Why do we hate the congress- My take.

[Stephen Cohen]

@FaujHistorian

Gandhi Family has Legitimised ONE FAMILY Dynastic rule

Now many parties have adopted this concept
taking the cue from the Gandhis

The BJP is an exception

Other parties have put only their second generation into politics
But the Gandhis are now into the Fourth Generation

Removing the Gandhis is a NECESSITY for India and the Congress

 

[magudi]

Now many parties have adopted this concept
taking the cue from the Gandhis

The BJP is an exception
s

A partie' s strength ultimately consists in what it can do on its own, and not in what it can borrow from others.

 

[Razia Sultana]

We have Muslim reservations in Kerala within OBCs.Correct me if i am wrong but the similar provisions exist in Karnataka,Bihar,WB,TN also so isn't that reservation ?

You are right. but it is not because of them being muslims but rather fulfilling some other criteria as per mandal commission report.

 

[FaujHistorian]

@FaujHistorian

Gandhi Family has Legitimised ONE FAMILY Dynastic rule

Now many parties have adopted this concept
taking the cue from the Gandhis

The BJP is an exception

Other parties have put only their second generation into politics
But the Gandhis are now into the Fourth Generation

Removing the Gandhis is a NECESSITY for India and the Congress

Yara. It is not Gandhi party.

Modern day poltiical parties generally are dynastic in nature. Sure there are exceptions in the West.

But in our part of the world the following types of poltiical parties exist:

1. Dynastic parties (dominate East Asia all the way to West Asia)
2. Religious parties (BJP in INdia, JI in Pak, Mullahs in Iran, IB in Egypt, Turkey) that are usual replacement of dynastic parties.
--- These can also quasi nationalist but mostly religious parties
--- Few parties who believe in "religion" of communism

3. Ethnic nationalist parties

I am not supporting any particular type. Just sharing with you the nature of political system.

 

[Stephen Cohen]

A partie' s strength ultimately consists in what it can do on its own, and not in what it can borrow from others.

You Twisted My SIgnature ; but in a Good way

Yara. It is not Gandhi party.

Modern day poltiical parties generally are dynastic in nature. Sure there are exceptions in the West.

But in our part of the world the following types of poltiical parties exist:

1. Dynastic parties (dominate East Asia all the way to West Asia)
2. Religious parties (BJP in INdia, JI in Pak, Mullahs in Iran, IB in Egypt, Turkey) that are good replacement of dynastic parties.
--- These can also quasi nationalist but mostly religious parties
--- Few parties who believe in "religion" of communism

3. Ethnic nationalist parties

I am not supporting any particular type. Just sharing with you the nature of political system.

Y

The Gandhis are a Burden to India and the Congress

FOUR generations is JUST TOO MUCH

Two Generations is OK because it takes Time for a Party to
establish itself ; and in between they loose elections

But FOUR Generations ; Not acceptable

ANYWAY ; Rahul Gandhi is a DUFFER ; He has not shown ANY potential

AND he has NO WORK experience

He wants to be the PM directly ; SUCH is the level of arrogance in The Gandhis

Their government was in power for TEN years

He could have handled different Ministries and gained valuable experience

 

[FaujHistorian]

You Twisted My SIgnature ; but in a Good way



The Gandhis are a Burden to India and the Congress

FOUR generations is JUST TOO MUCH

Two Generations is OK because it takes Time for a Party to
establish itself ; and in between they loose elections

But FOUR Generations ; Not acceptable

ANYWAY ; Rahul Gandhi is a DUFFER ; He has not shown ANY potential

AND he has NO WORK experience

He wants to be the PM directly ; SUCH is the level of arrogance in The Gandhis

Their government was in power for TEN years

He could have handled different Ministries and gained valuable experience

I don't think you even tried to understand different classes of political parties as listed in my post.

 

[magudi]

2. Religious parties (BJP in INdia, JI in Pak, Mullahs in Iran, IB in Egypt, Turkey) that are good replacement of dynastic parties.

BJP is not the only party that plays on religious identity in india my fauji - wherever there is significant minority population we have parties like Muslim legue,AIMIM,AIUDF etc.Also there are numerous equivalent of RSS for Muslims like PFI so its not all evil Hindoos oppressing secular Muslims as you think

 

[FaujHistorian]

BJP is not the only party that plays on religious identity in india my fauji - wherever there is significant minority population we have parties like Muslim legue,AIMIM,AIUDF etc.Also there are numerous equivalent of RSS for Muslims like PFI so its not all evil Hindoos oppressing secular Muslims as you think

Sure.

I only listed national level parties.

if you look at the list in my post, it is not focused on HINDOOOOOOOS opppressing anyone. Instead it compared national level parties from East Asia all the way to West Asia. That's all.

Let's just talk about the nature of parties.

Thanks.

 

[Grevion]

I do not consider them as an ideology. Name any part in India except for Shiv Sena and BJP, all follow same congress ideology under different name. Samajwad is nothing but socialism which is foundation of congress ideology.

CPI have a different ideologyso does the AIMIM. Samajwadi Party emerged from the janta dal which was formed by the merger of those who once were janta party, bharatiya jana sangh was also a fraction of janta party but they didn't join janta dal.

 

[Grevion]

When I see modern educated Hindu Bharatis' world view.

I realize that the idea of Congress has failed.

In the long run, secularism too is obsolete. As both Congress and secularism do not jibe with the dominant Hindu majority anymore.

I see BJP / RSS ruling Delhi ruling for a long long time (with small insignificant periods of non BJP winners).



Peace



Off course Congress could have been managed better.

But it is not just the leadership. The very ideals of Congress are obsolete.

Congress ruled the country for 40 years since independence which means that people believed in what congress once promised during independence but when they failed to deliver and start using the ideals which were meant to bring change in Indian society for their own political gain people started looking for some other options while many continued believing in congress.
Most of the Indians(hindus+muslims+all the other minorties) still believe in secularism and rejects any ideals which causes stiffness between the communities but we also stopped believing in false propaganda.

 

[Kashmiri Pandit]

I hate Congress for many reasons and some of them even I don't know . They are crappy party and think of themselves as Elites of India . A common man in India is many times better in thinking than Congress people .

When Most of their Spokesperson speak , The fire in me that is raging to burn them raises to a higher degree .

 

[Grevion]

I hate Congress for many reasons and some of them even I don't know . They are crappy party and think of themselves as Elites of India . A common man in India is many times better in thinking than Congress people .

When Most of their Spokesperson speak , The fire in me that is raging to burn them raises to a higher degree .

UPA 2 was the most ignorant govt. I have ever seen, with the likes of Kapil Sibble and Ambika Soni and the kind of statement they used to gave and also the way they managed Ramlila Maidan incident and India against corruption movement.

 

[Kashmiri Pandit]

UPA 2 was the most ignorant govt. I have ever seen, with the likes of Kapil Sibble and Ambika Soni and the kind of statement they used to gave and also the way they managed Ramlila Maidan incident and India against corruption movement.

When I first started taking interest in Nation Developing , India was under UPA 1 . I liked them . Hell , Most of the people I hate now , were the ones I liked . Under UPA 2 , I went totally against them . Their attitude was Chori uppar sai Seena Jori .
That is when , I heard about Modi ji and by the time his 2014 election speeches started , he became my saviour .

I am with anyone who is Pro India ( Socially , Politically and Economically ) .

 

[Grevion]

When I first started taking interest in Nation Developing , India was under UPA 1 . I liked them . Hell , Most of the people I hate now , were the ones I liked . Under UPA 2 , I went totally against them . Their attitude was Chori uppar sai Seena Jori .
That is when , I heard about Modi ji and by the time his 2014 election speeches started , he became my saviour .

I am with anyone who is Pro India ( Socially , Politically and Economically ) .

UPA 2 was possible because of the success of UPA 1(mostly economic) and also because NDA didn't had any strong ans. to it. UPA 2 became a different story altogether and is one of the very strong reason for the congress 44 seats in the parliament down from 206.

 

[Kashmiri Pandit]

UPA 2 was possible because of the success of UPA 1(mostly economic) and also because NDA didn't had any strong ans. to it. UPA 2 became a different story altogether and is one of the very strong reason for the congress 44 seats in the parliament down from 206.

Yup !