Philip the Arab
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2018
- Messages
- 7,430
- Reaction score
- 6
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@JamD We could've been making this.The Saber missile is a ALCM with 1200kg weight, 290km range, a 200kg payload, SATCOM guidance, 0.8 mach speed and a turbofan.
Halcon from the UAE is also developing an anti ship missile called the HAS-250.
@Bilal Khan (Quwa) @JamD @Indos @The SC @Zarvan
View attachment 793251
View attachment 793252
View attachment 793253
The Saber missile is a ALCM with 1200kg weight, 290km range, a 200kg payload, SATCOM guidance, 0.8 mach speed and a turbofan.
Halcon from the UAE is also developing an anti ship missile called the HAS-250.
@Bilal Khan (Quwa) @JamD @Indos @The SC @Zarvan
View attachment 793251
View attachment 793252
View attachment 793253
We have been making RAAD and then RAAD-2. The expertise has been there for the decade now, isn’t it? Then why “could have been”?@JamD We could've been making this.
We don't have a conventionally-focused ALCM. Something small, <300 km, and low-cost. It's likely to do with the knowledge for that being split across different departments in the industry, so no room for horizontal collaboration.We have been making RAAD and then RAAD-2. The expertise has been there for the decade now, isn’t it? Then why “could have been”?
We don't have a conventionally-focused ALCM. Something small, <300 km, and low-cost. It's likely to do with the knowledge for that being split across different departments in the industry, so no room for horizontal collaboration.
Same evolution as Nasr to Fatah MRLS. When they feel the need, they will develop it I guess.We don't have a conventionally-focused ALCM. Something small, <300 km, and low-cost. It's likely to do with the knowledge for that being split across different departments in the industry, so no room for horizontal collaboration.
@JamD We could've been making this.
We have been making RAAD and then RAAD-2. The expertise has been there for the decade now, isn’t it? Then why “could have been”?
We don't have a conventionally-focused ALCM. Something small, <300 km, and low-cost. It's likely to do with the knowledge for that being split across different departments in the industry, so no room for horizontal collaboration.
PAF's focus was on glide bombs for Stand of range weapons.so that's may be the reason AWC didn't develop something like Raad-lite.
Another reason may be that AWC after developing Raad 2 (it's a recent development),started working on next Supersonic air launched cruise missile along with NESCOM,so they may not had time to develop conventional version of Raad.
Same evolution as Nasr to Fatah MRLS. When they feel the need, they will develop it I guess.
HAve many differences with UAE regarding their politics but DAMN they are really making their mark here!!!!!!!!!!The Saber missile is a ALCM with 1200kg weight, 290km range, a 200kg payload, SATCOM guidance, 0.8 mach speed and a turbofan.
Halcon from the UAE is also developing an anti ship missile called the HAS-250.
@Bilal Khan (Quwa) @JamD @Indos @The SC @Zarvan
View attachment 793251
View attachment 793252
View attachment 793253
They took advantage of Denel dying and it seems to be paying off slowly but surely.HAve many differences with UAE regarding their politics but DAMN they are really making their mark here!!!!!!!!!!
There isn’t any other explanation other than there wasn’t a the need for it. Otherwise, the options ranged from developing that class of ALCM to outright buying and neither were exercised.I suspect (read hope) that the PAF decided it wasn't worth lobbing conventional small Ra'ad-lites when you can do the job with IREK and REK-III. Those would certainly be cheaper in the 100-200 km range.
There is a 200-350 km conventional SOW gap but the PAF probably doesn't feel its worth filling it. This is where the Ra'ad-Lite/Saber would fit in. Maybe its a cost thing. Maybe its the reliability of a cheap system (GPS denied environments etc).
I'm just trying to justify the current state of affairs with what you see in the most optimistic way.
It's a cost thing IMO. Manufacturing a 'Ra'ad-Lite' is way more affordable for the US than it is for Pakistan because we're (1) likely importing the core inputs and (2) can't support the fixed overhead of higher-output ALCM production. However, if the PAF floated a requirement to the private sector and enabled the latter to build capacity, I think we could see an affordable Saber/Ra'ad-Lite type ALCM in 5-7 years, if not sooner.I suspect (read hope) that the PAF decided it wasn't worth lobbing conventional small Ra'ad-lites when you can do the job with IREK and REK-III. Those would certainly be cheaper in the 100-200 km range.
There is a 200-350 km conventional SOW gap but the PAF probably doesn't feel its worth filling it. This is where the Ra'ad-Lite/Saber would fit in. Maybe its a cost thing. Maybe its the reliability of a cheap system (GPS denied environments etc).
I'm just trying to justify the current state of affairs with what you see in the most optimistic way.
Why do we need an ALCM with 300 km at all ?We don't have a conventionally-focused ALCM. Something small, <300 km, and low-cost. It's likely to do with the knowledge for that being split across different departments in the industry, so no room for horizontal collaboration.
I suspect (read hope) that the PAF decided it wasn't worth lobbing conventional small Ra'ad-lites when you can do the job with IREK and REK-III. Those would certainly be cheaper in the 100-200 km range.
There is a 200-350 km conventional SOW gap but the PAF probably doesn't feel its worth filling it. This is where the Ra'ad-Lite/Saber would fit in. Maybe its a cost thing. Maybe its the reliability of a cheap system (GPS denied environments etc).
I'm just trying to justify the current state of affairs with what you see in the most optimistic way.