Spring Onion
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2006
- Messages
- 41,403
- Reaction score
- 19
- Country
- Location
in other words hindus were aryan descendents
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
in other words hindus were aryan descendents
Since we are talking about vedic aryan, the Indians claim that they are all just one they are aryans and there is nothing different between dravidians and aryans (may be after centuries you guys want to narrow the divisions by stating so, its a good thing for local unity), however saying that it has anything to do with ONLY language and NOT race and religion and culture well its indeed a wrong claim.
Vedic Aryans were different people with different religion and practices, some of them migrated southward and lost their origional faith and culture , indeed they cursed those tribes of theirs who stayed back (Sapta Sindhu).
the rituals which are followed now by hindus in India as many of you have said were adopted over time hence it can be implied that these are changing things and should not be made basis for taking offense at ?
funny celeberating holi also does not make you hindu but following hindu gods does pollute the faith of non hindus simple logic.
the Rigveda clearly stated who were Aryans and what was their faith. the reality is they were NOT Hindus .
Hindus were dravidians. some of aryans (few from their tribe/s) went southward India and adopted dravidian faith. So you may have some desi aryans in your folds in India but the reality is India is majority dravidian
Aryans were also NOT part of dharma.
Above all awhile back you Indians were saying that hinduism is ever changing and their is NO strict rule of following dharma so why you have to have this rule for Christians or for that matter any other faith to become part of hinduism?
NO Indra was vedic Aryan god which later adopted by hindus and termed it another form of shiva which by the way was NOT again it implies that those vedic aryan tribe who migrated to south were consumbed by dravidian faith.
may be it has more to do with minimising the influence of migrators which by the way dravidians did.
"In Rig Veda, the gods of Dyaus is the same as the Greek Zeus (Roman Jupiter), Mitra is the same as the Graeco-Roman Mithras, Ushas is the same as the Greek Eos (Roman Aurora), and
Agni is the same as the Graeco-Roman Ignis. "
the Rigveda clearly stated who were Aryans and what was their faith. the reality is they were NOT Hindus .
Hindus were dravidians. some of aryans (few from their tribe/s) went southward India and adopted dravidian faith. So you may have some desi aryans in your folds in India but the reality is India is majority dravidian
Aryans were also NOT part of dharma.
Do you consider Muslims, Christians & Jews as part of Hinduism ?
the Rigveda clearly stated who were Aryans and what was their faith. the reality is they were NOT Hindus .
It has been proposed that the protoElamo-Dravidian language spread eastward from southwest Persia into South Asia with agriculture, and the argument is bolstered by the existence of a solitary Dravidian-speaking group, the Brahui, in Pakistan.
There is also a hypothesis that the Dravidian languages display similarities with the Uralic language group, suggesting a prolonged period of contact in the past.
Bunch of BS not worth any reply.You clearly don't understand the complex nature of Human migration and none of your blabbering has any scientific basis.It has more to do with your preconceived prejudices than any thing scinetific.
In Rg veda river Ganga does not even come close to the importance given to River Saraswati. Rgveda was written in a long period of time and in the earlier parts of it there is no mention of Ganga. I am not sure but in the earlier parts of Rg I did not find Kashi and Varanasi to be mentioned.May be in the later parts it is there.Let me brush up it once again.
@ExtraOdinary i already given my comment.... i think u missed my post here.... Aryan race is indian race. Germans are children of aryan indian race.... Hitler knew everything. Aryan is a Sanskrit word.... Hitler adore india and loved india. He stole swastika of india and made a symbol of nazi because he knew india is mother of majority of race.... Do u know majority of Nazi had bhagvadgita in pocket? They knew hindus are supreme race.... aryan is a sanskrit word that indian gods gave to india. Indian gods said majority of people in world are hindus by birth. Hindunism is not religion. Its a spiritual science.... i can tell u alot more. Just keep an eye on my facebook wall at Galacticfederation33@gmail.com i will add there info later.... Btw nazi copied india wrong way. They knew indians very first pure aryan race with powerful brain. They turned holy swastika into evil nazi swastika. i have 18 feet long swastika at my home.... Nazi aliens are pro indians and against americans.... but we ashtar galactic federation of light is neutral to nazi alien race.... i have seen few nazi alien humanoids near osho pyramid ashram.... Later in fb i will explain. Meanwhile read here bit info....
Nazi Germany
It is true that the Saraswati is more important in the Rig Veda, that is because the Puru clan were settled on its banks. And there are indeed references to ancestors from Kashi.
. My bad. Thnx for clarifying. Can you tell how beef became a taboo.
Aryan have never been part of India's national identity, unlike in Iran (Land of the Aryans) were people always referred to themselves as 'Aryans' (Iranians).