That is why it's called one of the worst genocides in the history of mankind.
By whom?
Nobody gives a rats @ss.
It shouldn't be a surprise even if the death toll is way more than that 1.5 million figure.
Bongas can't prove anything---All that was shown in the name of proofs was pictures of those who died in floods plus so called first hand accounts which were no more than fairy tales coming straight out of someone's "fertile" imagination.
As I said earlier, it is humanely impossible for such a small force(Posse) to eliminate so many people.
35000 men and a squardon of lightly armed F86---Guarding the border, running civil administration fighting Mukti terrorists and killing and raping at the same time---
Were your lot like sheep and cattle in a slaughterhouse getting ready to get their throats slit at an assembly line?
That number couldn't be achieved in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya combined.
That number couldn't be achieved in 8 years of Iran-Iraq war.
That number couldn't be achieved after 7 years of bloodshed in Syria.
That number couldn't be achieved in Bosnia where a real genocide happened.
But critical thinking is a trait rarely found in
sonar bangla I guess.
There were 3 Divisions and a squardon of PAF.
14th, 9th and 16th Infantry Divisions---Lack of tanks and artillery.
https://www.dawn.com/news/773291
Obviously this nonsense has been fed to the gullible Pakistani public in order to cover up their defeat in front of the brave muktibahi. Nobody is going to believe that BS number other than Pakistanis since its the only way they can soothe the pain of their humiliating surrender.
That Brave Muktibhai needed the help of some 200,000 Indian soldiers and some 11 IAF squardons to achieve their freedom despite outnumbering Pakistani forces by a great margin.
35000 pak soldiers?
Obviously this nonsense has been fed to the gullible Pakistani public in order to cover up their defeat in front of the brave muktibahi.
Nobody is going to believe that BS number other than Pakistanis since its the only way they can soothe the pain of their humiliating surrender.
Here are some typical Pakistanis
US congressman, Charles Wilson (famous for Charlie Wilson’s War) in a discussion with Pakistani diplomats in Washington DC remarked.
“……In 1971, it was certainly not possible for the 35,000 Pakistani troops in Dhaka to fight against the combined strength of 200,000 Indian army and the more than 100,000 Indian-trained Bengali guerillas.”
Another US congressman, Stephen Solarz, commenting on the War of 1971 in June 1989, remarked,
“
Pakistanis are energetic, vibrant, and resilient. We must not be misled by 1971. It was certainly not possible for the 40,000 odd Pakistani army in Dhaka to fight against much larger Indian army and Indian-trained Bengali Bahinis in a hostile territory ….”
And finally, cherry on top!
K C Pant, Indian former Defense Minister in September, 1994 during a discussion on Indo-Pak relations held in New Delhi, said
“
Peace is important between Pakistan and India. We respect the professional competence of the Pakistani soldier. Had democracy continued in Pakistan, Islamabad would not have suffered the debacle resulting in the surrender of its 40,000 military personnel to India in East Pakistan”.
But there shouldn't be any doubt about the fact that it's still miles ahead of a bottom less basket aka Pakistan
That's why your women work as maids for Arab
Sheikhs ?
That's why your women have sold their bodies in Calcutta ?
That's why your people in their millions have to travel to India for menial jobs?
That's why your pole vaulting brigade get's a mauling by BSF every now and then?
economic powerhouse, my @ss.
Now get out of this
Pakistani forum and massage your ego with misleading figures provided by your govt for local consumption.
@Desert Fox @django @Nilgiri