What caused overpopulation in Pakistan?

[ThunderCat]

This is not what we or anyone else wants:

 

[Maula Jatt]

This is not what we or anyone else wants:

A shit
Which city is it?

 

[SecularNationalist]

Use of less thing rubber caused this .

 

[ThunderCat]

Use of less thing rubber caused this .

No. Too much fertile land created from our temperate climate caused this.

No species can have such a huge population prior to having a preceding enormous food supply.

Countries such as Nigeria, Egypt, Pakistan, India, China & Bangladesh are examples of this. Although usage of condoms is still helpful in slowing this down.

But ultimately producing too much more food than we actually needed caused this population eruption.

 

[313ghazi]

No. Too much fertile land created from our temperate climate caused this.

No species can have such a huge population prior to having a preceding enormous food supply.

Countries such as Nigeria, Egypt, Pakistan, India, China & Bangladesh are examples of this. Although usage of condoms is still helpful in slowing this down.

But ultimately producing too much more food than we actually needed caused this population eruption.

Tens of millions of kids have stunted growth due to malnutrition. We don't have "too much food", we have too much breeding.

 

[ThunderCat]

Tens of millions of kids have stunted growth due to malnutrition. We don't have "too much food", we have too much breeding.

None of which could have been alive had their parents had nothing to eat.

As pointed out by academicians and intellects, humans are not made from thin air, but from converted plant and animal matter.

What are the main nutrients required for breeding mammals? Humans developed agriculture and so have developed an unnatural growth cycle of more food being grown which is accompanied by more people.

All animal population models use food/carrying capacity to show a grow & decline cycle. But with humans because of agriculture, there is an abnormal pattern of too much food produced followed by an excessive population growth followed by more food and so on and so fourth.

 

[313ghazi]

None of which could have been alive had their parents had nothing to eat.

As pointed out by academicians and intellects, humans are not made from thin air, but from converted plants and animal matter.

What are the main nutrients required for breeding mammals? Humans developed agriculture and so have developed an unnatural growth cycle of more food being grown which is accompanied by more people.

All animal population models use food/carrying capacity to show a grow & decline cycle. But with humans because of agriculture, there is an abnormal pattern of too much food produced followed by an excessive population growth followed by more food and so on and so fourth.

Explain to me this, why has the population of Ethopia continued to grown despite regular famine?

In those conditions they make even more babies in the hope that some of them survive!

Afghanistan is another example. Having famine and war hasn't stopped them more than tripling their population.

 

[SecularNationalist]

No. Too much fertile land created from our temperate climate caused this.

No species can have such a huge population prior to having a preceding enormous food supply.

Countries such as Nigeria, Egypt, Pakistan, India, China & Bangladesh are examples of this. Although usage of condoms is still helpful in slowing this down.

But ultimately producing too much more food than we actually needed caused this population eruption.

That's some 2000 year old theory mate.
These days imports are fast and easy. Doesn't matter how infertile your land is , with imports you get a food on your table. The developed countries like Norway,Finland etc don't have any fertile lands or big in agricultural, but their stomachs are full. And their children are maximum two. It's always about having different priorities with a right education.
Here poor often have far more kids than the rich ones and their logic is "koi nai Allah palle ga". They somehow survive but live a very low standard life.

 

[ThunderCat]

That's some 2000 year old theory mate.
These days imports are fast and easy. Doesn't matter how infertile your land is , with imports you get a food on your table. The developed countries like Norway,Finland etc don't have any fertile lands or big in agricultural, but their stomachs are full. And their children are maximum two. It's always about having different priorities with a right education.
Here poor often have far more kids than the rich ones and their logic is "koi nai Allah palle ga". They somehow survive but live a very low standard life.

No that's a new theory. Developed under a discipline known as ecology, a sub-discipline of biology. It was first developed in the 18th century on marine animals in the medditerenian sea.

The predatory shark population would increase with a large fish population to hunt on. But with their increase, the fish population dwindled; thus eventually dwindling their own population.

Just look up the Lynx-Hare cycle as another example of the very same thing http://www.causalpatterns.org/resources/ecosystems/pdfs/s6_res_lynxhare.pdf

Countries that have their own fertile lands have still outpaced others that import food. That's how human civilizations started out.

They needed temperate land first and foremost. That's how Greeks & Romans got a good head-start. Temperate land for human settlement.

The ancient Egyptians & Mesopotamians had it even earlier due to having a bonus of having fresh water rivers and good farmland, alongside our partial Harrappan ancestors.

The Scandinavian countries you mentioned are the opposite; hence their populations are so tiny compared to ours. Much of their landmasses are inhospitable to human life as it is. The same is with Canada.

All these countries practice seasonal farming. Also note Finnish & Saami peoples were hunters until very recently. Hunting is possible in Scandinavia & Canada all year around.

That's how human beings inhabited these areas long before the industrial revolution. Today they get most of their food from imports and produce homegrown food seasonally. Their climates simply cannot support population growth which is why they want immigration. While immigration might be economically "sustainable" it will not be so ecologically.

 

[ThunderCat]

Explain to me this, why has the population of Ethopia continued to grown despite regular famine?

In those conditions they make even more babies in the hope that some of them survive!

Afghanistan is another example. Having famine and war hasn't stopped them more than tripling their population.

Quite simple. To quote Peter Farb:

"Intensification of food production to feed an increased population leads to a still greater increase in population."

Both Daniel Quinn and Steve Earl Salmony have emphasized this. The Ethiopians had food given to them to deal with their famine. Too much more food than they actually needed to survive which resulted in more hungry Ethiopians.

 

[ThunderCat]

The developed countries like Norway,Finland etc don't have any fertile lands or big in agricultural, but their stomachs are full. And their children are maximum two.

I forgot to add, they have enough to feed themselves but not to grow their population significantly, thanks to their cold climates.

Also as such, their winters I doubt there is much room for spare calories to support their population growth.

 

[ThunderCat]

Over population is a biggest issue of pak which idiot nation who have no brain blindly following him but he has no plan to ever talk on this big issue becoz he cannot face backlash of mullahs

Our leaders are brains down don't want to raise big issues just pulling each other chairs

Idiot nation blindly follow Imran but he has no plan he just keep saying one thing azadi corruption etc and do nothing many slogans he took u turn yet stupid nation follow him he is a disaster

Over population litracy rate are big issues of Pakistan lack of knowledge stand for your rights against mafia in daily life like big brands who take govt taxes from our pockets which they have to pay but they snatch from us

Our leaders are only supporting population growth by fertilizing more land.

 

[Super Falcon]

Our leaders are only supporting population growth by fertilizing more land.

We lack visionary leader with a plan

 

[ThunderCat]

We lack visionary leader with a plan

We do not have the right ecological analysis. Daniel Quinn and David Pimentel should just as well have become our ministers of ecology and they would have solved most of it for us.

 

[ThunderCat]

Here they are continuing to build irrigation canals in the 60s. If only they knew the future disaster they were creating: