What's new

Trump reiterates offer to mediate Kashmir dispute; India insists it's a bilateral issue

The world needs to boycott India and declare Modi a terrorist who is involved in killing of Muslims not only in Kashmir but in India as well. A fascist regime.
If killing Muslims were to be a yardstick to boycott & declare , Pakistan would be the first be on the recieving end . More Muslims die at the hands of fellow Muslims (in non combat zones) in Pak than possibly any where else.
 
Last edited:
Trump is only doing this at Pakistan's request. Proof that Trump is really desperate to get out of Afghanistan. But he knows what the answer is and will always be. He won't push too hard, just the appearance of asking is enough.
 
Trump is only doing this at Pakistan's request. Proof that Trump is really desperate to get out of Afghanistan. But he knows what the answer is and will always be. He won't push too hard, just the appearance of asking is enough.

Modi asked him to initiate the peace talks.
 
Will you let India broker a peace deal between Iran and USA?

No, as long as that buffoon is in the white house, not only India, but no other country on earth can do such a thing.

In other circumstances, yes, I would be okay if, India, Pakistan, Japan, Oman, Iraq, and some other countries mediated between the two countries. No problem in that.
 
Iran is always or mostly on Indian side???

Natural allies.

They both share hegemonic vision of Indo Iranian empires and cooperate closely in Afghanistan.

No, as long as that buffoon is in the white house, not only India, but no other country on earth can do such a thing.

In other circumstances, yes, I would be okay if, India, Pakistan, Japan, Oman, Iraq, and some other countries mediated between the two countries. No problem in that.

Trump is a straight talker. You are better off striking a deal with him than someone who is likely to backstab for political gains.

It is easier to strike business deals with someone hell bent on trade wars than to strike strategic deals with seasoned politician.
 
Trump is a straight talker. You are better off striking a deal with him than someone who is likely to backstab for political gains.

It is easier to strike business deals with someone hell bent on trade wars than to strike strategic deals with seasoned politician.

A person who doesn't abide by previous multilateral agreements and is having daily tantrums on Twitter and in real life, is not to be trusted over his word even for a second.
 
both are working towards same goal?

both are chasing their long lost empires

A person who doesn't abide by previous multilateral agreements and is having daily tantrums on Twitter and in real life, is not to be trusted over his word even for a second.

He has honored every written deal to this point by the way. I would say since the situation is so bad let him have a go at it.
 
United States will never be able to contain China without Pakistan.

That is quite a tall claim. Geography will take a back seat to economics any day of the week. The tussle between USA and China will remain mainly economic. Pakistan is a mere bystander in all of that, tall claims notwithstanding.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom