S10
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2009
- Messages
- 6,066
- Reaction score
- -21
- Country
- Location
The original wording is “连续”,contineous lock. As far as the claim that Su-30MK2 is the best available in PLAAF, LOL! PLAAF doesn't even operate them and they are certainly NOT the best.The same very sentence is being used idiotically to claim that J-10's superiority over Su 30MK2 by some Chinese boys.......what makes it even funnier is that the same Su 30MK2 is the best available combat plane in the PLAAF.......and on top of that the confidence part.
First of all, the lock on was contineous. Second, the Vietnamese Su-30s were jammed throughout. I wonder how they're planning to locate our AWACS, let alone shoot it down when they're completely blinded by our electronic countermeasure suites. Pull out their pistols and shoot?Use of AWACS means J-10s had all the time in the world to flank the Su 30MK2 without being noticed.......upto such an extent that they won't be able to disengage the Su 30MK2 from a solid lock.......even high quality data feed of the position of flankers would've been available via powerful AESA radars being used onboard the AWACS.......plus high Intensity ECM to literally jam the electronics on Su 30MK2.......yet they fail to lock 11 times and finally get a good lock on 12th attempt as mentioned by some Chinese boys and ''Papu'' who ever he is.......just wondering the case when the opponent would have AWACS killer AAMs and proper electronic onboard with AWACS support......what would J-10 jockeys would do......I guess Its not hard to understand that with even pea sized brain.
The air division that operates Vietnamese Su-30's are the best air division in Vietnamese air force. If they're being outmatched easily, then they're not exactly a challenge to China.Russians don't sell high quality equipment to 3rd world countries and Its easy to understand why......
......The Su 30Mk2 are new to Vietnamese Airforce and I don't think that they even manage 50-80 hours/annum on them thanks to their economic conditions.......where as a flanker jockey without 1000+ hours on the bird with atleast 150-200 hours/ammun is called a newbie......they aren't F-16......that even lesser training would do.
Source??go through all the posts in this thread and ''Papu'' who ever that guy is....
And again we have Copp for the 3rd time............why don't you read his works on J-10.....and Chinese radar and SAM systems.......or wait I'll personally mail him to write an article on JF-17......
I've already mentioned who pupu is in other threads, so don't feel like explaining it again.