Exactly, the OP mentions that the locks were continuous, so by that you can interpret that it was locked on a dozen different occasions, rather than broken 11 times.
I agree with you. This post on PDF is for joke.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exactly, the OP mentions that the locks were continuous, so by that you can interpret that it was locked on a dozen different occasions, rather than broken 11 times.
VAF haven't any advanced air combat system and multi-agent System
poor VAF only have several su30mkk.
It is impossible to win PLAAF
you spoke N times about your S-300, AAA system and fake target in this threadYep, it's impposible for VNAF to win PLAAF coz VN don't have enough money to spend in AF, but VNAF is not your main opponent, S-300, AAA system and fake target are your Biggest obstacle
What is this ??it's your Mig 21 ??During Border conflic, you could not recognize the diffrent between the Real and the Fake , now you think this Craft can help you ??you spoke N times about your S-300, AAA system and fake target in this thread
you know we have countless j7 uav . it is very easy to find them .then these aim will be utterly destroyedby intermediate range ballistic missile.
]
What is this ??it's your Mig 21 ??During Border conflic, you could not recognize the diffrent between the Real and the Fake , now you think this Craft can help you ??
1st we don't lock on any thing which is already locked so you can lock 12 times only if it is broken 11 times......now what I am asking what kind of avionics does J-10 contain that even degraded electronics were able to break the lock a dozen times that to with an amateur Vietnamese pilot............and about the confidence part......a professional doesn't show their moral and emotions on the battle feild.
Try doing that in a battlefield and I'll pary for you..........do you even know what a real combat situation demands......failing the to lock even 3-4 times and would end the game for you.......and what makes it even pathetic is that AWACS datalink was being used.......plus the newbie Vietnamese pilot on a downgraded flanker.
, Oki, now I know why your Gov. ban the foreign website, coz if they don't ban, Chinese will realize that: They're not Powerfull as they thinkyou know we still have EW's means.All your vietnam 's S-300, AAA system will have no function in face of PLAAF
The Bollywoodaydreamers and No1 Weapons importer have contributed nothing, all avionics and software of the SU-30MKI are Israelis, made by Israel and imported from Israel. If India was so good in manufacturing avionics, it would not have imported all its weapons and technology from the West, while it would have long been able to manufacture its own aircraft, buillet train while in the case of China, despite western technological embargoes it has been able to produce its own bulltet train, constructing the longest world sea bridge, and producing mostly its own weaponry and technology. Even in the case of civil software China will surpass India.
That "someone" occured to be a PLAAF officer in China, who served as liason to Pakistan previously. He was also active with negotiating with Russians when China purchased Su-27/Su-30 from Russia. Basically, since the Chinese military is quite secretive, he's the only few reliable sources available.
Vietnam can't afford to play with these toys, so Su-30MK2 will still become useless for them to put it against China.
Russia made is slowly rotten, also be aware the Russians always make troubles to the buyer to blackmail more money.
Indian friend should know that well.
How did you come to the conclusion that the Chinese AWACS are pathetic?
AWACS are usually used to detect targets at long range and direct fighters to these targets.
However, it is usually the combination of the missiles guidance system and the fighters fire-control radar that gives a lock.
The Su-30's may have broken the missile lock themselves, or it could have been the case that the J-10 pilots were simply toying with them and playing psychological mind-games.
The OP did mention the Su-30 pilots losing much confidence and becoming demoralised.
Did he reveal any sensitive details? No.For a country with such tight censorship and internet regulation I find it strange that this supposed PLAAF officer is divulging such information.
Did he reveal any sensitive details? No.
All he did was stated J-10 toyed with Vietnamese Su-30s at will and kept their radars jammed throughout the entire incident. Considering China had operated Su-30 since the mid 1990's, knowing their weaknesses is nothing to be surprised about.
Here is another bit he revealed. It was planned to bring Vietnamese to the negotiating table by letting them know they're outmatched even at their doorsteps. It worked, since Vietnamese defence minister went to negotiate in Bejing the very next week.I never used the word 'sensitive', but if the incident really did happen it is not something you would want to reveal. Word travels fast, the last thing you would want would be politicians and other government officials to see this incident as a provocation that may warrant a response, or a modernization/build up of the military.
How do you know the lock was broken ten times.. or it was locked on on ten different occasions??
Reaching demeaning conclusions based on a single sentence??
How do you know that??
Why is using an AWACS datalink pathetic?? I find it innovative, especially in a real combat situation.. to be able to get target data quicker..
the Americans use something called JTIDS.. unless they are pathetic too.. in which case , you can keep your definition of Air combat with yourself.
How do you know the Viet flanker is downgraded vs the Chinese Flanker.. and the pilot was a newbie??
Do you have intel sources or something?? Blog??.. Dr Kopp maybe??
You arent opinionated.. you are biased.. and that bias is making some really weird claims here.
Exactly, the OP mentions that the locks were continuous, so by that you can interpret that it was locked on a dozen different occasions, rather than broken 11 times.