Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New Recruit
Where does our Tejas Mark 2 stand ?
Any idea ?
Crippled Airdefence, low level SAMs and no aerial opponents......I wonder how a target practice can be considered as operational experience.EFT and Rafale have seen battle..........in Libya.
Su-27 has also seen battle against Georgia.
all these lists are crap
A simple Question, do any of these have matched this performance?...Not considering costs, ranking of latest variants of aircraft that have flown in production configuration (I've only singled out variants with substantial changes to the airframe):
1) F-22 Raptor
2) Su-35
3) Mig-31
4) Dassault Rafale
5) Su-30MKI
6) Eurofighter Typhoon
7) F-18E
8) Mig-29M
9) F-16
10) Saab Gripen
Of course, once cost is factored in, the Sukhois win hands down.
A simple Question, do any of these have matched this performance?...
What in the world do those markings signify? American F-16s certainly haven't gotten that many air-to-air kills, so those markings must mean bombs dropped (likely on innocent Iraqis and Afghans).
That doesn't say anything about the F-16 performance, which has been left behind by modern aircraft.
Isn't it realistically very difficult to chart out a list like this while almost all the modern fighters have been/ are being built on open-architecture. so one plane can adopt several integrations in context of weapons and sensor suits. Now some of these sub systems also out perform others. for example a F-16 equipped with AESA can really make life hell difficult for many advanced fighters like Su-30 MKI or Rafale. I am not saying it will score a kill against MKI or Rafale but my point is about the underlying complexity in any such weapons where a lots of critical sub-systems plays decisive role in their actual performance.