What's new

Turkish Unmanned Vehicle Programs

There should be a way to bend those rules. If not then it's a shame.
We dont need white phosphorus, we are already working on a armed drone called Anka TP. @cabatli_53 can you help me out?

AnkaTPcirit_zps56f3667d.jpg
 
in war when it comes to protect own land eg invasion or occupation then I would say kiss my *** and eat phosphor, napalm and biological weapons..

as if US did not use really worse weapons for much lower reasons..
 
in war when it comes to protect own land eg invasion or occupation then I would say kiss my *** and eat phosphor, napalm and biological weapons..

as if US did not use really worse weapons for much lower reasons..

Now here is someone that gets me
 
in war when it comes to protect own land eg invasion or occupation then I would say kiss my *** and eat phosphor, napalm and biological weapons..

as if US did not use really worse weapons for much lower reasons..
The problem is those weapons cant really be used defensive, they are there to attack large areas with mass destruction, lets say Turkey gets invaded, where do you wanna use it, against own population?
 
The problem is those weapons cant really be used defensive, they are there to attack large areas with mass destruction, lets say Turkey gets invaded, where do you wanna use it, against own population?
They could be used preemptatively
 
against own population

against occupiers population.. or in unpopulated hills.. or when cities are left my excample is ayn al arab the population left and then you could use it there it would destroy it but it would make the occupier loose many troops..

but I know its bad PR

except biological weapons from which destroy the area for years or decades the two other could be used
 
against occupiers population.. or in unpopulated hills.. or when cities are left my excample is ayn al arab the population left and then you could use it there it would destroy it but it would make the occupier loose many troops..

but I know its bad PR

except biological weapons from which destroy the area for years or decades the two other could be used
When a occupier starts a invasion then hes most probably gonna set up a base which ist a big areal, conventional weapons are more than enough for the purpose.

Napalm for exsample was invented for guerillas in Jungle for effectively destroying large areas where a invisible enemy was waiting.
And for biological weapons, it think there isnt much to discuss.
 
When a occupier starts a invasion then hes most probably gonna set up a base which ist a big areal, conventional weapons are more than enough for the purpose.

Yes but the psychological effects of white phosphorus are deeper. Imagine burning alive and hearing everyone around you going through the same thing. Even if you survive the initial onslaught imagine slowly dying from multiple organ failures since you breathed in the stuff
 
Yes but the psychological effects of white phosphorus are deeper. Imagine burning alive and hearing everyone around you going through the same thing. Even if you survive the initial onslaught imagine slowly dying from multiple organ failures since you breathed in the stuff
o_O And why do we need this?
 
@xenon54

I think it's best if weaponised phosphorus were to be deployed in certain situations as a conventional weapon. That's it.

o_O And why do we need this?

To quite literally burn away the enemies spirit to oppose us.
 
Back
Top Bottom