What's new

Trump expected to decertify Iran nuclear deal soon

It's been denied by Iran foreign ministry spokesman.

They are known lairs .... probably they already talked about it with western...
I already predicated these days .... but I was mocked by other members in this forum and military.ir
 
.
They are known lairs .... probably they already talked about it with western...
I already predicated these days .... but I was mocked by other members in this forum and military.ir
The point is if even they want to talk they have no authority.
 
.
Iran rejects Reuters report, says missile program non-negotiable
Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesman Bahram Qassemi says the Islamic Republic’s missile program is for defensive purposes and is not open to any negotiations.

Qassemi on Friday firmly rejected a Reuters report quoting unnamed Iranian and Western officials as saying that Iran has signaled to the six world powers with which it signed the historic nuclear agreement in 2015 that it is open to talks about its ballistic missile arsenal.

“Iran regards defensive missile programs as its absolute right and will definitely continue them within the framework of its defensive, conventional and specified plans and strategies,” the Iranian spokesperson said.

He added that Iran “has repeatedly in diplomatic meetings with foreign officials” emphasized that its “defensive missile program is not negotiable” and that Tehran “does not regard it as inconsistent with [UN Security Council] Resolution 2231.”

In all his meetings and interviews with international media on the sidelines of last month’s 72nd session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif reiterated the non-negotiable nature of the Islamic Republic’s defensive missile program.

According to the Reuters report, the sources said that given US President Donald Trump's threats to ditch the nuclear agreement, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), reached under his predecessor Barack Obama, Tehran had approached the powers recently about possible talks on some “dimensions” of its missile program.

Iran and the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council – the United States, France, Britain, Russia and China – plus Germany signed the nuclear agreement on July 14, 2015 and started implementing it on January 16, 2016.

Under the JCPOA, Iran undertook to put limitations on its nuclear program in exchange for the removal of nuclear-related sanctions imposed against Tehran.

During his speech at the UN General Assembly on September 19, Trump described the JCPOA as “the worst and most one-sided transaction Washington has ever entered into,” a characterization he often used during his presidential campaign.

The US Republican president faces an October 15 deadline for certifying that Iran is complying with the deal. If Trump refuses to do that, then the Republican-controlled Congress will have 60 days to decide whether to reimpose sanctions waived under the deal. That would let Congress effectively decide whether to kill the deal.

During an interview published by the Associated Press on September 27, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said the US president "would open a Pandora's box" if he tried to renegotiate the terms of the JCPOA.

Zarif added that the possibility of renegotiating the deal was a “myth.”

The ambassadors from Britain, France, Germany and the European Union to the United States on September 25 expressed their countries’ strong support for the JCPOA.
The European ambassadors vowed to do everything possible to protect any companies based in Europe that continue to do business with Iran from reimposed US sanctions in case of Washington’s withdrawal from the JCPOA.
http://presstv.com/Detail/2017/10/06/537717/Iran-US-Bahram-Qassemi-Reuters-missile-program-JCPOA
 
.
First will US sanctions on Iran even affect the Iranian economy?
The EU supports the nuclear deal and the EU is a bigger economic partner for Iran than the US and also the nuclear deal allowed hundreds of billions worth deals to be signed with Iran. Is the EU willing to give them up because of a loon?
Iranian banks also have access to SWIFT now, can Trump block Iran from SWIFT again?


In short what Trump does is irrelevant if the rest of the world doesn't join up with him
 
.
They are known lairs .... probably they already talked about it with western...
I already predicated these days .... but I was mocked by other members in this forum and military.ir

We are still mocking you :D
 
.
They are known lairs .... probably they already talked about it with western...
I already predicated these days .... but I was mocked by other members in this forum and military.ir
they cant talk about it because those missiles are not defense ministry project and they don't have exact specification for them . only what announced in media.
 
.
They are known lairs .... probably they already talked about it with western...
I already predicated these days .... but I was mocked by other members in this forum and military.ir
offtopic but since you mentioned you write on military.ir, you guys recently had a thread there titled "Formation of Hizbullah - Pakistan chapter" .Please do update us on your progress in this regards for the low cultured people of Pakistan like how this man terms it
باید زودتر از اینها تشکیل میشد...به نظر من باید در کنار جنبه ی نظامی جنبه ی فرهنگی و تبلیغی رو هم در دستور کار قرار بدهند چون مردم پاکستان از نظر فرهنگی واقعا در سطح پایینی قرار دارند.مثل کاری که حزب الله تو لبنان داره میکنه.


Im also surprised why we dont find similar threads here on pdf..
@DESERT FIGHTER
 
.
We are still mocking you :D

well , back then you were using missiles pictures as your avatar pics but for past 3 years you are using either trolls or cars as your avatar ... this alone shows a lot ...

they cant talk about it because those missiles are not defense ministry project and they don't have exact specification for them . only what announced in media.

they can , they do ... the problem is bigger than this government , Islamic Republic is losing his identity ... for your knowledge , goverment doesn't paying supposed budget of Artesh and IRIGC to them ...

Artesh is struggling to pay its personal salary and in this situation there is no hope for modernization for Artesh ...
 
.
trump and his thicc white bois will handover global leadership to china. looking forward to live under commies. smh
 
. . .
"Any talks would not aim to end or suspend Iran’s missile programme but to “negotiate some dimensions of it, like limiting production of some missiles with specific ranges”, he said.

....

Another Western official said Iran must present concrete details for missile talks: “What will need to be seen are the specifics on load capability, the distance range of missiles and how many kilograms can a missile warhead carry"


So Iran is offering limiting production of certain missiles and US is asking for complete intelligence on each missile (in order to optimize missile defense systems).

So if Iran does this....then it is inviting the world to dismantle its detterence capability slowly but surely.


How exactly do you think you can regulate that? Is Iran going to allow inspection of it's missile bases?
NOT in a Million Years!

Is Iran going to give UN access to it's rocket scientists & Missile Production Facilities? I think NOT!

At max Iran will agree to NOT ever test ICBM's as long as it does not preclude Iran's Space Program! Anything beyond that will cause the government to loose support from it's main base & it's main supporters among the populist!

So far Iran's population has not seen any positive outcome from the Nuclear Deal so there is NO SUPPORT among the populist to agree to any restriction on it's BM program!

This is NOTHING BUT a DELUSION!

It's been denied by Iran foreign ministry spokesman.



Don't take it seriously,

Look at Iraq and look at Libya! These people must think Iranians are stupid!

Thank you but NO thank you!

I thinks it's best we go to war with our Ballistic Missile program intact!

I think Iranians will revolt if the government ever attempts to give up the Missile program!

They are known lairs .... probably they already talked about it with western...
I already predicated these days .... but I was mocked by other members in this forum and military.ir

Do you think Iranian leaders are stupid and blind?

Do you think they didn't witness what happened to both Saddam and Qaddafi after they gave up their missiles??

Iran agreed to the JCPOA because under the JCPOA Iran can restart it's civilian nuclear program after a decade!
Plus Iran never wanted a nuclear arsenal they wanted the capability to build them if need be & they have that!

U.S. problems with Iran is NOT about Iran's Ballistic missile program! And Iranian leaders aren't blind they know this! Giving up the missiles = loss of your deterrence = a war on Iran = downfall of this government!

Plus, the Ballistic Missile Program by the most part is under the control of the IRGC do you think IRGC commander will just site back and let this happen? They'll overthrow any government before they ever give up the missiles!
And Iranians would rather fight a war with their missiles program in tact than one without it!

Yes they will negotiate and yes they may agree NOT to test ICBM's but it's not going to go beyond that if it dose the government will fall!
 
. .
How exactly do you think you can regulate that? Is Iran going to allow inspection of it's missile bases?
NOT in a Million Years!

Is Iran going to give UN access to it's rocket scientists & Missile Production Facilities? I think NOT!

At max Iran will agree to NOT ever test ICBM's as long as it does not preclude Iran's Space Program! Anything beyond that will cause the government to loose support from it's main base & it's main supporters among the populist!

So far Iran's population has not seen any positive outcome from the Nuclear Deal so there is NO SUPPORT among the populist to agree to any restriction on it's BM program!

This is NOTHING BUT a DELUSION!



Look at Iraq and look at Libya! These people must think Iranians are stupid!

Thank you but NO thank you!

I thinks it's best we go to war with our Ballistic Missile program intact!

I think Iranians will revolt if the government ever attempts to give up the Missile program!



Do you think Iranian leaders are stupid and blind?

Do you think they didn't witness what happened to both Saddam and Qaddafi after they gave up their missiles??

Iran agreed to the JCPOA because under the JCPOA Iran can restart it's civilian nuclear program after a decade!
Plus Iran never wanted a nuclear arsenal they wanted the capability to build them if need be & they have that!

U.S. problems with Iran is NOT about Iran's Ballistic missile program! And Iranian leaders aren't blind they know this! Giving up the missiles = loss of your deterrence = a war on Iran = downfall of this government!

Plus, the Ballistic Missile Program by the most part is under the control of the IRGC do you think IRGC commander will just site back and let this happen? They'll overthrow any government before they ever give up the missiles!
And Iranians would rather fight a war with their missiles program in tact than one without it!

Yes they will negotiate and yes they may agree NOT to test ICBM's but it's not going to go beyond that if it dose the government will fall!

No matter how much Gov likes to go for smile policy Leader won't let this happen. American have tendency to publish their dreams list as news.

Yes, that is the nature of the Americans.
The point is our nature is different by Iraqis and Libyans and we've seen what happened to them.
 
.
No matter how much Gov likes to go for smile policy Leader won't let this happen. American have tendency to publish their dreams list as news.


The point is our nature is different by Iraqis and Libyans and we've seen what happened to them.

But even in a hypothetical situation! If any Iranian administration ever agrees to simply allow inspection of it's Missile Bases the IRGC will not site idly by & they will more likely dismantle that administration backed by the support of a vast majority of Iranians!

Simple inspection of your missile bases would destroy their deterrence factor!
Lets say you have 200 missiles stored at a Liquid Fuel missile base just agreeing to allow inspection of that base will compromise the coordinates of the fuel tanks you have stored there that means a few strikes with heavy ground penetrators targeted at those tankers could potentially render all your missiles at that base useless!

You would have to be insane to allow inspection of your missile bases that will without a doubt compromise every missile you have stored there!!!

The U.S. has gone out of it's way to prevent Iran from upgrading it's fighter fleet if you give up your missiles too than your just asking to get attacked!
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom