Turkey ready to play role in Kashmir settlement

[Kompromat]

Arundhati Roy. Similarly shall I point out articles by Hamid Mir about PA or ISI? India allows everybody to voice their opinion, without riddling them with bullets. Selectively cherrypicking one dissident writer gets you nowhere.

Who can help a man in denial?

India Booms: The Breathtaking Development and Influence of Modern India
By John Farndon

Economic Diplomacy: Economic and Political Perspectives
edited by Peter A.G. Bergeijk, Maaike Okano-Heijmans, Jan Melissen

 

[TheMatador]

Now two front war becomes three front war. Muslim brothers coming to back up Pakistan.

 

[janon]

Who can help a man in denial?

View attachment 90134

India Booms: The Breathtaking Development and Influence of Modern India
By John Farndon


View attachment 90133

Economic Diplomacy: Economic and Political Perspectives
edited by Peter A.G. Bergeijk, Maaike Okano-Heijmans, Jan Melissen

I know for a fact, and so would you if you open your eyes, that the army does not even operate against Kashmiris in Kashmir. Only the RR and other police forces do counter insurgency. Of course there is a large army presence there, because it is a state that our neighbours have tried to take from us, and still harbor delusions of taking from us. And the number BTW is far less than 700K.

BTW your link includes army, paramilitary and police forces, all collectively called "troops". Of this, the army and BSF do not do CI or other internal duties. Only the RR and police forces do. The total number of RR strength is around 65,000. They are our CI grid in Kashmir. The army is to deter Pakistan, and the BSF is to man the borders.

Our army is stationed there to counter external threats. Only the Kashmir police and rashtriya rifles and CRPF do counter insurgency. There are enough writings around countering these stupid claims of yours.

 

[SirHatesALot]

Why not,you have to start somewhere and others would follow or even take over(US,EU,China,Russia).

Turkey is hardly a neutral party,not to mention that shimla agreement prohibits any third to meddle in this issue,this strictly has to be dealt bilaterally between India and Pakistan.

 

[Supply&Demand]

Why not,you have to start somewhere and others would follow or even take over(US,EU,China,Russia).

Turkey is a pro-pakistan, pro-muslim nation..it cannot be trusted to play any role in this matter...especially ur leader who is a islamist...and anti-israel...so turkey can take a backseat...

 

[ares]

As per agreement signed by India and Pakistan in 1974.

No third party can mediate on Kashmir without explicit permission of both India and Pakistan.
And India will never permit involvement any other party on Kashmir.

 

[TheMatador]

India is getting gangbanged. First China spanks. Then Turkey slaps on face. Soon Iran will meddle in Kashmir. Indonesia too. Maybe Barak HUSSEIN Obama has something to say about Kashmir

 

[StormShadow]

India knows what allowing the people of J&K to exercise their birth right to self determination would lead to. The entire Indian nation suffers from genocidal hegemony and living in mass self inflicted denial that somehow it would be able to maintain its colonial rule of J&K against the will of the people forever. India itself was once occupied by a superpower, if that can end, the Indian occupation of J&K will end too.

What was pakistan doing at that time?

 

[Wounded-Monk]

yeah right. who cares

Keeping status quo is in our interest....

 

[Kompromat]

What was pakistan doing at that time?

We were plotting not to be occupied by a mythical kingdom which ought to be re-established.

 

[Jf Thunder]

Because we don't want to. We would move away from Pakistan, if that was physically possible. Nobody in their right minds would want an unstable, war torn country like Pak to be part of them. We have never tried to take over Pakistan - every war has been about defending ourselves, or cutting them into two.


Well we could make the same threat and demand your Sindh. What would be your response? Just because a neighbour threatens us with violence, doesn't mean we will give up our land and possessions - especially when we know we are stronger than them. You have tried violence in the past, and it has not worked. If you threaten violence again, we will have no choice but to respond in kind. But Kashmir rahega Hindustan.

defending by attacking Lahore and breaching International borders, and then being sent back resulting in a ceasefire, which gave both countries virtually nothing

 

[Infinity]

Why,dont you want a peaceful solution?
You rather have the current situation,with a possible war in the future?

Its non of Trurks Matter so better stay out...................

If they are so weak,why not take over the whole of Pakistan,since you obviously must be very strong?

We don't need Pakistan...................But we will not give away an inch of Kashmir..............Period

 

[Jf Thunder]

Well we could make the same threat and demand your Sindh. What would be your response? Just because a neighbour threatens us with violence, doesn't mean we will give up our land and possessions - especially when we know we are stronger than them. You have tried violence in the past, and it has not worked. If you threaten violence again, we will have no choice but to respond in kind. But Kashmir rahega Hindustan.

SIndh is not disputed.
we shall do what is required of us, but "Kashmir ban ke rahega Pakistan"

how about no. Peace is overrated...

then dont cry when people infiltrate in your India and blow up your parliament and hotels

 

[janon]

defending by attacking Lahore and breaching International borders, and then being sent back resulting in a ceasefire, which gave both countries virtually nothing

Tell the whole story. Pakistan attacked India to get Kashmir, and ended up desperately defending Lahore.

We did not start the war, and we did not try to take Pakistani territory. Attacking Lahore was because we knew than attack is the best form of defence. It was Pakistan that started the war with operation grandslam, which resulted in a grand mess. We defended our Kashmir, and we counter attacked to make Pak back off.

We got what we wanted - defending our territory. You dd not get what you wanted - Kashmir.

 

[ares]

SIndh is not disputed.
we shall do what is required of us, but "Kashmir ban ke rahega Pakistan"

What more can you do, that you haven't done up till now?