What's new

Turkey ready to play role in Kashmir settlement

SIndh is not disputed.
we shall do what is required of us, but "Kashmir ban ke rahega Pakistan"
Yea well, that's what you have been saying for a long time. But today, your armed forces will not even try to take Kashmir by open war.
 
.
SIndh is not disputed.
we shall do what is required of us, but "Kashmir ban ke rahega Pakistan"


then dont cry when people infiltrate in your India and blow up your parliament and hotels
I reserve the right to cry and tell the world how nasty people you are... :cry:
and secretly pay back in kind and blame you too for that... :p:
 
.
Tell the whole story. Pakistan attacked India to get Kashmir, and ended up desperately defending Lahore.

We did not start the war, and we did not try to take Pakistani territory. Attacking Lahore was because we knew than attack is the best form of defence. It was Pakistan that started the war with operation grandslam, which resulted in a grand mess. We defended our Kashmir, and we counter attacked to make Pak back off.

We got what we wanted - defending our territory. You dd not get what you wanted - Kashmir.
we attacked disputed territory, you attacked International border, we got what we wanted, to protect Lahore, you didnt get what you wanted, to drink tea in Lahore Cannt
 
.
We were plotting not to be occupied by a mythical kingdom which ought to be re-established.
And you did, you fought, won a new nation. Invaded a small kingdom, that kingdom surrendered to India for protection, India protected the kingdom...there ends the matter. Why raking up old issues.You tried not once or twice but 4 times using force and failed. In all probability you will in future also. Even you know that militarily/diplomatically India wont let go of kashmir. No matter if it's turkey or saudi...result wont be changing right. Why not try peace for a change and convert LOC into IB? We have compromised on AJK in the best interests of the region.
 
.
then dont cry when people infiltrate in your India and blow up your parliament and hotels

Ah, I see. So you will keep sending murderers to shoot at our civilians in railway stations and hotels? Well, we will do our best to prevent them. That's the best we can do, if a neighbouring country openly threatens us with terrorism. After 2008 your countrymen have not been able to do a similar attack. If it happens again, we will cry - because human lives are precious to us. But we will not give Kashmir just because a state sponsor of terrorism makes such threats.

BTW you do know that a lot more explosions and shootings happen in the land of the pure, right?
 
.
Yea well, that's what you have been saying for a long time. But today, your armed forces will not even try to take Kashmir by open war.
because they want a peaceful solution, because then the International community starts crying like they own us both
 
.
we attacked disputed territory, you attacked International border, we got what we wanted, to protect Lahore, you didnt get what you wanted, to drink tea in Lahore Cannt
LOL. Rewriting history? It was Pak that started the war, to get Kashmir. Not India that did it to take Lahore. You thought you could attack Kashmir and we would be on the defensive - we proved that if you attack any inch of our terrritory, not even your biggest cities will be safe. The message was loud and clear, and Pakistan went hurrying back without getting what they came for.
 
.
we attacked disputed territory, you attacked International border, we got what we wanted, to protect Lahore, you didnt get what you wanted, to drink tea in Lahore Cannt

Hahaha... So India waged a war to have tea at Lahore.. Well I thought it was counter move from India to threaten Pakistan of his foolishness to attack our territory. It worked Pakistan did go back.. If we wanted Lahore we would have initiated the war before, don't we?
 
.
Its non of Trurks Matter so better stay out...................

We don't need Pakistan...................But we will not give away an inch of Kashmir..............Period
Now that you scared us,we will for sure stay out of it.
 
. .
Hahaha... So India waged a war to have tea at Lahore.. Well I thought it was counter move from India to threaten Pakistan of his foolishness to attack our territory. It worked Pakistan did go back.. If we wanted Lahore we would have initiated the war before, don't we?
yes you wanted a war, you have always wanted wars, you also started shit on Runn Of Kutch, which also contributed to it

LOL. Rewriting history? It was Pak that started the war, to get Kashmir. Not India that did it to take Lahore. You thought you could attack Kashmir and we would be on the defensive - we proved that if you attack any inch of our terrritory, not even your biggest cities will be safe. The message was loud and clear, and Pakistan went hurrying back without getting what they came for.
dude pls, our biggest of cities didnt get a scratch, the war only occurred in villages and districts, and we pushed you back, not the other way around

I reserve the right to cry and tell the world how nasty people you are...
and secretly pay back in kind and blame you too for that...
continue to cry please

Yea well, that's what you have been saying for a long time. But today, your armed forces will not even try to take Kashmir by open war.
we will see

What more can you do, that you haven't done up till now?
there is always a new strategy
 
.
It's none of your business,do we meddle in your affairs?
From the article,
''Turkey is ready to play its due role for a peaceful settlement of longstanding Kashmir issue and the solution should be acceptable to Pakistan, India and Kashmiri people – the real stakeholders''.

Offering help for a peaceful solution is meddling in your affairs?
 
.
yes you wanted a war, you have always wanted wars, you also started shit on Runn Of Kutch, which also contributed to it


dude pls, our biggest of cities didnt get a scratch, the war only occurred in villages and districts, and we pushed you back, not the other way around


continue to cry please


we will see


there is always a new strategy

It's quite simple:
1) Pak started the war to take Kashmir.
2) Pak ended up defending Lahore instead.

Now you can pretend that to be some great victory, but anybody with half a brain knows what to infer.

Today we are militarily a lot stronger, even the military disparity with Pak is a lot more in our favour, we are prepared to face conventional or sub conventional war, from your terrorists or your army. And we are only going to get stronger every day, so Pak is not going to take our Kashmir. You might realize this when you are 90 years old and Kashmir is still with us. Then it will be your grandkids living with the same dream.

From the article,
''Turkey is ready to play its due role for a peaceful settlement of longstanding Kashmir issue and the solution should be acceptable to Pakistan, India and Kashmiri people – the real stakeholders''.

Offering help for a peaceful solution is meddling in your affairs?
Since the Shimla agreement of 1972, it is a bilateral issue. BTW there is nothing Turkey can do, even if it wanted to - can you tell me something concrete Turkey can bring to the table that will end the issue?
 
. .
From the article,
''Turkey is ready to play its due role for a peaceful settlement of longstanding Kashmir issue and the solution should be acceptable to Pakistan, India and Kashmiri people – the real stakeholders''.

Offering help for a peaceful solution is meddling in your affairs?
I already stated no third party can be allowed since shimla agreement prohibits it.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom