What's new

Will Pakistan Soon Have the World’s Third-Largest Nuclear Arsenal?

Should We Pakistani Support This ?

  • Yes

    Votes: 54 83.1%
  • No

    Votes: 11 16.9%

  • Total voters
    65
you need nukes because you cannot fight with Conventional warfare.:-)

any way congrats for the NUKES:enjoy::pakistan::china:
 
.
Leave it to Gora think tanks and Pakistan be top nuke holder in few years
 
. . .
Biscuit khaye ga Biscuit ??

Hahahahahaha 2 managay ga yeh hahaha

Wow! What an achievement!

The Pakistanis should instead be proud if and when their nation is shown to be having the best health care facilities, education system and the best poverty reduction programs in the world!

This one is is being proud for all the wrong reasons! WMDs kill, not improve the quality of life!

Woh kiya hai na sedhi tikha ker lugi!! Yeh tumharay liyay hain humaray liyay CPEC hai jis say tumhari mazeed ph@^! peri hai. Abhi yeh haal hai tau CPEC kay baad kiya ho ga.

you need nukes because you cannot fight with Conventional warfare.:-)

any way congrats for the NUKES:enjoy::pakistan::china:


Great so you accept that you can't fight Nuclear Pakistan. We have all rights to defend ourselves by any mean possible and if it is 3rd biggest Nuclear stockpile then be it.
 
. .
Indians say it more like "Ärey bitwaaa, hum ko bishcuit buhut pashand haiyyy. Hum ko bishkit laa key do..."

Thats how one bihari woman in lucknow used to talk. lol.

Biharis are interesting creatures ... and the way they talk I like it very much.
 
.
Biharis are interesting creatures ... and the way they talk I like it very much.
In Pakistan biharis have lost their unique talking style in favor of the general urdu, lucknowi urdu, our urdu. We should work to preserve these cultures, not only that but try to free our lands from Indian rule.
 
. .
Pakistan doesn't have the raw materials for many more warheads, and India already has enough for 2000 at the moment
Pakistan will probably built up to the number its reserves allow, and then call it quits

the new khushab plants look they are geared towards development of more powerful hydrogen devices and associated materials

the current weapons are of relatively low yield only 10-20 kt, but if they are brought up the current level of the major powers @100-475kt ; and their numbers are at the only 200-300, this would be a world class forces

At 100-475 kt, one weapon could do as much damage as 4-5 current yield weapons, and if miniaturized, they can be made survivable.

200-300 weapons in the 100-475kt range could be a lasting deterrence force, on par with Britain, France, and China; after that its only a matter of making tunnels to hid them in, and making smaller missiles to make them more able to evade being knocked out before launch

this is basically the Chinese force, 300 weapons in 3000 km of tunnels, and small enough to be survivable
 
.
I just studies Pakistani missiles. They have only inertial guidance, no GPS guidance. It is very likely that Pakistani missiles fired towards India may end in Pakistan or some other country or sea.
go and study deeply Shaheen 3 has GPS
 
.
We don't need to worry about this development, as their nuclear warhead yield and ballistic missiles accuracy is questionable (Especially the longer ranged ones).
Their cruise missiles Babur and Ra'ad can be dangerous, but it is highly doubtful whether India and Pakistan were able to miniaturize the warhead to that extent. And even if successful, the yields would be low.


If you didn't know, that's a German World war 2 era V2 rocket.
Explain this to FOX.
 
.
It is our right to develop our nukes & mastering the technology will only make the nukes even more effective, like we are building small size nukes.
 
.
Pakistan doesn't have the raw materials for many more warheads, and India already has enough for 2000 at the moment
Pakistan will probably built up to the number its reserves allow, and then call it quits

the new khushab plants look they are geared towards development of more powerful hydrogen devices and associated materials

the current weapons are of relatively low yield only 10-20 kt, but if they are brought up the current level of the major powers @100-475kt ; and their numbers are at the only 200-300, this would be a world class forces

At 100-475 kt, one weapon could do as much damage as 4-5 current yield weapons, and if miniaturized, they can be made survivable.

200-300 weapons in the 100-475kt range could be a lasting deterrence force, on par with Britain, France, and China; after that its only a matter of making tunnels to hid them in, and making smaller missiles to make them more able to evade being knocked out before launch

this is basically the Chinese force, 300 weapons in 3000 km of tunnels, and small enough to be survivable
Dude, its all theoretical. You can't just make bombs on a computer. You need to test them. Have you? Nope!

In other words you have a nuke arsenal but how many nukes will actually work is the million dollar question. :P

Heck! Even your much vaunted Nasrs with 1-5 KT warheads haven't been tested. So don't be surprised if they turn out to be duds! :lol:
 
.
Dude, its all theoretical. You can't just make bombs on a computer. You need to test them. Have you? Nope!

In other words you have a nuke arsenal but how many nukes will actually work is the million dollar question. :P

Heck! Even your much vaunted Nasrs with 1-5 KT warheads haven't been tested. So don't be surprised if they turn out to be duds! :lol:

Its true, you cant be certain the device will work, if it hasn't been tested, but Supercomputers are being used everyday by the superpowers to test components of devices, to ensure their arsenals are still viable

Now, this is dependent on having a proven design, and just maintaining the components of that device that is known to work.

Neither India nor Pakistan successfully tested a hydrogen device in 1998.
Jeffrey Lewis • India's H Bomb Revisited

but both sides are still building up the raw materials for these types of devices. This would lead us to belive, even if they don't know they have workable designs, they are taking their chances, and both sides are gleaning as much as they can from open sources as they can.
https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/2008/MR1127part5.pdf

To Compare the Current (15kt) Weapons and those of 100-475kt range weapons is as follows
 
.
Back
Top Bottom