Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
when push comes to shove he will play the sind card.
Which is why I do not understand how April changes anything in this picture posted above.
Oh well, April, 2012 is the rumored date when the Swiss government has given its deadline to the Pakistan government to respond whether or not they want to pursue cases against Zardari. If they just sit tight till then, the cases would be dropped.
It doesn't affect the current Army - Presidency tiff, but it does say opens Zardari to live to fight another day. There would be a paradigm shift. Zardari is already touting that despite having the most cases against him none were proven - now the last few cases remaining against him would be shut down as well.
I see your point, but I submit to you that the Swiss cases, pursued or not, are not much of a change for Zardari in his struggles with the military, or with with other politicos either.
What I am hinting at is that as long as Zardari feels he will get what he came to do as President of Pakistan, he will not rock the boat, conversely the Army may be interested in rocking the boat before April to keep those cases alive. The situation we have is that the COAS can oust the President and the President can oust the Chief... There are motivating factors for each to not do anything for the most benefit than get some benefit by doing something. Cyril Almeida of Dawn described this as a Mexican Standoff at the political scale.
Unless something drastic happens (and the NATO incident is not it), both sides know Uncle Sam clearly wants a civilian set up to continue and elections to happen. They will listen to that, I am betting.
I don't think the Americans care as long as their interests are served. In the past it hasn't bothered them if it suits them, one of their best allies is Saudi where we all know there is no democracy. On the contrary America does not want true democracy in Pakistan because overwhelmingly the Pakistani people are anti American.
Yes, that is true.
However, Pakistan is such a basket case now that conventional means of doing business may no longer apply.
New Recruit
Yes, that is true.
However, Pakistan is such a basket case now that conventional means of doing business may no longer apply.
Unless something drastic happens (and the NATO incident is not it), both sides know Uncle Sam clearly wants a civilian set up to continue and elections to happen. They will listen to that, I am betting.