Why Pakistan will never own an Aircraft Carrier

[SipahSalar]

Not in need of India's 50 cent carriers anyways.
Here is an American article mocking India's aircraft carrier which mostly sits in the dock since the Indians are not smart enough to know how to fix the boiler room.
Your Aircraft Carrier Is a Piece of Crap — War Is Boring — Medium

We have only one enemy, the mushrikeen of India, and they are right next door. We can go there any day to beat them up. No need of a carrier.

And if we are ever in need of making the Indians piss their pants, we can always throw a nuke or two on their heads.

 

[21 Dec 2012]

Like I said, aircraft carriers are for use against Third World nations or those whose Navies and Air Force are poor. US will never dare to send an aircraft carrier anywhere near China or Russia if the 2 are at war.

If you have nothing but trolling to do, I believe there is an entire section for it.

Why of course. I am in complete agreement with you. USN will not send its Aircraft carrier to Russia and China. They are useless against the might of the venerable anti-ship missile.

 

[Styx]

Pakistan believes in offensive defence..

can you explain what you mean by "offensive defence" ?

there's a few videos around with the current Indian national security chief explaining it, did you mean the same thing ?

 

[Stannis Baratheon]

Why of course. I am in complete agreement with you. USN will not send its Aircraft carrier to Russia and China. They are useless against the might of the venerable anti-ship missile.

@jaiind Take a look at this.
French delete evidence US carrier was 'sunk' by sub in drill — RT USA

Another one:
The uninvited guest: Chinese sub pops up in middle of U.S. Navy exercise, leaving military chiefs red-faced | Daily Mail Online

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

can you explain what you mean by "offensive defence" ?

there's a few videos around with the current Indian national security chief explaining it, did you mean the same thing ?

In previous wars we didnt sit back n defend our territory we attacked inside india.. targetting indian bases deep inside indian mainland... our forces werent merely fighting on our borders but inside india...

Offensive Defence is a doctrine.. just like your so called cold war ...

 

[Tridibans]

We don't need an Aircraft Carrier to send a message to the idiots across the eastern border.
1998.....the message was heard LOUD and CLEAR

Lets see if any Indian calls Pakistanis as a whole as idiots and how many negative ratings he gets @Irfan Baloch

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

@jaiind Take a look at this.
French delete evidence US carrier was 'sunk' by sub in drill — RT USA

NO. 8 SQUADRON'S "MISSION IMPOSSIBLE" SUCCEEDS
1500 HOURS - 30 MAY 1995

Flying a few feet above the Arabian Sea, the two Mirage pilots are impressed by the awesome silhouette of the nuclear-powered Abraham Lincoln as the carrier looms gradually above the sea curvature, dead on the nose. The mission: To penetrate successfully the Carrier Task Force's early warning and perimeter defences and, to deliver a simulated Exocet guided missile attack on "the world's largest warship". The memorable sortie was flown during "Inspired Alert" - a Pakistan-US joint exercise. O.C. No. 8 Squadron, strictly following the ground rules, planned and led a simultaneous multidirectional attack profile against CVN-72, in an attempt to overload its defence. As two of the three Mirage pairs turned away, the lead Mirage carried out a simulated Exocet "launch" from several miles away, without meeting any of the ship's fighters. The Squadron Commander and his wingman later did a friendly fly by at the carrier's side, perhaps just as surprised as the Lincoln's crews, at the missed interception.

Wing Commander Asim Suleiman Leader and O.C. No 8 Squadron
Flight Lieutenant Ahmed Hassan Wingman

 

[Manticore]

The most important question which the OP failed to point out is if pak needs a carriers or not in the first place
Does the PN need an aircraft carrier? | Page 43
Why doesn't Pakistan build an aircraft carrier? | Page 26

 

[I S I]

Written by a "maha chutiya"..

aka Indiots

 

[jaiind]

In previous wars we didnt sit back n defend our territory we attacked inside india.. targetting indian bases deep inside indian mainland... our forces werent merely fighting on our borders but inside india...

Offensive Defence is a doctrine.. just like your so called cold war ...

lol, what was the end result you got in your previous wars??

 

[shah1398]

We have no ambitions of attacking any other country unless attacked upon and really do not need an aircraft carrier for current sea lines. Aircraft carrier symbolizes offensive ambitions. All we need at most is a long range interceptor for enhanced and sustained operations around our coastal belt.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

The most important question which the OP failed to point out is if pak needs a carriers or not in the first place
Does the PN need an aircraft carrier? | Page 43
Why doesn't Pakistan build an aircraft carrier? | Page 26

How can he? he only wanted a pat on his back...

 

[Spy Master]

Article Summary= Self Praise, whining, usual rants and blah blah blah ....

 

[Manticore]

@Manticore mate, why you had given a -ve rating for me??

I doubt that such an offtopic flame bait deserves a positive rating. You are an old member. Please show some class. I will reverse it if you edit the post on your own.

 

[Mike_Brando]

Not in need of India's 50 cent carriers anyways.
Here is an American article mocking India's aircraft carrier which mostly sits in the dock since the Indians are not smart enough to know how to fix the boiler room.
Your Aircraft Carrier Is a Piece of Crap — War Is Boring — Medium

We have only one enemy, the mushrikeen of India, and they are right next door. We can go there any day to beat them up. No need of a carrier.

And if we are ever in need of making the Indians piss their pants, we can always throw a nuke or two on their heads.

Similarly our only enemies are next door mlechchas of Pakistan,so what!!