What are you talking about??? There are scores of Internationally banned terrorist groups which are based in Pakistan.Many of these groups are directly linked to cross border terrorism in Kashmir.These groups themselves claim responsibility after the attacks.
And the state is cracking down upon them thus any allegations through circumstantial evidence goes into the dust.
The former Pakistani dictator Musharraf himself has admitted to using the state machinery in what is widely known as State sponsored terrorism.
I don't remember him saying that and if he did was talking about the 80s and maybe the 90s. I am talking about the current day and age. He also said in Delhi that RAW is supporting terrorists btw.
There are just overwhelming reports about the involvement of ISI as well as the Pakistani terror groups in terrorist activities.Pakistani terrorists were involved in the attack on Indian Parliament,Pakistanis terrorists were involved in Mumbai train bombings and the most recent Mumbai attacks.
Actually the reports against ISI are allegations. There's absolutely no proof that ISI was involved. We discussed this in the thread regarding allegations from LSE.
Pakistan is considered to be the epicenter of terrorism by many countries.If you still want to be in the state of denial,then you can very well be,but let me remind you that,it is this very state of denial of the people of Pakistan that has landed them in trouble.
Actually it's only Indians who consider Pakistan to epicenter of terrorism. Foreigners don't single out Pakistan as you try to. If anyone is in denial, it's you.
You people just don't want to accept that the state was involved in this mess through out the time.
That's your argument? We're suppose to accept something without proof? So why don't you accept Indian support for terrorists as well.
Let me tell you that presence of so many terrorist cells with such a strong base,camps,ideological support,money,arms,is just not possible without the involvement of the state.
So where are the base camps, ideological support, money, arms being provided by the Pakistani state? See what I mean by the denial?
And nevertheless, the state is cracking down on them, so yet again out goes your argument into the dump.
You do not want to accept the thousands of overwhelming reports suggesting Pakistani involvement in terrorism,but let me tell you,without fire there can't be any smoke,and coming to think of it,this not just a fire,this is outright wildfire.
I have to repeat this yet again and I will do it slightly loudly as you still haven't grasped it.
Those reports are only allegations - no proof.
Its funny to note that international reports(not just Indian media) come up with news linking Pakistan and terrorism every other day,
1. A run of the mill simplistic argument. International players have similar interests to India hence they will obviously say similar to what India says.
2. Their reports are only allegations.
3. Their states have denied Pakistan involvement.
but when it comes to the involvement of India,it becomes a closely guarded secret?? Whom are you trying to deceive actually.It looks like the only person you are trying to convince is yourself.
Indians make similar kinds of theories - that NATO is not publicly accusing Pakistan and does not publicly present evidence against Pakistan so as to not make Pakistan unhappy.
And remember what I said. I said the Pakistani state is keeping quite
due to US pressure.
Internet warriors like you like in your fantasy land should not try to argue things that you have not even a single iota of an idea about. These things are not so simple that armchair experts such as yourself can grasp. The arguments above prove how simplistic and naive your thinking is. Your thinking is completely useless when it comes to the matters that I am discussing.
I don't even know why I discuss with people who use utterly simplistic and naive arguments which will only work in Disney land.
You keep saying that nothing is wrong in the Pakistani side just because you don't want to face the truth.
"The truth"? "
THE truth"? How many times have I heard this from an Indian before? What you're talking about is your version of the truth, not
the truth.
By the way,if Indian involvement in terrorism is a secret,then how come you know about it,or talking about it in a public forum???Care to tell us all what are these secrets???
And yet again run of the mill simplistic arguments. I never said it's a secret. I said it's not done publicly. There's tons of army/ISI insiders who have confirmed that India is deeply involved in supporting TTP.
