Warning no 69: Step back from Doklam to avoid confrontation - PLA Col Lili

[Jackdaws]

are you mixing up 65 with other war? dont have courage to except PN despite being smaller performed well?

What well? Your entire war was to "liberate" Kashmir - you ended up barely defending Lahore and that too because Indians could not believe you had actually left it undefended and so they slowed their march to ensure they weren't walking into a trap.

 

[KN-1]

Sure, you guys seems happy about the status quo you have reached after you started the invasion.

We started in Kashmir alone, rest you invaded IB not Pakistan.. it was same on either side, we being smaller have much more to cherish that we despite being overwhelmed did great damage to enemy in air, on land and offcourse how can we forget fishing port dawarka

 

[gslv mk3]

We started in Kashmir alone, rest you invaded IB not Pakistan.. it was same on either side, we being smaller have much more to cherish that we despite being overwhelmed did great damage to enemy is air, on land and offcourse how can we forget fishing port dawarka

answered in post #137.

 

[Areesh]

Sure...a regular Indian citizen is given exact information whereas even your legislature is denied.

Transparency was never your forte, so I wouldn't be debating about this if I were you.

Legislature is denied by no one except that dumb minister. Much better than what we see after surgical strike drama.

Now go ask your DGMO about that surgical strike drama. He ran from his own press conference and didn't give any details despite numerous questions asked by your own journalists.

 

[KN-1]

What well? Your entire war was to "liberate" Kashmir

Yeah, but you couldnt held much smaller force in Kashmir so you invaded IB from three regions and end up losing biggest tank battle of the war.. more jets in the air, and a fishing port as @gslv mk3 said

 

[gslv mk3]

Legislature is denied by no one except that dumb minister.

Sure... these lies can comfort an average Pakistani.

 

[Areesh]

you ended up barely defending Lahore and that too because Indians could not believe you had actually left it undefended and so they slowed their march to ensure they weren't walking into a trap.

So that is the reason your pussy army gave you for not conquering Lahore?

What excuse they gave you for Sialkot?

 

[Dash]

I never knew Chinese to be so sissies.

 

[Areesh]

Sure... these lies can comfort an average Pakistani.

Go get some details about surgical strike that you whole country foolishly celebrated before worrying about Pakistani casualties.

 

[gslv mk3]

Go get some details about surgical strike that you whole country foolishly celebrated before worrying about Pakistani casualties.

Why should they release any info more than what was released by them ?

It's much different from denying deaths at LoC saying 'we don't want our enemy to know it'.

 

[KN-1]

So that is the reason your pussy army gave you for not conquering Lahore?

What excuse they gave you for Sialkot?

lol, such generous bharati who leave our territories are only found on bollywood media, not his fault, north korea level propagnda insan ko kya se kya bana deta hai

 

[Areesh]

lol, such generous bharati who leave our territories are only found on bollywood media, not his fault, north korea level propagnda insan ko kya se kya bana deta hai

They didn't conquer Lahore because it was apparently undefended

They didn't conquer Sialkot because they don't like its food

They returned Haji Pir pass because Ayub khan was too cute

They lost land in Sindh sector because it was too hot to fight.

 

[deckingraj]

It is really important to name calling?? Let me try to ignore it...this one time

so you clown trying to say 40000 were enough to control mutiny in territory more populated then west Pakistan?

Listen...either your top brass was a clown...who thought...they can control mutiny in territory more populated then west Pakistan...or you are misinformed/naive? I will let you decide there...having said that we are talking about 70's....media was controlled and PA hit hard all the institutions(college/elites etc - source of revolutions) with brute force.....there is enough material out there to enlighten, if one wishes to....having said that not one time you have explained...why on this earth PA would do any attempt to save east Pakistan from falling knowing very well that 40K is not good enough?? Were they desperate to surrender?? Care to explain what was the itch there?

 

[Areesh]

Why should they release any info more than what was released by them ?

Because a lot of people in India are doubt about those strikes. Pretty simple.

It's much different from denying deaths at LoC saying 'we don't want our enemy to know it'.

Nothing seems much difference. At least we have ISPR who gives details of all casualties when they happen. In India's case nobody knows what happened and what was achieved.

 

[SingaporeGuy]

yeap when the bodies start piling dont cry to yer parents