What's new

US brings fight vs China telco to PH

striver44

BANNED
Joined
Jul 25, 2016
Messages
4,832
Reaction score
-16
Country
Indonesia
Location
Indonesia
By: Ben O. de Vera - 5 days ago

base station network operator. 5G. 4G, 3G mobile technologies.

The United States can help finance a shift to other vendors among private firms, including telcos in the Philippines, currently partnering with Chinese tech giants Huawei and ZTE as Washington continued to flag concerns on security risks from China.

In a teleconference Thursday night, US Department of State Undersecretary Keith Krach said “Huawei’s deals with telecommunications operators around the world are evaporating because countries are only allowing trusted vendors in their 5G networks,” citing Albania, Australia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Greece, Israel, Japan, Latvia, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Romania, Sweden and Taiwan.

Krach reiterated that the United States trusted only European vendors Ericsson and Nokia as well as South Korean giant Samsung.


“The momentum in favor of securing 5G is building. The more countries, companies and citizens ask whom they should trust with the most sensitive data, the more obvious the answer becomes: not the Chinese Communist Party’s surveillance state,” Krach said.





“When countries are choosing their 5G systems, this is definitely the time to do a rip-and-replace, a transition … And that’s where there are a lot of financing tools, and those kinds of things, that I think many countries like us [the United States] are willing to help provide, because we recognize this danger,” according to Krach.

Here in the Philippines, the duopoly of telco service providers—PLDT Inc. and Globe Telecom Inc.—had yet to roll out 5G on a massive scale.

Globe currently has very limited 5G coverage in Metro Manila, while PLDT has none yet.

Both telcos earlier partnered with Huawei, so it may be hard for PLDT and Globe to abandon the Chinese connection given network compatibility, on top of cheaper cost.

The incoming third telco provider Dito Telecommunity Corp., supposed to break the duopoly, was also backed by Chinese state-owned China Telecom.


Noting that the Philippines was a “great partner,” Krach said the United States had “expanded our financing capabilities to help countries like the Philippines and others, particularly when they are suffering from this horrific pandemic,” adding that “we are here to help” as far as possible transition of local telco from Huawei was concerned.

Last week, US State Department spokesperson Morgan Ortagus told the Inquirer that while Chinese vendors were cheaper, “they come with a hidden cost—the security of networks and privacy.”

“In strong contrast to subsidized financing by the [government] of China, US investment and financing tools are based on principles of transparency, sustainability and free and fair competition. The State Department is working with the United States International Development Finance Corp. and the US Export-Import Bank on project financing solutions. The United States government stands ready to deploy the full range of financing and export promotion tools to help wireless carriers and governments procure equipment and services from trusted vendors,” Ortagus said in an email.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/business.inquirer.net/300533/us-urges-ph-to-shun-chinese-5g-network/amp
 
.
this sounds like it is using taxpayer money to fund purchases in foreign countries, from foreign companies. the only thing American here is the money.

@Figaro is this a responsible use of our taxes?
 
.
this sounds like it is using taxpayer money to fund purchases in foreign countries, from foreign companies. the only thing American here is the money.

@Figaro is this a responsible use of our taxes?
Lol honestly I don't know where our tax dollars even go anymore. I have seen marginal improvement (and some obvious declines) over the last few decades in the US. The peak was in the late 90s and early 2000s. As usual, our tax dollars are getting squandered in useless foreign projects and aid (especially military aid).
 
.
“The momentum in favor of securing 5G is building. The more countries, companies and citizens ask whom they should trust with the most sensitive data, the more obvious the answer becomes: not the Chinese Communist Party’s surveillance state,” Krach said.

And guess who tapped our President's (and other top ranking officials) mobile phones during the 3G era... o_Oo_O

Slide5DSD_cropped.jpg

Slide3DSD_cropped.jpg


https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/18/australia-tried-to-monitor-indonesian-presidents-phone

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/19/tony-abbott-no-apology-explanation-indonesia-spying

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/fed...-in-phone-tapping-fallout-20131122-2y1p6.html

And even the President's wife... :woot::woot:

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/...-sbys-wife-the-last-straw-20131121-2xx4e.html

Or even Angela Merkel's mobile phone...

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/23/us-monitored-angela-merkel-german

So very trusted partner indeed... :rofl:
 
.
Everyone knows the Chinese surveillance claims are all BS. It's just a strategic ploy to undermine Chinese companies by the US gov (honestly a smart move because China is our most serious economic competitor since WWII). Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to be working though ... the NSA leak back in 2013 really damage the US surveillance reputation.
 
.
In a teleconference Thursday night, US Department of State Undersecretary Keith Krach said “Huawei’s deals with telecommunications operators around the world are evaporating because countries are only allowing trusted vendors in their 5G networks,” citing Albania, Australia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Greece, Israel, Japan, Latvia, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Romania, Sweden and Taiwan.

Krach reiterated that the United States trusted only European vendors Ericsson and Nokia as well as South Korean giant Samsung.


“The momentum in favor of securing 5G is building. The more countries, companies and citizens ask whom they should trust with the most sensitive data, the more obvious the answer becomes: not the Chinese Communist Party’s surveillance state,” Krach said.
Yes,they should trust ECHELON instead,I`m sure they`re totally trustworthy,right....?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON
 
.
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom