Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, I think its saying YPG, the military wing has retrated from Tel Rifat, after it was taken for the first time. They are trying to say there are no YPG militants and FSA has been threatening civilians, thats what I understood.
SDF should not be allowed to advance to Bab. Rain hell on them.
But if Tel Rifaat is under FSA control, who cares about their progress towards al Bab? From a strategic perspective, this doesn't make sense to me. If they cut off their supply routes, all YPG forces in the east area of Tal Rifaat will be defeated one by one afterwards. Is this the reason why the FSA forces are fighting on the Tal Rifaat front mainly?
If SDF is allowed to take Al Bab then we are likely not going to take it back, there is a high possibility that USA will protect them. If Hillary wins its even worse. I don't think Tel Rifaat was in the plan of Ankara. Rebels are probably insisted on it because their minds are still on Aleppo.
I don't share your opinion in this case. Everybody knew that DAESH will retreat towards Al Bab after losing Dabiq & Sawran. That's why Ankara wanted them to attack Tal Rifaat in the first place. They shouldn't be able to reach Al Bab from the west.
Not sure if YPG is trying to create a buffer zone between Assad and FSA or really making a push for Al-Bab.
Rebels cant act on their own in this operation because they know that without turkish support they are f****d up. This is not operation of the rebels. This is operation of Turkey and the rebels are just mercenaries using the opportunity. By this security area established they are ensuring future urgent logistic support if they need it. Just in case the things dont work with Russia.If SDF is allowed to take Al Bab then we are likely not going to take it back, there is a high possibility that USA will protect them. If Hillary wins its even worse. I don't think Tel Rifaat was in the plan of Ankara. Rebels are probably insisted on it because their minds are still on Aleppo.
Plus if SDF grows strong in west of euphrates, we would need to send in our own troops, FSA can't deal with them alone, not enough numbers.
They can't reach Al Bab from west. Their real strenght lies at east. They didn't really tried anyway. I don't think ISIS is gonna defend Al-Bab strongly either. We should have rushed and take it quickly. None of those scenarios would need discuission now.
- Bro, first of all let's not use SDF but use YPG instead....SDF name is just for show, an excuse for YPG forces to invade Arab towns/villages.If SDF is allowed to take Al Bab then we are likely not going to take it back, there is a high possibility that USA will protect them. If Hillary wins its even worse. I don't think Tel Rifaat was in the plan of Ankara. Rebels are probably insisted on it because their minds are still on Aleppo.
Plus if SDF grows strong in west of euphrates, we would need to send in our own troops, FSA can't deal with them alone, not enough numbers.
25 August. Things have changed. ISIS is coming to an end. Their primary strongholds are under threat. Mosul will fall in probably a week. They can't afford men to die in some frontier town.
25 August. Things have changed. ISIS is coming to an end. Their primary strongholds are under threat. Mosul will fall in probably a week. They can't afford men to die in some frontier town.