Yea well, that's what you have been saying for a long time. But today, your armed forces will not even try to take Kashmir by open war.SIndh is not disputed.
we shall do what is required of us, but "Kashmir ban ke rahega Pakistan"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yea well, that's what you have been saying for a long time. But today, your armed forces will not even try to take Kashmir by open war.SIndh is not disputed.
we shall do what is required of us, but "Kashmir ban ke rahega Pakistan"
I reserve the right to cry and tell the world how nasty people you are...SIndh is not disputed.
we shall do what is required of us, but "Kashmir ban ke rahega Pakistan"
then dont cry when people infiltrate in your India and blow up your parliament and hotels
we attacked disputed territory, you attacked International border, we got what we wanted, to protect Lahore, you didnt get what you wanted, to drink tea in Lahore CanntTell the whole story. Pakistan attacked India to get Kashmir, and ended up desperately defending Lahore.
We did not start the war, and we did not try to take Pakistani territory. Attacking Lahore was because we knew than attack is the best form of defence. It was Pakistan that started the war with operation grandslam, which resulted in a grand mess. We defended our Kashmir, and we counter attacked to make Pak back off.
We got what we wanted - defending our territory. You dd not get what you wanted - Kashmir.
And you did, you fought, won a new nation. Invaded a small kingdom, that kingdom surrendered to India for protection, India protected the kingdom...there ends the matter. Why raking up old issues.You tried not once or twice but 4 times using force and failed. In all probability you will in future also. Even you know that militarily/diplomatically India wont let go of kashmir. No matter if it's turkey or saudi...result wont be changing right. Why not try peace for a change and convert LOC into IB? We have compromised on AJK in the best interests of the region.We were plotting not to be occupied by a mythical kingdom which ought to be re-established.
then dont cry when people infiltrate in your India and blow up your parliament and hotels
because they want a peaceful solution, because then the International community starts crying like they own us bothYea well, that's what you have been saying for a long time. But today, your armed forces will not even try to take Kashmir by open war.
LOL. Rewriting history? It was Pak that started the war, to get Kashmir. Not India that did it to take Lahore. You thought you could attack Kashmir and we would be on the defensive - we proved that if you attack any inch of our terrritory, not even your biggest cities will be safe. The message was loud and clear, and Pakistan went hurrying back without getting what they came for.we attacked disputed territory, you attacked International border, we got what we wanted, to protect Lahore, you didnt get what you wanted, to drink tea in Lahore Cannt
we attacked disputed territory, you attacked International border, we got what we wanted, to protect Lahore, you didnt get what you wanted, to drink tea in Lahore Cannt
Now that you scared us,we will for sure stay out of it.Its non of Trurks Matter so better stay out...................
We don't need Pakistan...................But we will not give away an inch of Kashmir..............Period
It's none of your business,do we meddle in your affairs?Now that you scared us,we will for sure stay out of it.
yes you wanted a war, you have always wanted wars, you also started shit on Runn Of Kutch, which also contributed to itHahaha... So India waged a war to have tea at Lahore.. Well I thought it was counter move from India to threaten Pakistan of his foolishness to attack our territory. It worked Pakistan did go back.. If we wanted Lahore we would have initiated the war before, don't we?
dude pls, our biggest of cities didnt get a scratch, the war only occurred in villages and districts, and we pushed you back, not the other way aroundLOL. Rewriting history? It was Pak that started the war, to get Kashmir. Not India that did it to take Lahore. You thought you could attack Kashmir and we would be on the defensive - we proved that if you attack any inch of our terrritory, not even your biggest cities will be safe. The message was loud and clear, and Pakistan went hurrying back without getting what they came for.
continue to cry pleaseI reserve the right to cry and tell the world how nasty people you are...
and secretly pay back in kind and blame you too for that...
we will seeYea well, that's what you have been saying for a long time. But today, your armed forces will not even try to take Kashmir by open war.
there is always a new strategyWhat more can you do, that you haven't done up till now?
From the article,It's none of your business,do we meddle in your affairs?
yes you wanted a war, you have always wanted wars, you also started shit on Runn Of Kutch, which also contributed to it
dude pls, our biggest of cities didnt get a scratch, the war only occurred in villages and districts, and we pushed you back, not the other way around
continue to cry please
we will see
there is always a new strategy
Since the Shimla agreement of 1972, it is a bilateral issue. BTW there is nothing Turkey can do, even if it wanted to - can you tell me something concrete Turkey can bring to the table that will end the issue?From the article,
''Turkey is ready to play its due role for a peaceful settlement of longstanding Kashmir issue and the solution should be acceptable to Pakistan, India and Kashmiri people – the real stakeholders''.
Offering help for a peaceful solution is meddling in your affairs?
there is always a new strategy
I already stated no third party can be allowed since shimla agreement prohibits it.From the article,
''Turkey is ready to play its due role for a peaceful settlement of longstanding Kashmir issue and the solution should be acceptable to Pakistan, India and Kashmiri people – the real stakeholders''.
Offering help for a peaceful solution is meddling in your affairs?