Proudpakistaniguy
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2013
- Messages
- 4,890
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
You dont need to work in this field. Life must have been started at some point in the past and obviously population was not as huge as it is today and they have no options but to marry among each others within their community which gave existence to the next generation lolNo, I dont have my own theory, I dont work in that field, nor do I have army of people to gather evidence over years to make right conclusion.... plus am nowhere near as smart to do relevant research..
so I will yield to whatever knowledge they share with us...and 'one man.. one woman.. theory.. ' as you put it, is certainly not the theory that is subscribed to.
the link you gave about aussie scientists claiming first causin marriage have same risk as having kids over 40... which is to say there IS risk but not enough to be alarmed .. or ban it... (thats their point)..
am not saying to ban it either... just think of higher risk after each generation... (not one)...
If you read my first post then I said same that its very slight risk only in those couples who are carrying some sort of genetic disorder but its often exaggerated and there are many others factors which contribute toward poor mental or physical health of a child