... We cannot move as quickly as China when it comes to something like this. Heck, even construction of new highways has been facing similar problems.

Every political system has its pros and cons. The only wisdom needed is to leverage the good part of your system and try to alleviate/evade the bad part.

American is an example if relatively good democracy, if you consider it the result of the combination of freedom + the largest prison of the world.

Just a MHO, India needs more jails. This will likely make India a rabbit.

yes you can!

Rabbit wining over turtle is a certainty, turtle winning over rabbit is an accident. You can’t trust the fortune of a whole country on accident.

 

[gpit]

Yes, buddy first they annoy us with stapled visa, when our Prime minister goes for Election Campaign in Arunachal Pradesh they cry foul, they send their soldiers to a territory which we considered our own occupied by Pakistan, they do daily incursion at border Area and their media openly declare that "India is envy of China" , they only vetoed against banning of Jamaat Ul Dawah in UNSC which later on carried terror attacks across Mumbai.

So, buddy tell us, is every fault is ours, don't they share anything??

If you deny the fact that AP and many boarder segments are in dispute, you (India & China) have no common language.

Be sane: without finishing the boarder disputes, China's support of your UNSC, blah, blah, is void , zero.

 

[ChinaToday]

Let put it this way india needs china more than we need them. The only thing india got is a large population we can sell our goods to apart from that nothing from india we can look upon to.

 

[nalandapride]

Typical delusional indian always blame others for their own fault, you seem to forget you guys started the forward policy and housing the tibetian terrorists in your country .

Innocent Chinese you were the first Guys who built Xinjiang-Tibet highway through the disputed Aksai Chin area without informing and consulting India and created the first hostility after 1954 Panchsheel Agreement. And second thing nobody turn away 100,000 refugees and what we did every country do like that.

---------- Post added at 03:53 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:52 AM ----------

Let put it this way india needs china more than we need them. The only thing india got is a large population we can sell our goods to apart from that nothing from india we can look upon to.

Our economy is based on internal consumption, it is Chinese who need a place to dump their junk in other countries otherwise their whole export oriented economy will be ruined.

 

[nalandapride]

If you deny the fact that AP and many boarder segments are in dispute, you (India & China) have no common language.

Be sane: without finishing the boarder disputes, China's support of your UNSC, blah, blah, is void , zero.

Well election is the normal process in every state of India, it is not the time to interfere because Border talks are already going on and our PM was visiting to campaign for his Congress party in the state.

And what does Border dispute has to do with banning a terrorist organisation. There were many moment when helped Chinese too. we voted for them for their membership in WTO. At one hand they propose increasing trade to $100 Billion at the same time support anti-India terrorist group to please Pakistan.

 

[Holmes]

Let's invade Antarctica when all the snow melts due to Global Warming for Resources

 

[Sonyuke_Songpaisan]

Innocent Chinese you were the first Guys who built Xinjiang-Tibet highway through the disputed Aksai Chin area without informing and consulting India and created the first hostility after 1954 Panchsheel Agreement. And second thing nobody turn away 100,000 refugees and what we did every country do like that.

---------- Post added at 03:53 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:52 AM ----------



Our economy is based on internal consumption, it is Chinese who need a place to dump their junk in other countries otherwise their whole export oriented economy will be ruined.

Junk products for junk people. High quality products for elite people-Chinese. we Chinese just use the junks to save the junk people and improve their junk livehood quality. this is Chinese internationalism.

 

[hembo]

Let put it this way india needs china more than we need them. The only thing india got is a large population we can sell our goods to apart from that nothing from india we can look upon to.

China is a serious world power and if you really want good relations with us, you'll need to offer a serious concession. It's you guys who need good relations more than us. We are on the cusp of world superpowerdom -- our economy grew 20% (!) from 2010 to 2011 and we successfully Finlandized Taiwan -- while you guys are just starting off economically and have a loooong way to go.

Now China is at the top of the ladder looking down. If you play nice with us and give us something (Tawang) to show your good will, we can give you a helping hand to become a developed country. If you keep playing hardball with us, it would be a shame if we just decided to give the ladder a swift kick to make sure india's 1+ billion population never leaves undeveloped country status.

The choice is yours.

Well, if your govt also think with a big d!ck like what you guys portray here, I guess the current stalemate is the best solution, so that both side can keep rubbing & parading their ego..

Like I said, India & China cannot become bossom buddies overnight, but if they are serious in welcoming the asian century, both have to shed the hegemoneous & big d!ck attitude & work on mutually benefitial projects. That would have been a good start and would have benefitted entire Asian (Specifically South Asian) countries.

As far as SinoChallenger's suggestion of India to bow to its master China goes, all I can say is a wet dream... We have not accepted even the US as our master in last 60 years, China is just an infant in the, so called ladder.. So you are welcome to kick, shove, cut (or whatever you deem will make you happy) the :Ladder:... Things are not gonna change by even a hairline..

 

[KS]

....

The choice is yours.

The choice, as you put it, never will involve transfer of Indian territory to China..We aint to puny Tajikistan.

It has to be a two way deal...want Tawang..part with Aksai Chin or formalize the LAC into IB.

 

[hembo]

The choice, as you put it, never will involve transfer of Indian territory to China..We aint to puny Tajikistan.

It has to be a two way deal...want Tawang..part with Aksai Chin or formalize the LAC into IB.

As far as solution to the boundary dispute is concerned, I don't think Tawang will ever be parted from India for the baren land of Askai Chin. There are real people in tawang who identifies themselves as Indians and want to be Indians. Why will we put them away for the barren lands.

As far as Strategic importance goes, Aksai Chin is far more important to China then Tawang. So present LAC will eventually be converted to IB, IMO.

 

[KS]

As far as solution to the boundary dispute is concerned, I don't think Tawang will ever be parted from India for the baren land of Askai Chin. There are real people in tawang who identifies themselves as Indians and want to be Indians. Why will we put them away for the barren lands.

As far as Strategic importance goes, Aksai Chin is far more important to China then Tawang. So present LAC will eventually be converted to IB, IMO.

Yeah I know that. Just saying to that guy in a language he understands.

Giving over Tawang will create an incurable rift in the minds of the people in the border region that they are not considered as Indians and are expendable. No. The last border in village in Arunachal Pradesh will/should be given as any other town in the mainland and that is how we roll.

 

[SinoChallenger]

The choice, as you put it, never will involve transfer of Indian territory to China..We aint to puny Tajikistan.

It has to be a two way deal...want Tawang..part with Aksai Chin or formalize the LAC into IB.

Even Taiwan had to bow down to Beijing when it reelected its pro-China (anti-independence) party for president. Not only Tajikstan bows down. india will gets its turn too.

China is building railways to Pakistan and Nepal, where we can deploy main battle tanks directly to the subcontinent plains in wartime. From ports in Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Myanmar, we will eventually contest indian navy and bottle it up to a coast guard. You might even lose Andaman Islands. Meanwhile, we built forward airbases all along Tibetan border for air strikes and equipped them with our top J-10B fighters.

The next war will be india's 1971, when india will be split into west india and east india (Assam, Manipur). Maybe more. I actually prefer this outcome to any peace deal with india, because even with a peace deal and return of Tawang a single big india will pose problems to its neighbors again a decade later. We can't leave india in one big piece.

 

[hembo]

Even Taiwan had to bow down to Beijing when it reelected its pro-China (anti-independence) party for president. Not only Tajikstan bows down. india will gets its turn too.

China is building railways to Pakistan and Nepal, where we can deploy main battle tanks directly to the subcontinent plains in wartime. From ports in Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Myanmar, we will eventually contest indian navy and bottle it up to a coast guard. You might even lose Andaman Islands. Meanwhile, we built forward airbases all along Tibetan border for air strikes and equipped them with our top J-10B fighters.

The next war will be india's 1971, when india will be split into west india and east india (Assam, Manipur). Maybe more. I actually prefer this outcome to any peace deal with india, because even with a peace deal and return of Tawang a single big india will pose problems to its neighbors again a decade later. We can't leave india in one big piece.

Oh.. you're one of those.. Ok, carry on with the war crys...

 

[KS]

Even Taiwan had to bow down to Beijing when it reelected its pro-China (anti-independence) party for president. Not only Tajikstan bows down. india will gets its turn too.

China is building railways to Pakistan and Nepal, where we can deploy main battle tanks directly to the subcontinent plains in wartime. From ports in Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Myanmar, we will eventually contest indian navy and bottle it up to a coast guard. You might even lose Andaman Islands. Meanwhile, we built forward airbases all along Tibetan border for air strikes and equipped them with our top J-10B fighters.

The next war will be india's 1971, when india will be split into west india and east india (Assam, Manipur). Maybe more. I actually prefer this outcome to any peace deal with india, because even with a peace deal and return of Tawang a single big india will pose problems to its neighbors again a decade later. We can't leave india in one big piece.

Do you play MW III with PS or X-box ?