What's new

" writer Avijit Roy,s some blog post "

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
If you have any opinion you can express but you cannot hard someones sentiment and comment ill about religious figure .

Finding something ill is as per the perspective how you see it. The person making that comment might not find it ill and for him it might make sense, but for the blind sheeps anything different being propogated other than what they are made to believe is ill.

Okay some guys cannot agree with others does that mean you go kill? Why is it cases like this come only from Islam? Why people who follow Islam is so violent? Just cause someone say your imaginary friend had human aspects you go kill him? How does killing justify for merely hurting religious sentiment?

PS - Do not make this Hindu muslim, I abor every religion the same. I am not an atheist also I just do not believe in any religion created by man.
 
.
Yeah, go whine somewhere else, nobody will give you a 2 piece shit here. It seems like it interests Indians more about Bangladesh than Bangladeshis themselves.

I wish I could show you a middle-finger.
 
.
I wish I could show you a middle-finger.
You can shove it up your a$$.

Finding something ill is as per the perspective how you see it. The person making that comment might not find it ill and for him it might make sense, but for the blind sheeps anything different being propogated other than what they are made to believe is ill.

Okay some guys cannot agree with others does that mean you go kill? Why is it cases like this come only from Islam? Why people who follow Islam is so violent? Just cause someone say your imaginary friend had human aspects you go kill him? How does killing justify for merely hurting religious sentiment?

PS - Do not make this Hindu muslim, I abor every religion the same. I am not an atheist also I just do not believe in any religion created by man.
Yeah, that doesn't give them the right to go and insult someone or their belief. Why should we have rules that benefit the extreme minority rather than the majority? He should have been put in jail long time ago for hurting religious sentiment.

Also why can't atheists be atheist without trying to bash someone's belief? The problem is with atheism, it's a hate cult.

And if one does that (arguably), then he should be killed by the followers of faith? That's what you guys are supporting here.

Assailants hack to death writer Avijit Roy, wife injured
Nobody's supporting the killing, we are against what he did and believe just like the murder, his belief shouldn't be allowed in Bangladesh.
 
.
Some people use religion for hate although it goes against such acts. But atheism is based on hating all religion and religious people. It's a hate cult.
Those atheist nations have highest rape crimes (per 100,000) and highest number of bastards. Thus atheism is a hate, hypocritical, rapist bastard cult.

For what's worse, the Dhaka University has portrayed this guy as some kind of hero. There are less than 0.1% atheist in Bangladesh and 90% Muslims, 99.9% religious people. Time to make laws that benefit the 90% not the 0.1%. Time to ban atheism in Bangladesh.
Completely agree with you.

What about BOKO haram,Al Qaeeda,Taliban,ISIL types. Are they Athesists.
 
.
You can shove it up your a$$.


Yeah, that doesn't give them the right to go and insult someone or their belief. Why should we have rules that benefit the extreme minority rather than the majority? He should have been put in jail long time ago for hurting religious sentiment.

Also why can't atheists be atheist without trying to bash someone's belief? The problem is with atheism, it's a hate cult.


Nobody's supporting the killing, we are against what he did and believe just like the murder, his belief shouldn't be allowed in Bangladesh.

If someones religious sentiment can be hurt because of some dude on the internet then I am afraid their faith is very fragile and have to resort to killing to reinforce their faith. A faith like that is stupid. Also why do you think SOME people who follow Islam is extremely violent?
You cannot call Atheism a hate cult, cause they dont go around killing people for believing in god. When they use words its natural to react with words not violence.
 
.
What about BOKO haram,Al Qaeeda,Taliban,ISIL types. Are they Athesists.
Probably, because they aren't Muslims. Killing innocents is Haram and thus that doesn't make them Muslims.

If someones religious sentiment can be hurt because of some dude on the internet then I am afraid their faith is very fragile and have to resort to killing to reinforce their faith. A faith like that is stupid. Also why do you think SOME people who follow Islam is extremely violent?
Or maybe, we don't tolerate that. This is propaganda and thus should be treated as that.
 
.
Probably, because they aren't Muslims. Killing innocents is Haram and thus that doesn't make them Muslims.


Or maybe, we don't tolerate that. This is propaganda and thus should be treated as that.

As per my knowledge I thought Islam preaches tolerance. What do you call propaganda? Some dudes who follow extreme Islam and killing an innocent is propaganda?
 
.
As per my knowledge I thought Islam preaches tolerance. What do you call propaganda? Some dudes who follow extreme Islam and killing an innocent is propaganda?
No, spreading atheism is propaganda, wonder why a dead atheist gets more media attention that a dozen killed?
 
.
Also why can't atheists be atheist without trying to bash someone's belief? The problem is with atheism, it's a hate cult.
You are free to criticize atheist people and atheism .you can campaign against their logic by giving logic.Atheist are also free to criticize any religion like you.This is the only way to forward human civilization,To do criticism and receive criticism,upholding freedom of conscience and thought.No religious,political or any other holy figure should be above criticism,if any holy figure can't tolerate criticism then there is nothing holy about him.

Why do you want to uphold islam by suppressing criticism of it?If islam is perfect than it can overcome criticism.If you want to live in a democratic society and state then be prepare to receive criticism of your belief,your political orientation.We all have to remember that life is sacred,not the belief system.State have the responsibility to protect life irrespective of religion,political orientation,ethnicity,not the belief of any particular group of people even if they constiture majority.

Belief,religion are something that we are not all agreed upon.One man's belief is another man's blasphemy.So protecting the dominant group's belief system will only make the state tool of oppression and injustice.We all have to criticize one another's belief so that we may reach nearer the truth as you may not know the whole picture if you only exposed to the one side of argument.
 
Last edited:
.
The two nation theory had not sunken in the Bay of Bengal after-all. Glad to see Bangladeshi brothers are sensitive towards Islam and Prophet (PBUH).

That said, people cant be killed just like that.
 
.
Probably, because they aren't Muslims. Killing innocents is Haram and thus that doesn't make them Muslims.
Or maybe, we don't tolerate that. This is propaganda and thus should be treated as that.
First u r writing that atheist nations have highest rape crimes,highest number of bastards, and all that bla,bla,bla
but when it comes to hardcore barbarian extremists,u claim they r not muslims. In short,a person is a muslim if he suits you or yr style of thinking.
 
.
First u r writing that atheist nations have highest rape crimes,highest number of bastards, and all that bla,bla,bla
but when it comes to hardcore barbarian extremists,u claim they r not muslims. In short,a person is a muslim if he suits you or yr style of thinking.
Yes, they aren't Muslims, just like the one's who drink alcohol, commit adultery.

You are free to criticize atheist people and atheism .you can campaign against their logic by giving logic.Atheist are also free to criticize any religion like you.This is the only way to forward human civilization,To do criticism and receive criticism,upholding freedom of conscience and thought.No religious,political or any other holy figure should be above criticism,if any holy figure can't tolerate criticism then there is nothing holy about him.

Why do you want to uphold islam by suppressing criticism of it?If islam is perfect than it can overcome criticism.If you want to live in a democratic society and state then be prepare to receive criticism of your belief,your political orientation.We all have to remember that life is sacred,not the belief system.State have the responsibility to protect life irrespective of religion,political orientation,ethnicity,not the belief of any particular group of people even if they constiture majority.

Belief,religion are something that we are not all agreed upon.One man's belief is another man's blasphemy.So protecting the dominant group's belief system will only make the state tool of oppression and injustice.We all have to criticize one another's belief so that we may reach nearer the truth as you may not know the whole picture if you only exposed to one side of the argument.
No, Bangladesh is a country where you can practice any religion, atheism isn't a religion, it stands against all religion, thus tolerating means that you are standing against all religion.
 
.
You can shove it up your a$$.

And you pull out your head from your a$$.

Nobody's supporting the killing, we are against what he did and believe just like the murder, his belief shouldn't be allowed in Bangladesh.

Almost all Bangladeshis on pdf barring one or two are supporting or justifying such killings.

Assailants hack to death writer Avijit Roy, wife injured

What was your excuse when Prof. Shafiul Islam was murdered just three months ago in a similar manner?
 
.
These things in the OP were not actually written by him though? They were written by visitors to his site on the comments section?
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom