The world's most advanced and effective short range surface to air missile defense system HQ-17AE

[beijingwalker]

The world's most advanced and effective short range surface to air missile defense system HQ-17AE

 

[hyperman]

no, the crotale reverse engineered ripoff is not the most advanced short range air defense system. lol

 

[Imran Khan]

Whatever China has now a days is most advance though world consider it a crap.

we see its worked well

 

[KampfAlwin]

no, the crotale reverse engineered ripoff is not the most advanced short range air defense system. lol

Bruh, did you even watch the video? This does not even remotely resemble a crotale. lol

 

[Imran Khan]

Yes, ofcourse. We used agaist China in such a way that they could not disclose casualties figure. You are never wrong Khan saheb.

that was really hard day for you guys

 

[hyperman]

Bruh, did you even watch the video? This does not even remotely look like a crotale. lol
View attachment 772039

French Crotale

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1d/Crotale_missile_launchers_DSC00866.jpg

Chinese HQ-7

http://www.military-today.com/missiles/hq7.jpg

Its not really a secret. lol

 

[Surya 1]

that was really hard day for you guys

We made it even harder for China.

 

[Imran Khan]

We made it even harder for China.

 

[Surya 1]

View attachment 772041

That is why I consider you my best friend on PDF.

 

[KampfAlwin]

French Crotale

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1d/Crotale_missile_launchers_DSC00866.jpg

Chinese HQ-7

http://www.military-today.com/missiles/hq7.jpg

Its not really a secret. lol

Yes, there's no argument about that. But we're talking about a completely different system, HQ-17A, not HQ-7. As I said, the difference in appearance is obvious. This is what it means to be a PLA/military watcher.

 

[FuturePAF]

Chinese modernized exportable version of the Tor. Pakistan should field test it to see if it works against PGMs.

 

[beijingwalker]

Whatever China has now a days is most advance though world consider it a crap.

lOL, What India's version of it? Can Indians build anything at all...

 

[Surya 1]

lOL, What India's version of it? Can Indians build anything at all...

According to CPC re-education camp syllabus, No, Otherwise, yes.

 

[beijingwalker]

According to CPC re-education camp syllabus, No, Otherwise, yes.

Ok, what is India's version of it?

 

[hyperman]

Yes, there's no argument about that. But we're talking about a completely different system, HQ-17A, not HQ-7. As I said, the difference in appearance is obvious. This is what it means to be a PLA/military watcher.

whoops my bad, i looked at the thumbnail which had the hq-7 and didn't notice the title said hq-17 not hq-7. but if im not mistaken the hq-17 is a reverse engineered soviet tor sytem.