What's new

What does Pakistan school books teach about Hindus?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why not another beautiful partition, India is already divided ideologically between Hindus and Muslims.

Only a physical division is required now, much easier task now.
Isi sapne mai aapke do tukde ho gaye, rehne dijiye.
 
1400 years ago and still now expecting all men to voluntarily give up the male chauvinsim coz Allah swt expects so would be childish at best . There was a reason to direct a lady to the judge so that she could actually get her rights enforced by the state

Who do you think she must approach if she's not feeling sexually satisfied apart from other issues? It's not like after approaching the qaazi she could be coerced to live in a relationship without her consent .the qaazi/judge has to cave in to her legit demands in any case and that includes divorce
I think you are confused by what I am saying. Let me clarify. I am not against the right to Muslim women to appraoch qaazi for seeking divorce.
I am just calling out the injustice to the wife that the husband has the right to give 'talak' to wife by just uttering some words. You have correctly called out that we cannot expect men to voluntarily give up the male chauvinism.
 
If this is so fine a system, then why not give the same right to wife too.


Both husband and wife have rights to divorce, why make divorce complicated?

Why drag out divorce proceedings, if the marriage has failed, get it over quickly with and get on with your life
Isi sapne mai aapke do tukde ho gaye, rehne dijiye.

It's already happening in India,India is a divided hatefilled poisonous hindutva extremist communal shithole

Indian Muslims will increasingly gather in vast majority Muslim areas that will form the basis of future muslim countries
 
Isi sapne mai aapke do tukde ho gaye, rehne dijiye.
BD was a separate country even then just as now... The idea was about separate areas where Muslims are in majority to be given to them to be independent, call it BD or east Bengal, still not integrated into India.
 
This is very sad.
But our hindus are much better looking than Indians ones
Beauty is the eyes of the beholder :D
Anyways, discussion on looks is off-topic
India also have a book called the constitution of India, which have clauses about India being a secular country and state has no business with the religion and all are equal.

Does the current India follows that constitution, with prejudiced CAA enacted, constitution breached in India held Kashmir.

And it is his story, of Modi's has taken precedence over history, the reason for the rise of Hindutva...

So it's history versus his(story).
I agree that CAA is in a constitutional grey area. I personally dont like how CAA is worded today. Instead of saying 'non-muslim', it should be changed to 'prosecuted minorities'.

Please explain what constitution was breached in Kashmir.
 
Last edited:
Sure. I am ready to explain.
They wrote extensively about Indian land but not a single line about their so called former home. Do you think this is 'normal'. If you migrate from Pakistan to US and prolifically write about your life in US, would you not mention anything about your upbringing in Pak?

Apart from this, there is no positive evidence to support Aryan migration theory. It is only a theory which came about in British time. This was another one of their tools used for divide and rule.
If I'm trying to wow my slave subjects into becoming obedient, I will tell them what they want to hear. It's simple marketing really.

If I'm selling phones in India, I'm going to tell you how well they work in India.
 
If I'm trying to wow my slave subjects into becoming obedient, I will tell them what they want to hear. It's simple marketing really.

If I'm selling phones in India, I'm going to tell you how well they work in India.
Britishers were very few in number. The only way they could continue ruling vast majority of Indians were to make them fight against each other. This is how they gained power. They would promise protection to one raja against the other and take money from him for British troops posted there. They would promise the same to the other raja and take money from him too.
I am sure you know how they defeated Mughals to capture Bengal.
 
Apart from this, there is no positive evidence to support Aryan migration theory
As for "positive evidence"...khuda kei bande...people are tired of my explanations. Here we go again...

Rakhigiri. Your own archaeological site. A body was studied. She had IVC heritage from Pakistani lands. However the authors made clear that in northern and western parts of modern India, the ANI genetic signature (I.e. the erstwhile Aryans) is presently UBIQUITOUS.
The rakhigiri body had no Aryan heritage but modern Indians in the north and west do, ubiquitously.

Now don't derail this otherwise useful thread. This is why you have a reputation as a troll.

Kindly reflect on this.
 
The hindus of IV came here thousands of years ago...they have assimilated with the local culture of negroids or austroids who were living there before them..the hinduism is a blend of cultures , faiths and beliefs of different aborigines of india( whoever came here thousands of years ago and called it their land , have a right over this land unlike people who claim arab or iran ancestry)

If you love aborigines so much why do people with slightly higher than average aboriginal ancestry, the Dalits and untouchables, have subhuman status? The Brahmins even created books on how to treat lower castes - Manusmriti - despite themselves having substantial aboriginal black ancestry.

"Blend of cultures" yeah? It's a sickening ancient cult.
 
What was the dress of Hindus before Muslims arrived?
Cultural dressing for men and women has remained the same in the last 2000 years

Cultural dressing for Indian men traces back to 1 AD .
1618509549649.png

Angarkha

Cultural dressing for women
Choli Aka blouse tracing back to 320 AD during Gupta dynasty
1618509792359.png

Choli

And Saree, which has its origins in Indus valley
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sari#Origins_and_history

What do you define as 'proper dress'?
To figure out answer, one must understand the mindset behind it

Some Pakistanis have a low sense of self value owing to 2400 years of subjugation. right from Achaemenids in 518BC to all the way British in 1947
Achaemenid conquest of the Indus Valley

This poor response to invaders has led to self-hate and coping mechanism for some with delusions of Arabs(One of their subjugators) bringing civilization to humanity and India being a part of it

I have across creatures here even claiming Islam taught Indians to count and zero was an Arab invention
 
As for "positive evidence"...khuda kei bande...people are tired of my explanations. Here we go again...

Rakhigiri. Your own archaeological site. A body was studied. She had IVC heritage from Pakistani lands. However the authors made clear that in northern and western parts of modern India, the ANI genetic signature (I.e. the erstwhile Aryans) is presently UBIQUITOUS.
The rakhigiri body had no Aryan heritage but modern Indians in the north and west do, ubiquitously.

Now don't derail this otherwise useful thread. This is why you have a reputation as a troll.

Kindly reflect on this.
If I am merely replying to you on your point, how am I a troll. You are welcome to open a separate thread and invite me there if you worry about me answering you here.

Care to give me the link for details on archaeological finding which you are talking about which proves Aryan migration theory. I would read it before commenting on it. (and after you open a dedicated thread for it).
 
Hindus are known to burn their own homes to show that other religious groups have done it. Happened in pakistan pre partition, happens in bangladesh today, even very common in India.
 
Hindus are known to burn their own homes to show that other religious groups have done it. Happened in pakistan pre partition, happens in bangladesh today, even very common in India.
Proof?
 
Give me a single Quran stanza which encourages eating beef.




Quran (36:71) Do they not see Our handiwork:60 We created for them cattle which they own? (36:72) We have subjected the cattle to them so that some of them they ride and eat the flesh of others. (36:73) They derive a variety of benefits and drinks from them. Will they, then, not give thanks?61
 
Quran (36:71) Do they not see Our handiwork:60 We created for them cattle which they own? (36:72) We have subjected the cattle to them so that some of them they ride and eat the flesh of others. (36:73) They derive a variety of benefits and drinks from them. Will they, then, not give thanks?61
The above post only says that you are permitted to eat the flesh of cattle. Where does it say you 'should' eat their flesh?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom