What's new

2002 Gujarat Riots Were Not 'Anti-Muslim', Teaches New NCERT Class XII Pol Science Textbook

They still rule it. It is being challenged but it still rules and influences a lot of people.
I see complacence. Not rage.

Nah they are being dismantled and their fear is obvious to everyone who is not blind. They hardly influence anyone except some fringe states and those states will come around too. It is the nature of cohesion and they will not be able to resist it.

I only see unforgiving rage and it is a good thing we have not exploded yet.

Unfortunately that does not show well enough yet. Civilizational issues are still pending.
Removing temples from Govt. rule even has not been done.

I think Modi is going very systematically doing things which need to be done first without getting distracted about things which can be handled without much damage latter. It is like Shivaji's campaign when he did not charge as a raging bull when the Mughals destroyed temple murtis and got entrapped. Ensuring Hindu rage is necessary as there are still parts of country which need to be freed of secular rule.
 
.
Why add such a thing in a science book? :rofl:
In a real democracy the rights of minorities are protected. When ehsan jafri called the police they refused to help and when he called modi he said "hey you aren't dead yet,I hope they kill you,let the hindus vent their anger over a so called train that caught fire"
 
.
LOL. Modi is a Hindu and he understands Hindu well being and India's well being. Which is why you are reduced to posting crap on PDF day in and day out looking for a few scraps of pity from Pakistanis.
And pity from Pakistanis gets me?

I understand that butcher of gujarat cares for your lot but he also came to understand the ground realities. He was hounded for a decade just for causing a few thousand deaths, Just imagine what shall happen for 170+ millions. So you can be keep yourself happy with those lynchings at least for now. But getting your hands on 170+ Indian muslims would be a overreach for Sanghis.

Just so you have apprehensions about someone hence required changes shouldn't be made to texts?
The same can be said about your lot. Just because it suits your agenda, you call '84 a genocide but won't attribute the same to '02
 
.
The same can be said about your lot. Just because it suits your agenda, you call '84 a genocide but won't attribute the same to '02

An unbiased person would call '84 a genocide, it's your hatred for BJP and Modi which is holding you back from acknowledging it.
 
.
The key figure, a mass murderer became the PM of India thanks to the anti Muslim massacre and we are discussing tenth grade text books? :disagree:
 
.
An unbiased person would call '84 a genocide, it's your hatred for BJP and Modi which is holding you back from acknowledging it.
I believe it was genocide but so was 2002, an unbiased person would call both as genocide but its your love for Sangh and the butcher of Gujarat which is holding you back from acknowledging it.
 
.
And pity from Pakistanis gets me?

I understand that butcher of gujarat cares for your lot but he also came to understand the ground realities. He was hounded for a decade just for causing a few thousand deaths, Just imagine what shall happen for 170+ millions. So you can be keep yourself happy with those lynchings at least for now. But getting your hands on 170+ Indian muslims would be a overreach for Sanghis.
I don't know, may be the Islamic equivalent of magic diapers.

He was hounded because the ecosystem was pro-Islam and anti-Hindu. Even then Hindus would win but it used to result in a lot of nagging. Now the ecosystem is pro-Hindu so imagine even that light weight tether is gone. Most Muslims will convert to Hinduism so it wont be 170+ millions.
 
.
I believe it was genocide but so was 2002, an unbiased person would call both as genocide but its your love for Sangh and the butcher of Gujarat which is holding you back from acknowledging it.
Nope, 2002 wasn't. No matter how unreasonable but Indira's killers had a motive whereas mob which burned down the train bogey had no reasons whatsoever, it was well planned cold blooded massacre.

Why add such a thing in a science book? :rofl:
It's POLITICAL science. But I guess in hurry to comment you forgot to read the title of the thread.
 
.
I don't know, may be the Islamic equivalent of magic diapers.

He was hounded because the ecosystem was pro-Islam and anti-Hindu. Even then Hindus would win but it used to result in a lot of nagging. Now the ecosystem is pro-Hindu so imagine even that light weight tether is gone. Most Muslims will convert to Hinduism so it wont be 170+ millions.
When you don't know, don't sh!t from your cum dump.

So the ecosystem suddenly became pro-Hindu now. Anyways carry on with your wet dreams;)

Nope, 2002 wasn't. No matter how unreasonable but Indira's killers had a motive whereas mob which burned down the train bogey had no reasons whatsoever, it was well planned cold blooded massacre.
Are we discussing cause and effect? Let me help you with the meaning of genocide.

"The deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular nation or ethnic group."

Source: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/genocide

No where does it include cause and effect.
 
.
Nah they are being dismantled and their fear is obvious to everyone who is not blind. They hardly influence anyone except some fringe states and those states will come around too. It is the nature of cohesion and they will not be able to resist it.

I only see unforgiving rage and it is a good thing we have not exploded yet.



I think Modi is going very systematically doing things which need to be done first without getting distracted about things which can be handled without much damage latter. It is like Shivaji's campaign when he did not charge as a raging bull when the Mughals destroyed temple murtis and got entrapped. Ensuring Hindu rage is necessary as there are still parts of country which need to be freed of secular rule.
I hope you are right in the end.
 
.
Why add such a thing in a science book? :rofl:
In a real democracy the rights of minorities are protected. When ehsan jafri called the police they refused to help and when he called modi he said "hey you aren't dead yet,I hope they kill you,let the hindus vent their anger over a so called train that caught fire"
The book in question is a "Political Science" textbook, and not a Science textbook.
 
.
LOL. What do you think Hindus will do when Muslims kill them with impunity? Muslims don't operate in a vacuum. They have their community's support which nurtures hatred for Hindus and provides logistics for them to the crime and then hide the culprits. Hindus don't need license of anyone to defend themselves and teach a lesson to their harassers, especially in a scenario where law and order completely fails and justice system is slave to political correctness.
We all know what Hindus do every cummu ity in India. Suffers from Hindus no other cummunity have threat from Muslims Hindus are aggressors here but we all know apne ghar ma tu kouta bhi Sher hota ha
 
.
@takeiteasy When they are done with Muslims, they will go for others.

FB_IMG_1495420359477.jpg
 
.
I believe it was genocide but so was 2002, an unbiased person would call both as genocide but its your love for Sangh and the butcher of Gujarat which is holding you back from acknowledging it.
actually we hindus are so peaceful, we suck at genocides too. we could only kill 700 of them while we lost more than 200.
next time, we wont have chaddis to mess up while chasing pregnant women, we started wearing full pants now.
 
.
2002 Gujarat Riots Were Not 'Anti-Muslim', Teaches New NCERT Class XII Pol Science Textbook


The 2002 riots which left over eight hundred Muslims dead will be simply known as 'Gujarat Riots' in Class XII political science textbooks under the National Council for Educational Research and Training (NCERT).

b549b5d6-fdcd-4583-abdf-4070a3e1bf53_1495272504.jpg


BCCL/ FILE

According to Hindustan Times, the NCERT has decide to remove the "anti-Muslim riots" reference in the revised textbooks.

The change will be made in a Class 12 textbook, published in 2007 during the UPA-I government.

000_aph2002073100872_1495272504.jpg


AFP/ FILE

In the current textbook it is mentioned under the subheading, “Anti-Muslim riots in Gujarat”, in the book’s ninth chapter titled “Politics in India since Independence”. Official estimates say about 800 Muslims and 250 Hindus were killed in the riots which were triggered by the death of 57 karsevaks returning from Ayodhya by train.

000_del452708_1495272504.jpg


AFP/ FILE

Earlier, NCERT Director Hrushikesh Senapaty had said that textbooks were not being revised and they were only reviewing the books in a systematic way.

02a15433-6dec-4e90-8504-1932fa1e2b18_1495272504.jpg


BCCL/ FILE

"Revision of books and curriculum framework is a policy decision which will be taken at the level of the HRD ministry, and it is a massive task. What we are doing right now is reviewing the books, which is to plug the gaps," he told The Times of India in a recent interview.

These books were created in 2007 and there is a lot of information that needs to be updated." NCERT said it was ready to supply books to all CBSE schools and that scarcity of books was artificially created.


http://www.indiatimes.com/news/indi...-ncert-class-xii-history-textbook-322053.html
Right.. Gujarat 2002 riots were Hindu-Muslim riots... Both Hindus and Muslims killed and got killed.... both Hindus and Muslims got punished for killing people... end of story...
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom