Your argument does not hold in a democracy. Would the US censor a map which depicted Texas as being a part of Mexico or the UK ban a map for showing N. Ireland as being part of the Republic of Ireland? I doubt it .....
Since you doubt it, why assume that it will be so?
Surely, your delusional assumptions cannot be taken as the Gospel, can it?
I find it also amusing that you are slave to the typical mentality that plagues many - that the West alone can be right and they alone are the sole custodian of all things bright and beautiful, to include Democracy.
I am not so gullible to believe they alone are human and rest are animals who have to follow their Masters to be acceptable. Do remember, the subcontinental civilisation is much much older than theirs and ideas of democracy is not something new to us.
Since you are such an adherent to the idea that the West and the
gora log alone are the custodians of all things bright and beautiful in this universe, let me give you some cold facts of the Democracy of the West that you bow in obeisance to!
Are you aware of this in the UK
Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, s.24 (1)-(3) -
Arrest without warrant for arrestable offences
The powers in relation to these types of offences are in s.24(4) - (7):
Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, s.24 (4)-(7) -
Arrest without warrant for arrestable offences
(4) Any person may arrest without a warrant -
And this of your beloved US
United States Code: Title 18871
§ 871. Threats against President and successors to the Presidency.
Even hot headed statements can sort one out!
Eg I was in on the assassination of President Kennedy and I am going to kill President Johnson in the near future. I have sold some cattle and purchased a rifle with a scope. I have written a letter to the White House today in which I told the President I would kill him. - Normand P. Michaud v. United States of America, 350 F.2d 131, July 7, 1965
Heard of the Patriot Act?
Heard of racial profiling?
I am sure the quote below will bring joy since it upholds the 'Democracy' of your beloved US of which you are so fondly ecstatic about!
What happened to Shah Rukh Khan is not an isolated incident. Since September 11, 2001 there has been a widely reported increase in racial profiling at US airports, particularly as it applies to passengers with darker complexion, “foreign sounding names,” and/or Middle Eastern or South Asian appearance. They are either forced to disembark or refused entry to a plane or detained. Their skin color, names, language and country of origin attract security personnel. Not because they are all criminals. Their “foreign marks” make them suspects. A 50-page report of the Amnesty International “Threat and Humiliation: Racial Profiling, Domestic Security, and Human Rights in the United States,” released on September 13, 2004, asserts that racial profiling in the US is pervasiveand the law enforcement uses race, religion, country of origin, or ethnic and religious appearance as a proxy for criminal suspicion. “Prior to 9/11, racial profiling was frequently referred to as ‘driving while black,’” the report noted. “Now, the practice can be more accurately characterized as driving, flying, walking, worshipping, shopping or staying at home while Black, Brown, Red, Yellow, Muslim or of Middle-Eastern appearance.”
“To question only members of one religious or ethnic community is unethical, humiliating and ineffective.”
“Your Name is Commonâ€: Racial Profiling in the US | Black Agenda Report
If that is your ideal of Democracy, then what can one say?
Maybe you should see the film - MY NAME IS KHAN!
For Christ's sake, I am sure it would not be too much of a bother if do your homework before you appear to be a PR wonder of the US and UK.
I have nothing against the UK or the US. But then, I must be excused since I do not share your fascinated awe about they being the sole custodians of civilisation!
That statement has made me very proud ... thanks for the unexpected compliment.
You amuse.
Delusional!
You are kidding right.
