What's new

What do you know about the Last Caliph?

Amalek

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Messages
238
Reaction score
0
Hi friends,

I want to find information about the Last Caliph of Islam, who was dethroned by a fool names Gemal Ataturk.

I could not find any information, other than info that he was exiled, and he went to Switzerland with his family. He was broke at that time.

Anyone can confirm it?

Does anyone know where the family of our Last Caliph is?
 
Attaturk and a fool?

Anyway interesting topic, I'm pretty sure there wasn't one Ameer-ul-momineen by 1924. Attaturk only ended the Caliphate system.
 
Ottoman Caliphate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Insignia

Ottoman Religious Flag, or the flag of the caliphate 1517-1844A chief symbol of the Ottoman Caliphate was the "Great Banner of the Caliphs", a huge green banner embroidered with texts from the Qur'an and with the name of Allah emblazened upon it 28,000 times in golden letters. It was passed down in the Ottoman dynasty from father to son and only carried into battle if the Sultan himself or his specifically designated representative was there in person.


History
1517-1875
For the last 400 years of its existence, the Caliphate was claimed by the Turkish Sultans of the Ottoman Empire. Though the Ottomans actively used the title only sporadically, from 1517 onwards the Ottoman Sultan came to be viewed as the de facto leader and representative of the Islamic world. From Constantinople (now Istanbul), the Ottomans ruled over an empire that, at its peak, covered Anatolia, most of the Middle East, North Africa, the Caucasus, and extended deep into Eastern Europe.

Strengthened by the Peace of Westphalia, the Reformation, and the Industrial Revolution, European powers regrouped and challenged Ottoman dominance. Owing largely to poor leadership, archaic political norms, and an inability to keep pace with technological progress in Europe, the Ottoman Empire could not respond effectively to Europe’s resurgence and gradually lost its position as a pre-eminent superpower.

By the late nineteenth century, the Ottoman Empire’s problems had evolved into crises. Territorial losses in conflicts such as the Russo-Turkish Wars substantially reduced Ottoman strength and influence, and years of financial mismanagement came to a head when the Empire defaulted on its loans in 1875. No other state in the Islamic world arose to challenge the Ottomans’ faltering leadership and revitalize Muslim power, and the balance shifted decisively in Europe’s favor.


[edit] Abdul-Hamid II, 1876-1909
See also: Decline of the Ottoman Empire
Sultan Abdul-Hamid II, who ruled 1876-1909, felt that the Empire’s desperate situation could only be remedied through strong and determined leadership. He distrusted his ministers and other officials that had served his predecessors and gradually reduced their role in his regime, concentrating absolute power over the Empire’s governance in his own hands. Taking a hard-line against Western involvement in Ottoman affairs, he emphasized the Empire’s "Islamic" character, reasserted his status as the Caliph, and called for Muslim unity behind the Caliphate.

Abdul-Hamid strengthened the Empire’s position somewhat and succeeded briefly in reasserting Islamic power, by building numerous schools, reducing the national debt, and embarking on projects aimed at revitalizing the Empire’s decaying infrastructure. His autocratic style of governance created a backlash that led to the end of his reign,

Western-inclined Turkish military officers opposed to Hamid’s rule had steadily organized in the form of secret societies within and outside Turkey. By 1906, the movement enjoyed the support of a significant portion of the army, and its leaders formed the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP), informally known as the Young Turk Party. The Young Turks sought to remodel administration of the Empire along Western lines. Their ideology was nationalist in character, and was a precursor of the movement that would seize control of Turkey following World War I. Though privately disdainful of Islam and the religious establishment, CUP leaders presented their ideas to the public as a revival of true Islamic principles. Under the leadership of Enver Pasha, a Turkish military officer, the CUP launched a military coup against the Sultan in 1908, proclaiming a new regime on July 6. Though they left Abdul-Hamid on his throne, the Young Turks compelled him to restore the parliament and constitution he had suspended thirty years earlier, thereby creating a constitutional monarchy and stripping the Caliphate of its authority.


[edit] Countercoup and 31 March Incident
Main articles: Countercoup (1909) and 31 March Incident
A counter-coup launched by soldiers loyal to the Sultan threatened the new government but ultimately failed. After nine months into the new parliamentary term, discontent and reaction found expression in a fundamentalist movement, the counter-revolutionary 31 March Incident, which actually occurred on 13 April 1909. Many aspects of this revolt, which started within certain sections of the mutinying army in Istanbul, are still yet to be analyzed. Its generally admitted perception of a ‘reactionary’ movement has sometimes been challenged, given the results and effects on the young political system.

Abdul-Hamid was deposed on April 13, 1909. He was replaced by his brother Rashid Effendi, who was proclaimed Sultan Mehmed V on April 27.


[edit] Mehmed V, 1909 - 1922

[edit] With Libya
In 1911 Italy warred with the Ottomans over Libya, and Turkey’s failure to defend these regions demonstrated the weakness of the Ottoman military. In 1912 Bulgaria, Serbia, Montenegro, and Greece formed the Balkan League, an anti-Turkish alliance that subsequently launched a joint attack on the Ottoman Empire. The ensuing Balkan Wars eliminated what little presence the Ottomans had left in Europe, and only infighting between the Balkan League allies prevented them from advancing into Anatolia.

Internally, the Ottomans continued to be troubled by political instability. Nationalist uprisings that had plagued the Empire sporadically for the past fifty years intensified. The masses were growing frustrated with chronic misgovernance and Turkey’s poor showing in military conflicts. In response, the CUP led a second coup d’etat in 1913 and seized absolute control of the government. For the next five years, the Empire was a one-party state ruled by the CUP under the leadership of Enver Pasha (who returned to Istanbul after having served Turkey abroad in various military and diplomatic capacities since the initial coup), Minister of the Interior Talat Pasha, and Minister of the Navy Cemal Pasha. Though the Sultan was retained, he made no effort to exercise power independent of the Young Turks and was effectively their puppet. The Caliphate was thus held nominally by Mehmed V, but the authority attached to the office rested with the Young Turks.


[edit] World War I
See also: Middle Eastern theater of World War I
As World War I broke out in Europe, the Young Turks struck an alliance with Germany, a move that would have disastrous consequences. The Empire entered the war on the side of the Central Powers in November 1914, and Britain, France, and Russia immediately declared war on Turkey. As the development of the war, the empire’s position continued to deteriorate, and even in the Middle East—the very heartland of the Islamic world—would soon be lost.


[edit] Call for Jihad
Though the Young Turks had compelled the Sultan in his capacity as the Caliph to declare a global jihad urging all Muslims to resist Allied encroachment on their lands, the effort was largely unsuccessful. The Young Turk government resigned en masse and Enver, Talat, and Cemal fled Turkey aboard a German warship. Sultan Mehmed VI, who was proclaimed Sultan after his brother Mehmed V died of a heart attack in July, agreed to an armistice. The Armistice of Mudros formalizing Ottoman surrender was signed aboard a British warship on October 30, 1918. Allied troops arrived in Istanbul and occupied the Sultan’s palace shortly thereafter. see:Proclamation of the Sherif of Mecca


[edit] Partitioning of the Ottoman Empire
Main articles: Partitioning of the Ottoman Empire, Occupation of Istanbul, Khilafat Movement, and Treaty of Sèvres
By the end of the war, the Ottomans had lost virtually their entire Empire. Hoping to keep his throne and preserve the Ottoman dynasty in some form or another, the Sultan agreed to cooperate with the Allies, see Occupation of Istanbul. He dissolved parliament and allowed an Allied military administration to replace the government vacated by the Young Turks.


[edit] Khilafat Movement
See also: Khilafat Movement
The Khilafat movement (1919-1924) was a political campaign launched mainly by Muslims in India to influence the British government and to protect the caliphate (Ottoman Caliphate) during the aftermath of World War I. The position of Caliph after the Armistice of Mudros (October, 1918) with the military occupation of Istanbul, and Treaty of Versailles (1919) fall into a disambiguation along with the Ottoman Empire's existence. The movement gained force after the Treaty of Sèvres (August 1920) which solidified the partitioning of the Ottoman Empire[1]. In some regions, Khilafat cause was perceived as Islamic fundamentalism based on a pan-Islamic agenda.


[edit] Abolition
Main articles: Atatürk's Reforms and Turkish National Movement
The Turkish national movement, as the details explained in Turkish War of Independence forms a Turkish Grand National Assembly, secured formal recognition of the nation’s independence and new borders on July 23, 1923 through the Treaty of Lausanne. The National Assembly declared Turkey a republic on October 29 and proclaimed Ankara its new capital. After nearly 700 years, the Ottoman Empire had officially ceased to exist. However, under Allied direction, the Sultan pledged to suppress such movements and secured an official fatwa from the Sheikh ul-Islam declaring them to be un-Islamic. But the nationalists steadily gained momentum and began to enjoy widespread support. Many sensed that the nation was ripe for revolution. In an effort to neutralize this threat, the Sultan agreed to hold elections, with the hope of placating and co-opting the nationalists. To his dismay, nationalist groups swept the polls, prompting him to again dissolve parliament in April 1920.

Initially, the National Assembly seemed willing to allow a place for the Caliphate in the new regime, agreeing to the appointment of Mehmed’s cousin Abdul Mejid II as Caliph upon Mehmed’s departure. But the position had been stripped of any authority, and Abdul Mejid’s purely ceremonial reign would be short lived. Mustafa Kemal had been a vocal critic of the Ottoman House and its Islamic orientation. Now that he controlled Turkey and had the people’s overwhelming support, he could run the nation as he pleased. When Abdul Mejid was declared Caliph, Kemal refused to allow the traditional Ottoman ceremony to take place, bluntly declaring,

The Khalifa has no power or position except as a nominal figurehead.

In response to Abdul Mejid's petition for an increase in his allowance, Kemal wrote,

Your office, the Khalifate, is no more than an historic relic. It has no justification for existence. It is a piece of impertinence that you should dare write to any of my secretaries!


Abdelmajid IIStill, for all the power he had already wielded in Turkey, Kemal did not dare to abolish the Caliphate outright, as it still commanded a considerable degree of support from the common people.

Then an event happened which was to deal a fatal blow to the Caliphate. Two Indian brothers, Maulana Muhammad Ali and Shawkat, leaders of the Indian-based Khilafat Movement, distributed pamphlets calling upon the Turkish people to preserve the Ottoman Caliphate for the sake of Islam. Under Turkey's new nationalist government, however, this was construed as foreign intervention, and any form of foreign intervention was labeled an insult to Turkish sovereignty, and worse, a threat to State security. Kemal promptly seized his chance. On his initiative, the National Assembly abolished the Caliphate on March 3, 1924. Abdul Mejid was sent into exile along with the remaining members of the Ottoman House, marking the official end of the "Ottoman Caliphate".
 
Hi friends,

I want to find information about the Last Caliph of Islam, who was dethroned by a fool names Gemal Ataturk.

I could not find any information, other than info that he was exiled, and he went to Switzerland with his family. He was broke at that time.

Anyone can confirm it?

Does anyone know where the family of our Last Caliph is?

last caliph of islam was hazrat ali (RA),ummaied, abbasi and ottmon were muslim empires,and they had kings not caliphs
 
Formally, the last caliph was Abdulaziz who became the caliph after Vahdettin. When Turkish National Army gained absolute victory against to British-French-Italian-Greek armies, Sultan Vahdettin -who opposed to Turkish National Army- had to leave Turkiye and then he left the title of caliphate. After that, Turkish Grand National Assembly abolished the title of "sultanate" on 1st of November 1922 and the TGNA elected Abdulaziz as the caliph. Abdulaziz who is from Ottoman Dynasty and who were much more British servant, opposite to fighting colonialist states, were not one of the honored victor Turk.
But Abdulaziz behaved like a sultan and he served as a British servant in Turkiye. The young Turkish State was a result of a honorable, hard and absolute independence aimed fight against to the most powerful empires of the world. And noone could accept a monarch to be sovereign in Turkiye. Then the Turkish Grand National Assemly abolished the caliphate on 3rd of March 1924.

Also I accept the idea of Alamgir, real caliphate ended with Caliph Hz. Ali. After him, all they served to their own part of Muslim world.
 
It is a travesty of the Caliphate to think Ottomon Sultans were Caliphs. These rulers were Sultans/ Padshahs but not the Khalifas in any sense of the word. As long as there were capable and worthy rulers; Ottomons were unbeatable, however there is a natural tendency in any empire to become degenerate. The fact that Ottomons lasted 500 years !!.is a remarkable achievement.

When seen as Khalifa (Allah's viceroy on earth) hardly any of these sultans were worthy. However, as temporal emperors, many of the Ottomons were such as Sulaiman Qanooni, Salim, Mehmat the Conquerer etc;the Ottomon Sultans were peerless.

Ata Turk was no fool. He realised that evey empire must change with the times or completely disappear (as Roman empire did). Today's Turkiya, even though not even a facsmilie of the empire of the time of Sulaiman Qanooni, is still preferable to being a British colony; which she would have been had there been no Ata Turk. Mustafa Kamal pasha, I salute you.
 
Ferrari,

Could you amplify as to why Ataturk is a fool?

It is an interesting observation, considering that he is credited to be the Father of Modern Turkey and more interestingly, Turkey is one of the most advanced country amongst the Islamic countries!

So, how come?
 
last caliph of islam was hazrat ali (RA),ummaied, abbasi and ottmon were muslim empires,and they had kings not caliphs

I am completly agree with you Alamgir we have Four Chalipahs and after them Kings as you say .. :agree:
 
Ferrari,

Could you amplify as to why Ataturk is a fool?

It is an interesting observation, considering that he is credited to be the Father of Modern Turkey and more interestingly, Turkey is one of the most advanced country amongst the Islamic countries!

So, how come?

I was a little pissed-off after reading that Attaturk has demolished Islamic Traditions and values in Turkey, and practicing Muslims are being persecuted, women being denied education and even put in jail for wearing a veil or covering their heads.

I believe in personal freedom and liberty of individual, but a state has no right to dictate to its population the whims and fancies of its rulers. And Attaurk was one such ruler.

I appreciate that the Turkish National Army defeated the imperial British and Greek armies in 1922, what did he have a right to destroy Islam in a society which was the head of Islamic Empire for more than 500 years.

Also, there are many sources which link Attaturk and his cronies to the Armenian Genocide. Listen to the tape MP3 http://music.informationpile.com/armeniangenocide.mp3

I only want people to be free, free from fear that the military may impose purported "Secular" values. People should be free to choose. There is little freedom in Turkey today.
 
astaghfirullah! what is this? we have people here glorifying Mustapha Kamal and criticizing the khilafat?

it doesn't matter whether the righteous khilafat ended after Hadhrat Ali, the khilafat is still an integral part of islam. whether he may be a king, drunkard, or doesn't even pray, we must follow him. as long as this ummah has a leader to unite everyone, that's all that matters.

there have been righteous khulafah as well in our history besides the first four. it is our duty to do what best serves islam, not criticize the islamic system. the muslim does not do that, it will do everyone well to remember that.

Look at what happened after Ataturk took over. Kamalism replaced shari'a law with european legal codes, islamic calendar with the gregorian calendar, replaced the arabic alphabets with latin, mosques preaced Kamalism.

Ataturk outlawed Sufi practices, forbade the traditional clothing, ordered muslims to use the turkish word "tanri" instead of Allah, he crushed all rebellions by sunni, shi'a, and sufis.

alhamdulillah, islam is starting to return to Turkey and these Kamalists are starting to wet their pants. they can't control the people anymore with their extremist ideology.
 
the entire muslim world fell into ruin when the khilafat ended. we've been in a deep hole ever since for many decades now. muslims, now numbering more than 1.3 billion, have no power or say in the world. we're just a bunch of pathetic heaps who whine and complain about our condition.

what we need is action on the people's part. we need to stress the need for unity, otherwise we will loose out even more. if we work towards the future, like jews did for israel, we will be able to reach it. we will not get anywhere if we criticize the generations before us for our problems.

i pray that i live to see the day when the khilafat returns. muslims have ruled this world many times, we can do it again. the hidden beast that is the ummah will shake the world.
 
this is a nice book from http://www.thefutureisforislam.com/ . It mentions the army that will come from khurasaan, which can very easily include parts of pakistan.

as some people may know that pakistan shares only punjab with india. the other parts of pakistan including NWFP, FATA, and Balochistan were apart of the afghan kingdoms, which in turn were apart of khurasaan.

there is also mention of an army that will conquer hind, or modern day india near the end times. if some of you may have noticed, pakistan is conveniently located between khurasaan and hind. we are the only muslim nuclear power and not to mention defense producer.
____________________________________________
“The army from Khurasan” that will come to help the Mahdi has developed
a legendary status in Islamic prophecy circles. Khurasan is most
likely to be Iran, but can also be Afghanistan or, as an outside chance,
even Pakistan, as ancient Khurasan may have included parts of northwestern
Pakistan. When the black banners — the army — from
Khurasan are referred to, it does not necessarily mean that they will
constitute the whole fighting force of the Mahdi, but that they will be
among its constituents. Their coming to support the Mahdi will be one
of the signs that the Mahdi is here.

The historical region of Khurasan extended along the north from
the Amu Darya (Oxus River) westward to the Caspian Sea and, along
the south, from the fringes of the central Iranian deserts eastward to
central Afghanistan. Arab geographers even spoke of its extending to
the boundaries of India.

The people from Khurasan could be Iranians, Afghans, or even
Arabs, as a large number of Arabs went to Afghanistan to fight the
Soviet invasion, and they are known as the “Afghans.” In addition,
almost half a million Pakistanis fought in the Afghanistan war at various
times and would support the Mahdi. In short, there will be far
more people rushing to support the Mahdi than he would be in need of.

86. Abdullah, son of al-Harith, son of Juz’ al-Zubaydi, said: The Prophet
said: “A people will come out of the East who will pave the way
for the Mahdi.
”86

87. “Pity poor Taliqan (a region in Afghanistan) that at that place are
treasures of Allah, but these are not of gold and silver. There are
people who have recognized Allah, as they should have. They are
the supporters of the Mahdi in the End Times.
”87
-----------------------------------------------
86 Ibn Majah
87 Al-Muttaqi al-Hindi, Al-Burhan fi Alamat al-Mahdi Akhir al-zaman, p. 59
 
(here's for hind)

121. Thawban narrated that the Messenger of Allah said: “Two groups
of my Ummah (community) Allah has protected from the hellfire
— a group that will conquer India and a group that will be
with Jesus, son of Mary.
”121

122. Na’im, son of Hammad in al-Fitan, reports that Abu Huraira said
that the Messenger of Allah mentioned India and said: “A group
of you will conquer India. Allah will open (India) for them until
they come with its kings chained — Allah having forgiven their
sins — when they return (from India), they will find the son of
Mary in Syria.
”122

123. While Abu Huraira said: “The Messenger of Allah promised us
the conquest of India. If I was to come across that event I will
spend my soul and wealth. If I am killed, then I am among the best
of martyrs. And if I return, then I am Abu Huraira, the freed.
”123

It may be argued by some that the Muslims already conquered
India over a thousand years ago, so this prophecy has already been
fulfilled, but in these sayings of the Messenger of God, there is a clear
link between the conquest of India and the arrival of Jesus.

Today, the problems between India and Pakistan have not been
resolved, and India continues to occupy Muslim territory in Kashmir,
treats its Muslims citizens unfairly, and is also increasing its relations
with those countries who are extremely hostile to Islam, including Israel.
So, it would not be beyond the realm of possibility that after the Mahdi
appears, India will be part of the coalition lined up against Islam, with
the result that there will be a war between India and Pakistan.
------------------------------------------------------
121 Ahmad, Nisa’i, Kitab ul-jihad; at-Tabarani
122 Kitab Al Fitan
123 Ahmad, an-Nisa’i, and al-Hakim
 
the entire muslim world fell into ruin when the khilafat ended. we've been in a deep hole ever since for many decades now. muslims, now numbering more than 1.3 billion, have no power or say in the world. we're just a bunch of pathetic heaps who whine and complain about our condition.

what we need is action on the people's part. we need to stress the need for unity, otherwise we will loose out even more. if we work towards the future, like jews did for israel, we will be able to reach it. we will not get anywhere if we criticize the generations before us for our problems.

i pray that i live to see the day when the khilafat returns. muslims have ruled this world many times, we can do it again. the hidden beast that is the ummah will shake the world.

In the last 1400 years of Islam's existence, we have been without an empire only in the last 80 years.

I had always been taught to be proud of my Muslim culture, and heard stories of how strong and brave the Sahaabas were, and how Islam spread over middle east, Africa and Europe...

But the more you read history outside these legends and fables, the more you realize that all this is a sham. Islam was never united. It was not united then, it is not united now... :(

Right after the Prophet passed away, brothers started fighting for power. Bibi Ayesha fouight with sahaaba Ali. Yazid murdered Prophet's grandchildren Hassan and Hussain.

History is rotten with such facts that would shame us. All Muslims are brothers of each other... Only on Paper...

I couldn't believe my eyes when i saw Saudi Arabia warning Iran...:rofl:

Sauids don't support Hezbollah??? Oh... The CORRUPT Saudi government does not support Hezbollah. For these people, Power and preserving their personal wealth & kingdom is more important than brotherhood.
 
there's no excuse for not striving towards islam. we don't look at other people who don't pray and do the same. Times will be difficult for muslims and will get MUCH MORE WORSE, this was predicted by Prophet Muhammad (SAWS). If you actually go through the signs of the day of judgement, you will find it shockingly accurate.

For example, in Dhu al Hijja of 1407, or 1987, more than 400 Irani Pilgrims were killed near the Kaba. Security forces clashed with Iranians over an anti-US protest. Bloodshed at the Kaba was predicted long time ago.

“There come the cries of war in Shawwall (tenth Islamic month)
with the outbreak of a war and massacre and carnage in Dhu al-
Hijja (twelfth Islamic month) and again the plundering of pilgrims
in Dhu al-Hijja, and the crossing of streets is not even possible
because of bloodshed, and religious prohibitions are violated. Big
sins are committed near Beyt-ül Muazzam (Ka’ba).
”

Kitab-ül Burhan Fi Alameti-il Mehdiyy-il Ahir Zaman, p. 37

here are some more examples

The Prophet (may God bless him and grant him peace) said: "Fitna will spread after me. Terror and war will rage. Then, there will be greater fitnas. When people will say that the fitna has ended, new rebellions will appear. Until someone from my lineage [the Mahdi] emerges, there will be no home in Arabia into which fitna will not enter and a Muslim to whom fitna will not reach.

(Fera Idu Fevaidi'l Fiqr Fi'l Imam al-Mahdi al-Muntadhar, p. 147)

earthquakes like the frequent ones right now will come to pass

The Hour [Last Day] will not be established until ... earthquakes will be very frequent. (Sahih Bukhari)

hurricanes, cyclones, tornados... whatever you want to call it will come to pass

Doomsday will not happen until 10 portents are seen. The tenth is a tornado that will hurl people into the sea ... (Muhammad ibn `Abd ar-Rasul Barzanji, Al-Isha`ah li Ashrat as-Sa`ah, p. 288)

and of course floods

The Hour will not come until there has been rain which destroy all dwellings. (Ibn Ahmad Hanbal)
 
Back
Top Bottom