Donatello
RETIRED TTA
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2009
- Messages
- 10,531
- Reaction score
- 23
- Country
- Location
Yea man, Indians understand the law very well, as shown by the BBC film. Maybe that is why India banned it.
Watch banned film "India's daughter" here!
- Thread starter by78
- Start date
Yea man, Indians understand the law very well, as shown by the BBC film. Maybe that is why India banned it.
SpArK
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 5, 2010
- Messages
- 22,519
- Reaction score
- 18
- Country
- Location
We watched it on Youtube and protested the ban.
Youtube itself was banned there because for the reasons god only knows....
Yes you do have more freedom there.
Koovie
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 20, 2012
- Messages
- 8,288
- Reaction score
- 6
Law only applies to specific borders. And due to the Internet, such bans have rarely the desired effect.... it actually is more of an advertisement to watch the film.
By now it has been watched and shared on social media countless times...
MokshaVimukthi
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2014
- Messages
- 1,960
- Reaction score
- -18
- Country
- Location
Thank you for proving my point.
.............. hence the need to not hand over propaganda material to the BBC
Bang Galore
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2010
- Messages
- 10,685
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
The same reason Sushma Swaraj went nuts at the march about Kashmir in the UK....because they are crazy. She gave importance to some march no one would have been interested in & now Rajnath Singh has done the same to this documentary which would not have had a viewership as big as it will now. Those who want to see gory stuff will be looking at ISIS videos, the world won't be shocked about a rape& murder in Delhi but the government's overreaction certainly guarantees attention.
MokshaVimukthi
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2014
- Messages
- 1,960
- Reaction score
- -18
- Country
- Location
...... Ever heard of intentional law ? or contracts between companies of two different countries ?
Gibbs
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2013
- Messages
- 7,319
- Reaction score
- 7
- Country
- Location
Shocking.. The doc is not just about rape and the brutal murder of Jyoti Singh.. Or the propagation of a psychopathic rapist murderer .. It's about the status of women in society
Hope people will watch it without preconceived notions of bias.. Truly a eye opener
Hope people will watch it without preconceived notions of bias.. Truly a eye opener
MokshaVimukthi
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2014
- Messages
- 1,960
- Reaction score
- -18
- Country
- Location
LOL..... how wonderful that BBC uses Indian criminals to highlight status of women in Indian society
........... seriously ? in which parallel universe ? 
Guynextdoor2
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2013
- Messages
- 12,286
- Reaction score
- -42
- Country
- Location
I thik most mischief has been done by Timesnow which has run campaigns calling it an 'insult to nirbhaya'. I guess they didn't like that NDTV would get credit for airing the documentary. And they were positively RABID aout it for the last 2 days. Punish them! Tweet and ask to Punish them! and stuff.
T90TankGuy
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2010
- Messages
- 9,427
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
It was done very well , dont know what the fuss is about , its not as if we do not have a problem in India with mindsets of people such as the rapist.
Koovie
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 20, 2012
- Messages
- 8,288
- Reaction score
- 6
intentional law ???? No never heard of intentional laws.
There is no law that prohibits the BBC or whatever company to publish their work whenever they want to... freedom of press.
Unless you can show me which law prohibits them from doing so.... and since its already online, absolutely nobody can stop it from spreading until nobody is interested in it anymore. NOT EVEN SUPAH MODI!
SRP
BANNED
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2013
- Messages
- 2,460
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
no country for young women
No, Jyoti Singh is not India’s daughter
India’s Daughter, Leslee Udwin’s documentary on the brutal gang-rape of Jyoti Singh in 2012, was aired tonight in the UK on BBC Four.
It’s a hard documentary to watch, because it’s a terrible story to tell: A young woman gets brutally raped and tortured to death by six men. It’s horrifying enough without adding the details, and the film has plenty: Her dreams of being a doctor, paid for by her parent’s small savings and by her nights at the call centre; the rapists’ hatred of the fact that she was a woman and she was out, with a male friend; her belief that women could do anything; the description of how one of them pulled her insides out, wrapped them in cloth, and threw them out of a moving bus.
This is, of course, no reason to consider it “an international conspiracy to defame India” as parliamentary affairs minister, M Venkaiah Naidu, said, nor to ban its screening. The outrage that government officials have showed towards this documentary will end up helping its success—no one will listen to the critics because everyone will be too busy celebrating it against the myopic stands of the people in power. “There is no rape in India” may well become the new “there is no poverty in India”—remember Slumdog Millionaire? The Indian government has guaranteed the film immediate international success and the heroic status that comes with being banned. It is sad because the documentary could have used some critical scrutiny.
There is much in this film that could be broader, stronger: If you strip the story itself, the brutality of the crime and the excellence of the victim, it fails to truly embody the larger issues of gender violence and the feminist movement in India. At the end, it only hints to what’s beyond this one case and its characters.
The documentary lacks the strength to point to the roots of the problem. Take the title, India’s Daughter. Why? Isn’t that a quintessentially patriarchal label to give Jyoti Singh? She wasn’t India’s daughter. She was India’s promising medicine student. She was Delhi’s fierce citizen, who would stop a policeman from beating up the kid who just stole her purse. She was the fearless woman who stood up against the men who would then kill her—because she would not take being bullied, she would not just do as she were told.
And how can India claim her making, when she was a dreamer—dare we say it—despite India, not because of it? What did India give Jyoti Singh? Not a society that respected her. Not an education for which her family didn’t have to sacrifice every little thing. Not even a safe bus to take home.
The rapists—Mukesh Singh who recounts his crime and talks to the camera without showing the slightest regret (nor a full understanding of the inconceivable gravity of his actions) and his criminal companions—aren’t they, perhaps, India’s real sons? “What kind of human beings are these?” asks former chief of justice Leila Seth in the film. They are, let’s repeat it, India’s sons. The product of poor education, of centuries of patriarchy, and of violence, poverty and impunity.
It is perhaps easier to explain (which doesn’t in the slightest mean justify) the rapists’ crooked logic, than understand the miracle that someone like Jyoti Singh—who grew up in poverty yet believed and proved that “a girl can do anything”—could exist in India. She is the outlier and so is her family, so are the men and women who took the streets time and again to protest the crimes against women. Her parents were proud and brave in speaking her name when everyone around them had preferred to call her Nirbhaya—to protect her identity as if she had something to hide.
India is not a country of rapists. But 70% of Indian women are subject of domestic violence, and a crime is committed against women in the country every three minutes. When is India going to face that? Yes, men rape all over the world. But how does that change the situation in India?
India isn’t Jyoti Singh. India is A.P. Singh, the defence lawyer who still stands by his statement that he would have burnt his own daughter were she found “disgracing herself”—his way of referring to having contact with men. India is the policeman in charge of the investigation who talks about the great job done in finding the rape’s culprits, and guarantees Delhi is a very safe city “even for women.” India is the government who is more worried about a documentary that might taint the country’s image than about the fact that it depicts an horrific truth. India is M.L. Sharma, the other defence lawyer interviewed in the documentary. In his words about women, in how he sophisticatedly compares them to flowers and diamonds, transpires an unsettling disgust—perhaps even more troubling than the raw, uneducated violence of the rapists.
His description of India, of all that was said in the film, lingers.
“We have the best culture. In our culture, there is no space for a woman.”
Has this culture changed at all, in the past two years? Or did it just have a moment there, at the end of 2012 (the protests are almost an extra in the documentary)? Did we then just go back to asking that the murderers get hung, that the juvenile gets tried, that the rotten apples get thrown away while fresh ones rot away in peace?
No, Jyoti Singh is not India’s daughter – Quartz
No, Jyoti Singh is not India’s daughter
India’s Daughter, Leslee Udwin’s documentary on the brutal gang-rape of Jyoti Singh in 2012, was aired tonight in the UK on BBC Four.
It’s a hard documentary to watch, because it’s a terrible story to tell: A young woman gets brutally raped and tortured to death by six men. It’s horrifying enough without adding the details, and the film has plenty: Her dreams of being a doctor, paid for by her parent’s small savings and by her nights at the call centre; the rapists’ hatred of the fact that she was a woman and she was out, with a male friend; her belief that women could do anything; the description of how one of them pulled her insides out, wrapped them in cloth, and threw them out of a moving bus.
This is, of course, no reason to consider it “an international conspiracy to defame India” as parliamentary affairs minister, M Venkaiah Naidu, said, nor to ban its screening. The outrage that government officials have showed towards this documentary will end up helping its success—no one will listen to the critics because everyone will be too busy celebrating it against the myopic stands of the people in power. “There is no rape in India” may well become the new “there is no poverty in India”—remember Slumdog Millionaire? The Indian government has guaranteed the film immediate international success and the heroic status that comes with being banned. It is sad because the documentary could have used some critical scrutiny.
There is much in this film that could be broader, stronger: If you strip the story itself, the brutality of the crime and the excellence of the victim, it fails to truly embody the larger issues of gender violence and the feminist movement in India. At the end, it only hints to what’s beyond this one case and its characters.
The documentary lacks the strength to point to the roots of the problem. Take the title, India’s Daughter. Why? Isn’t that a quintessentially patriarchal label to give Jyoti Singh? She wasn’t India’s daughter. She was India’s promising medicine student. She was Delhi’s fierce citizen, who would stop a policeman from beating up the kid who just stole her purse. She was the fearless woman who stood up against the men who would then kill her—because she would not take being bullied, she would not just do as she were told.
And how can India claim her making, when she was a dreamer—dare we say it—despite India, not because of it? What did India give Jyoti Singh? Not a society that respected her. Not an education for which her family didn’t have to sacrifice every little thing. Not even a safe bus to take home.
The rapists—Mukesh Singh who recounts his crime and talks to the camera without showing the slightest regret (nor a full understanding of the inconceivable gravity of his actions) and his criminal companions—aren’t they, perhaps, India’s real sons? “What kind of human beings are these?” asks former chief of justice Leila Seth in the film. They are, let’s repeat it, India’s sons. The product of poor education, of centuries of patriarchy, and of violence, poverty and impunity.
It is perhaps easier to explain (which doesn’t in the slightest mean justify) the rapists’ crooked logic, than understand the miracle that someone like Jyoti Singh—who grew up in poverty yet believed and proved that “a girl can do anything”—could exist in India. She is the outlier and so is her family, so are the men and women who took the streets time and again to protest the crimes against women. Her parents were proud and brave in speaking her name when everyone around them had preferred to call her Nirbhaya—to protect her identity as if she had something to hide.
India is not a country of rapists. But 70% of Indian women are subject of domestic violence, and a crime is committed against women in the country every three minutes. When is India going to face that? Yes, men rape all over the world. But how does that change the situation in India?
India isn’t Jyoti Singh. India is A.P. Singh, the defence lawyer who still stands by his statement that he would have burnt his own daughter were she found “disgracing herself”—his way of referring to having contact with men. India is the policeman in charge of the investigation who talks about the great job done in finding the rape’s culprits, and guarantees Delhi is a very safe city “even for women.” India is the government who is more worried about a documentary that might taint the country’s image than about the fact that it depicts an horrific truth. India is M.L. Sharma, the other defence lawyer interviewed in the documentary. In his words about women, in how he sophisticatedly compares them to flowers and diamonds, transpires an unsettling disgust—perhaps even more troubling than the raw, uneducated violence of the rapists.
His description of India, of all that was said in the film, lingers.
“We have the best culture. In our culture, there is no space for a woman.”
Has this culture changed at all, in the past two years? Or did it just have a moment there, at the end of 2012 (the protests are almost an extra in the documentary)? Did we then just go back to asking that the murderers get hung, that the juvenile gets tried, that the rotten apples get thrown away while fresh ones rot away in peace?
No, Jyoti Singh is not India’s daughter – Quartz
Turingsage
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2014
- Messages
- 2,304
- Reaction score
- -23
- Country
- Location
Do not defend this stupid ban. Do not kill the messenger. Do not pretend that because rapes occur elsewhere India should not be singled out (it isnt). Do not provide excuses reasons explanations etc for acts that are clearly unjustifiable. Do protect your daughters sisters mothers etc from a misogynistic culture that needs reform.
This is not about India or nationalism, its about making a just society and Hindus should whole heartedly embrace it with no ifs and buts.
You must be the change you wish to see in the world
This is not about India or nationalism, its about making a just society and Hindus should whole heartedly embrace it with no ifs and buts.
You must be the change you wish to see in the world
SpArK
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 5, 2010
- Messages
- 22,519
- Reaction score
- 18
- Country
- Location
The father of the Delhi gang-rape victim has spoken out against the ban on the documentary 'India's Daughter' and urged people to watch it, saying the film "holds up a mirror to our society".
Speaking to the Calcutta Telegraph, Badri Nath Singh said: "What the documentary shows is the truth. It holds up a mirror to our society. It's not about this rapist, it is a general statement on what kind of people we create in our society.
"People in India should see this documentary and know these men," he said.
People in India have been defying their government’s ban on the film since it aired in the UK by finding, watching and sharing thefilm online after it was uploaded onto YouTube.
Father tells India to look in the mirror
Speaking to the Calcutta Telegraph, Badri Nath Singh said: "What the documentary shows is the truth. It holds up a mirror to our society. It's not about this rapist, it is a general statement on what kind of people we create in our society.
"People in India should see this documentary and know these men," he said.
People in India have been defying their government’s ban on the film since it aired in the UK by finding, watching and sharing thefilm online after it was uploaded onto YouTube.
Father tells India to look in the mirror
MokshaVimukthi
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2014
- Messages
- 1,960
- Reaction score
- -18
- Country
- Location
intentional law ???? No never heard of intentional laws.
There is no law that prohibits the BBC or whatever company to publish their work whenever they want to... freedom of press.
Unless you can show me which law prohibits them from doing so.... and since its already online, absolutely nobody can stop it from spreading until nobody is interested in it anymore. NOT EVEN SUPAH MODI!
LOL...... are we suppose to admire your Ignorance ?
....... use google and get educated. A contract is a contract. But its clear you have no idea what a contract is
...... so I leave you to swim in your ocean of ignorance.Similar threads
