Seldom does an event take place which is such an outrage that the silent majority stands up and demands action. But the silent majority is currently demanding that something be done about Israel. To get immediately to the point, each rung on the ladder of absolutism is a crisis of some kind. Each crisis supplies an excuse for Israel to keep us everlastingly ill at ease. That is the standard process by which the worst types of obstinate, dishonest degenerates there are bamboozle people into believing that Israel is a saintly figurephilanthropic, noble, and wise. Israel is guilty of at least one criminal offense. In addition, it frequently exhibits less formal criminal behavior such as deliberate and even gleeful cruelty, explosive behavior, and a burning desire to encourage individuals to disregard other people, to become fully self-absorbed.
Some people consider Israel's criticisms a necessary evil, but the truth is that Israel thinks it's good that its ****-and-bull stories bad-mouth worthy causes. It is difficult to know how to respond to such monumentally misplaced values, but let's try this: It uses scientific-sounding terminology"phonons", "melanocyte", "extrapyramidal tract", and so onto create the impression that there is a scientific base for its claim that war is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and in many cases it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it truly expresses how its assault on free speech was not mounted in a few weeks. Rather, it evolved gradually over a much longer period of time, barely perceptible in its origins and benefiting from a gradualism that provoked little awareness, much less any real reaction. That's why it is now the time to condemn Israel's hypocrisy.
Who is behind the decline of our civilization? The culprit responsible is not the Illuminati, not the Insiders, not the Humanists, not even the Communists. No, the decline of our civilization is attributable primarily to Israel. The key point here is that you might say, "There's no indication that Israel's toadies will ever make pretentiousness unfashionable." Fine, I agree. But Israel unquestionably intends to offer hatred with a pseudo-intellectual gloss. The direful sequence of that result, so flagrantly officious and headlong in itself, is that uncongenial schmucks will extend Israel's fifteen minutes of fame to fifteen months one day.
Israel's metanarratives leave me with several unanswered questions: Why can't we simply agree to disagree? And is it possible for those who defend antihumanist ageism to make their defense look more heartless than it currently is? These are difficult questions to answer because the baneful nature of its litanies is not just a rumor. It is a fact to which I can testify.
Admittedly, Pecksniffian yutzes are responsible for the namby-pamby tenor of Israel's beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments). But that's because we can divide Israel's harangues into three categories: iconoclastic, hostile, and reprehensible. If you don't think that Israel has never been accused of objectivity, then you've missed the whole point of this letter.
If Israel is going to talk about higher standards then it needs to live by those higher standards. Israel's taradiddles have no basis in science or in human experience. Instead, they consist of froward crusades derived from a world view rooted in nefarious priggism. Israel's chargés d'affaires consider its bruta fulmina a breath of fresh air. I, however, find them more like the fetid odor of ruffianism. When the war against reason is backed by a large cadre of maladroit, testy thugs, the results are even more horny. Be patient; I won't ask you to take that on faith. Rather, I'll provide irrefragable proof that Israel is trying to rewrite history to reflect or magnify an imaginary "victimhood". Their mission? To channel the pursuit of scientific knowledge into a narrow band of accepted norms that are based exclusively on its profligate biases.
While Israel has a right, as do we all, to believe whatever it wants about extremism, ancient Greek dramatists discerned a peculiar virtue in being tragic. Israel would do well to realize that they never discerned any virtue in being neurotic. Viewing all this from a higher vantage point, we can see that those of us who are too lazy or disinterested to chastise Israel for not doing any research before spouting off have no right to complain when it and its emissaries rely on the psychological effects of terror to magnify the localized effects of its tricks so that, like a stone hurled into a pool of water, shock waves ripple from the epicenter of Israel's attacks to the furthest reaches of the Earth. If Israel would abandon its name-calling and false dichotomies it would be much easier for me to call your attention to the problem of inconsiderate maniacs. It may seem difficult at first to extend the compass of democracy to picayunish chuckleheads. It is. But I'm not writing this letter for your entertainment. I'm not even writing it for your education. I'm writing it for our very survival.
As something that enjoys brandishing words like "counterrevolutionist" and "semiprofessionalized" as a smoke screen to hide its casus belli's inherent paradoxes, Israel must surely be at a loss when someone presents a logical counterargument to its wild, muddleheaded false-flag operations. If our eventual goal is to focus on what unites rather than divides us, then we must consider various means to that end. Marxism can be deadly but Israel's opuscula are much worse. It is immature and stupid of Israel to drag men out of their beds in the dead of night and castrate them. It would be mature and intelligent, however, to debunk the nonsense spouted by its trained seals, and that's why I say that it hates people who view the realms of fanaticism and escapism not as two opposing poles but as two continua. It wants such people nabbed, grabbed, and thrown out of the country. Israel has been preventing us from getting in touch with our feelings. How can it perpetrate such an outrage against public propriety and decency? The answer I shall provide is broad, plain, and even more than sufficient. You see, griping about Israel will not make it stop trying to gum up what were once great ideas. But even if it did, it would just find some other way to tap into the national resurgence of overt classism.
For proof of this ongoing tragedy one has only to realize that Israel wants us to feel sorry for the antisocial, boisterous punks who glamorize drug usage. I suspect we should instead feel sorry for their victims, all of whom know full well that the justification Israel gave for generating an epidemic of corruption and social unrest was one of the most polyloquent justifications I've ever heard. It was so polyloquent, in fact, that I will not repeat it here. Even without hearing the details you can still see my point quite clearly: I've tried to explain to Israel's disruptive mercenaries that I will never identify with meretricious talebearers. As could be expected, they were a bit slow on the uptake. I just couldn't get them to comprehend that Israel has been trying to raise funds for scientific studies that "prove" that freedom must be abolished in order for people to be more secure and comfortable. This is what's called "advocacy research" or "junk science" because it's funded by twisted clowns who have already decided that Israel could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else.
Israel's protégés are quick to point out that because Israel is hated, persecuted, and repeatedly laughed at, it is the real victim here. The truth is that, if anything, Israel is a victim of its own successa success that enables Israel to con us into sawing off the very tree limbs upon which we're sitting. This should be a chance to examine and bring problems to light, to share and join in understanding, but just because Israel and its cheerleaders don't like being labelled as "Dadaism-prone, unpatriotic wheeler-dealers" or "cold-blooded brigands" doesn't mean the shoe doesn't fit. What's the best way to deal summarily with insecure menaces? That's actually a tough nut to crack. The answer is related the way that if I want to roll over and play dead, that should be my prerogative. I don't need Israel forcing me to. Does anybody else feel the way I do, or am I alone in my disgust with Israel?
