What's new

Trump reiterates offer to mediate Kashmir dispute; India insists it's a bilateral issue

. . .
If killing Muslims were to be a yardstick to boycott & declare , Pakistan would be the first be on the recieving end . More Muslims die at the hands of fellow Muslims (in non combat zones) in Pak than possibly any where else.
Is it your wish or backed by facts because if they are backed by facts than i would like you to present them....Yes?

GoP's criminal silence on escalations in Kashmir are not to be forgotten nor forgiven.
Criminal silence you say?

This must be Mulana Fazlu taking a stance on Kashmir.
And while you are on your usual rant, why forget that it was during PM Khan's visit that for the very first time any US President has ever come forward so boldly in his offer to meditate. Before that during the time of your beloved Nawaz and Zardari we all know what the US stance have been when it came to Kashmir and India.
 
. . . . . .
The sad reality is that Kashmir issue would have been resolved long time ago but not for the China factor. Having read various papers from 1960s it is apparent the West wanted to sort out Kashmir and regarded it as in their interests to do so. The Pak/India rivalry annoys weestern powers as they would prefer the successor states of the British Raj to fall under their strategic umbrella rather then fight between each other.

However the strong effort in 1960s to resolve the Kashmir issue by US and British officials became stuck because of Indian obduracy. That obduracy was borne out of Indian realization that the west would only push India so far because it needed it to stand against China. The Chinese threat had become real when the 1962 Sino-India war broke out and western powers rushed to help India. With the China card in their hands the Indians could play about until the mediation effort ran out of steam.


The "Chinese card" if there was any, the validity of it should have come out in open after the Doklam spanking India receive at the hands of Chinese. India would never challenge China even if it ever wanted to , simply due to the disparity between the two countries. China is a bogeyman India use to get goodies from West, to be used against Pakistan. If western strategist are playing along all this time, then perhaps they are either naïve or part of the problem or maybe they got Pakistan in their crosshair as well.
 
.
The world needs to boycott India and declare Modi a terrorist who is involved in killing of Muslims not only in Kashmir but in India as well. A fascist regime.
Cool. Let me know when that happens.
 
. .
Pakistan was ' helping' the US since the Soviet invasion of AF , did the US help then ?

No one helps anyone in the world of Intl politics - unless they have something to gain from it.

As far as the Indo Pak issue is concerned, the whole world stands to lose if an accord is reached between India & Pak.

I don't recall any Pakistani leader asked yanks back then to mediate over Kashmir issue as a give and take over our help in defeating soviets. Besides, back then India was firmly with USSR and didn't have much dependency on America. Now, try to piss off yanks and they will show you your place. India started its change in 90s all thanks to the American lead west. America now got all the leverages that are needed to arm twist India. Not implying that American will use them, but for Pakistan, its now essential to have this give and take with yanks over the issue of Afghansitan tied with the favourable resolution on Kashmir.
 
.
America now got all the leverages that are needed to arm twist India. Not implying that American will use them, but for Pakistan, its now essential to have this give and take with yanks over the issue of Afghansitan tied with the favourable resolution on Kashmir.

Pak can & must do what it feels is in its interest and so must India. It’s not in Indian interests to step outside the Shimla accord. No party in power has done so. Politicians have only one aim in life - to get re elected in the next election. BJP won’t last a day if it deviates , not that it wants to either and the nation is one on this.

This President has another year at best...

Wondering why so many Para Mil soldiers are moving to J&K ?

Delimitation ?
 
.
Pak can & must do what it feels is in its interest and so must India. It’s not in Indian interests to step outside the Shimla accord. No party in power has done so. Politicians have only one aim in life - to get re elected in the next election. BJP won’t last a day if it deviates , not that it wants to either and the nation is one on this.

This President has another year at best...

Wondering why so many Para Mil soldiers are moving to J&K ?

Delimitation ?


It was BJP which was dealing with Musharraf back then on Kashmir issue, so this self concocted ideas that Indian government will not last a day if it compromise on its stated public policy is just mere hogwash. Connect what Trump said about Modi request for mediation with IK saying BEFORE Indian elections that he is hoping for Modi win to see progress on Kashmir issue, it will become clear.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom