kingdurgaking
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2010
- Messages
- 1,962
- Reaction score
- -2
@Sancho.. i have one OT question... is shiv in BRF = shiv aroor of livefist(headlines today)?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Sancho.. i have one OT question... is shiv in BRF = shiv aroor of livefist(headlines today)?
Again, that's what you believe only, the point you are missing here is, that they don't have to sell them now and can wait till they get a replacement, but we have not the time to wait, till those fighters will be available. Qatar just recently stated that they invite all vendors for a competition to replace these M2Ks, so things will be delayed even further. UAE is even more difficult, because they have big wishes around the deal. So no, second hand M2Ks are not going to happen anymore.
when IAF can buy sacond hand mig-21 , why not a mirage...
Coz, we are not in a position now, when we bought them in past.. simple..
45 squadrens?, why do we need 45 squadrens?do IAF now has 45 squadrens..?
45 squadrens?, why do we need 45 squadrens?
when IAF can buy sacond hand mig-21 , why not a mirage...
45 squadrens?, why do we need 45 squadrens?
No, I have read somewhere, IAF might reach 39.5 by 2020 which is acceptable but it does need to reach 45 by 2025.do IAF now has 45 squadrens..?
No, I have read somewhere, IAF might reach 39.5 by 2020 which is acceptable but it does need to reach 45 by 2025.
@ Archie
I forgot, i read somewhere the rate at which US is producing F35. 200 fighters per year. This would definitely bring down the cost of production.
I think the joint production of FGFA or PakFa should be in India with the capacity like that of F35, if Ind and Russia wants to reduce the cost of the new 5th gen fighter.
It is the minimum strength of squadrons sanctioned by MoD.
It must be fulfilled in order to strengthen our security.
Coz, as one member says "we are not in a position now, when we were in past.. simple..