What's new

Why Chennai can't and won't speak Hindi

.
Did you even bother to read the article that you've quoted? It clearly busts the myth that Aryans and Dravidians are two different races. Dravidians, as repeatedly told before, refer to all people who live in the southern reaches of peninsular India. They too came from Africa to Arabia/Central Asia to North India and finally into Southern India. Only that they were part of an earlier migration of humans into India while the so called Aryan tribes were a much later entrant.

All Indians are basically a mixture of Australoid and Caucasoid race groupings(with Mongoloid mixture in the Northeast and Ladakh regions).

But the first settlers are in South not in North.
 
.
as per the Hindu text - Rig veda Aryans are the noble followers of their gods Indra / Agni who fought the dark skinned (Dravidian) Dasyu (slaves) , enemies of Aryans

Rig veda hymn

Dasyu word never referred to Dravidians, but the Iranic rivals in the North-West, it wasn't about color of the skin. Even the Greeks were referred as non-Aryans when Alexander invaded India.
 
.
- `The initial settlement took place 65,000 years ago in the Andamans and in ancient south India around the same time, which led to population growth in this part,''

- `At a later stage, 40,000 years ago, the ancient north Indians emerged which in turn led to rise in numbers here.

-
Between 135,000 and 75,000 years ago, the East-African droughts shrunk the water volume of the lake Malawi by at least 95%, causing migration out of Africa. Which route did they take? Researchers say their study of the tribes of Andaman and Nicobar islands using complete mitochondrial DNA sequences and its comparison those of world populations has led to the theory of a ``southern coastal route'' of migration from East Africa through India.

This finding is against the prevailing view of a northern route of migration via Middle East,

So so called dradvidians are first settlers..though they mixed in some range.

Why are you manipulating the facts presented in that article? The Northern route of migration means the Africa-Arabia-Europe-S.E.Asia-India route. The Southern route means Africa-Arabia-India(along the coast all the way into Burma)-S.E.Asia-Australia.

The Andamans were populated by the same people who also populated South India. But while the Andamanese have remained isolated and hence have preserved their Australoid features, all mainland Indians have interbred with Caucasoid groups. Now, how do you classify a Dravidian then? Is it based on geography or physical features?
 
. .
@Sriram.

u r the one saying don't learn hindi.

ofcourse why would anyone want to learn hindi...
@Sriram.

u r the one saying don't learn hindi.


Yes because u were telling my ego is stopping tamils from learning hindi and preventing them from becoming great construction site workers and that im forcing english on them to become just white collar workers
 
.
But the first settlers are in South not in North.

The first settlers are from 60000 years ago. The first Caucasoid groups have arrived around 40000 years ago. The interbreeding has been practiced for at least 20000 years. How old is our civilization in comparison??? At max, it's 6000 years old, by which time everyone on mainland India had acquired a genetic admixture. The intermingling has since been restricted for 2000 years now on the basis of a rigid caste system.
 
.
Guys See what Our Indian Constitution says about Hindi in Tamilnadu


The Official Languages (Use for Official Purpose of the Union)

RULES, 1976
(As Amended, 1987, 2007, 2011)

G.S.R 1052 - In exercise of the powers conferred by section 8, read with sub-section(4) of section 3 of the Official Languages Act, 1963 (19 of 1963), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules, namely ;

1. Short title, extent and commencement -

(i) These rules may be called the Official Languages (Use for Official Purposes of the Union) Rules, 1976.

(ii) They shall extend to the whole of India, except the State of Tamilnadu.

(iii) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.


Link: राजभाषा
 
.
as per the Hindu text - Rig veda Aryans are the noble followers of their gods Indra / Agni who fought the dark skinned (Dravidian) Dasyu (meant to be Aryan slaves) , enemies of Aryans

Rig veda hymn



Rg.V. I 130.8 - on how the “black skin” Dravidians were conquered by white skinned Aryans

And who exactly has stated that Dasyus refers explicitly to Dark-skinned Dravidians? Where is the hymn that describes the features and characteristics of Dasyus?
 
.
ofcourse why would anyone want to learn hindi...

Yes because u were telling my ego is stopping tamils from learning hindi and preventing them from becoming great construction site workers and that im forcing english on them to become just white collar workers

what if someone wants to?

if a referendum says tamils do want to learn hindi,what would you say?

yes your ego is doing that,you assume 100 things and you dont accept them when they are wrong,so we are forced to make you understand.
 
.
what if someone wants to?

if a referendum says tamils do want to learn hindi,what would you say?

yes your ego is doing that,you assume 100 things and you dont accept them when they are wrong,so we are forced to make you understand.

Are u mad, tamils are free to learn hindi outside school,
 
.
.
The one who need hindi and are not the ones who study in private schools or afford tutions.

This is about government schools,not private schools.
 
.
.
The Dasyu name sounds indentical the Iranian tribe of Dahae but do you have any proof that black Skin referred to Dravidians, the same people they intermarried with. :lol::lol::lol:
Proof? Yeah...Kancha Ilaiah told him in person. :whistle:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom