Working to add India as the sixth country to NATO plus: US Congressman Ro Khanna

[MH.Yang]

No, China must take back South Tibet too, it's 100000 square KM land and it's Chinese in every respect, The inhabitants there are East Asians in descent relating to Chinese not Indians. India has no right to claim the land just as Askin Chin and Ladakh.

藏南的原住民门巴族已经只剩五十多万人其他都被印度政府替换成了印度教徒。而且门巴族更愿意独立，而不是加入中国。强行统治藏南的成本太高。
早期中国政府和印度的谈判条件都是用藏南换阿克塞钦，最近几年我们才开始要阿克塞钦加拉达克。

 

[etylo]

藏南的原住民门巴族已经只剩五十多万人其他都被印度政府替换成了印度教徒。而且门巴族更愿意独立，而不是加入中国。强行统治藏南的成本太高。
早期中国政府和印度的谈判条件都是用藏南换阿克塞钦，最近几年我们才开始要阿克塞钦加拉达克。

中国就是要抢回来，本来就是中国领土，用藏南换阿克塞钦和拉达克，阿三也绝对不同意的，他们要独吞。解决之道中国只有一个方法，彻底打服阿三，以前交通不便，夺回防守困难，现在中国可以办到。藏南土地肥沃物产富饶，不是荒芜之地，夺回之后，门巴族就想成为中国人的，把印度人赶出去就成了。印度还想霸占西藏呢，不打服阿三不成，到时一并收拾。

 

[vishwambhar]

You are overestimating China against India. This is not how foreign policy and military are being made.
India knows well where to defend and what to defend against China.
You are underestimating your own country without researching any facts.
You just need to know how India defended Bhutan territory in 2017 and Ladakh in 2020 and still...
Do you really think China has upper hand in Himalayan terrain against India?? Then think again...

100% agreed bro in fact if you read my previous posts regarding India China stand off I have always said China won't dare to launch a full fledged attack on India as terrain gives us an advantage.... I'm more worried about their economic might that allows them to drag war longer than we can and in a process capacity to exaust us......

 

[Sam6536]

No, China must take back South Tibet too, it's 100000 square KM land and it's Chinese in every respect, The inhabitants there are East Asians in descent relating to Chinese not Indians. India has no right to claim the land just as Askin Chin and Ladakh.

Both sides wants to maintain status quo for obvious reasons
a full fledged war between two bigger military powers like China and India will be devastating to say the least and this is considering a no nuke scenario. The point here is not who has bigger or better guns but the amount of damage that even a limited full fledged war will do, both countries have enough stockpiles to cause major damage.

 

[MilSpec]

In other words - prepare to be cannon fodder against the Chinese

Except, you are talking about Indians here, not gullible to fight others' wars.

 

[IblinI]

100% agreed bro in fact if you read my previous posts regarding India China stand off I have always said China won't dare to launch a full fledged attack on India as terrain gives us an advantage.... I'm more worried about their economic might that allows them to drag war longer than we can and in a process capacity to exaust us......

Dude, India isnt the center of the world, wtf are you on about thinking China would launch a full fledged attack on india.

Chinese government has 100 prior target to achieved before your bullshit theory of full fledged war against india, literally like wtf.

 

[my2cents]

Your requirements even are much higher than those of Israel.

I suggest Indians find out your position.

View attachment 865658

Why are you hiding at the bottom?

 

[SQ8]

Except, you are talking about Indians here, not gullible to fight others' wars.

Very likely to do the same that was done post 62…take the aid and weapons for China but use it for Pakistan

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

Elect a Clown, Expect a Circus.

Electing a comedian does not justify military invasion resulting in thousands of casualties. Below are other examples of Russia enraged by political independence of sovereign states (Soviet Union was Russian Empire).

Milestones: 1961–1968 - Office of the Historian

history.state.gov 3.0 shell

history.state.gov

'On August 20, 1968, the Soviet Union led Warsaw Pact troops in an invasion of Czechoslovakia to crack down on reformist trends in Prague. Although the Soviet Union’s action successfully halted the pace of reform in Czechoslovakia, it had unintended consequences for the unity of the communist bloc.'

Hungarian Revolution of 1956 - New World Encyclopedia

www.newworldencyclopedia.org

'The Hungarian Revolution of 1956 (or Hungarian Uprising of 1956)[3] was a spontaneous nationwide revolt against the Communist government of Hungary and its Soviet imposed policies, lasting from October 23 until November 10, 1956. ... On November 4, a large Soviet force invaded Budapest, killing thousands of civilians.'

 

[MilSpec]

Very likely to do the same that was done post 62…take the aid and weapons for China but use it for Pakistan

How we see it, we buy what we buy from who we choose, and deploying those systems in the most effective way to protect our interests. Tactical systems have traditionally been deployed against Pakistan because it has been a de facto military state for most of its existence. Strategic systems against China because of the asymmetry. Strategic systems like long-range missile systems are deployed against china as a deterrent in the case of stuff spills over. Given the terrain between India and china, it doesn't mandate a large deployment of tactical systems like Arty and infantry. Whereas against Pakistan, given the history of expeditionary exploits of PA, and terrain favoring conventional warfare, Arty, Infantry mech, and armor can be deployed against PA.
In addition, we can afford to pressurize Pakistan into a pseudo-arms race but we cant do that with china. So most bang for the buck is to deploy tactical systems we buy against Pakistan rather than china.
But you often seem to ignore India's firm stand towards its own interests, remember we took on Pakistan and china during the cold war, one an ally of the US and the other an ally of the soviets.

 

[fallstuff]

NATO+ like Disney+ !

 

[MH.Yang]

How we see it, we buy what we buy from who we choose, and deploying those systems in the most effective way to protect our interests. Tactical systems have traditionally been deployed against Pakistan because it has been a de facto military state for most of its existence. Strategic systems against China because of the asymmetry. Strategic systems like long-range missile systems are deployed against china as a deterrent in the case of stuff spills over. Given the terrain between India and china, it doesn't mandate a large deployment of tactical systems like Arty and infantry. Whereas against Pakistan, given the history of expeditionary exploits of PA, and terrain favoring conventional warfare, Arty, Infantry mech, and armor can be deployed against PA.
In addition, we can afford to pressurize Pakistan into a pseudo-arms race but we cant do that with china. So most bang for the buck is to deploy tactical systems we buy against Pakistan rather than china.
But you often seem to ignore India's firm stand towards its own interests, remember we took on Pakistan and china during the cold war, one an ally of the US and the other an ally of the soviets.

During the cold war, China was not an ally of the Soviet Union, but an enemy.

During most of the cold war, China was hostile to both the Soviet Union and the USA.

 

[MilSpec]

During the cold war, China was not an ally of the Soviet Union, but an enemy.

During most of the cold war, China was hostile to both the Soviet Union and the USA.

post-Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship, Alliance, and Mutual Assistance 1950, China and USSR had better engagement than India -USSR.

 

[MH.Yang]

post-Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship, Alliance, and Mutual Assistance 1950, China and USSR had better engagement than India -USSR.

In 1958, China and the Soviet Union broke off diplomatic ties. The time of friendship between the two countries is only enough to hold two Olympic Games.

 

[GamoAccu]

Nato does not want an incompetent and embarrassing ally like India.