The Top 10 Armies You Don't Want to Fight.

[LeGenD]

so much fight my ***....the mujaheddin and NLI sneaked in like rats when our soldiers came down from their checkposts in winter and our casualties were because we have to take out the dug in nests....but thanks to that we are now alert and try repeating that now....

Wars are filled with surprises, junior. Check some WW-II based documentaries.

When your army came, those 5000 troops gave them tough challenge.

haha..oh yeah...1 pakistani = 10 indians..lmao...

Is your ego hurt?

cheap *** urdu media propaganda...

Now I understand that why Indians are so stupid and misled.

Please come out of your bollywood fantasy world.

Fairplay to Pakistani Nationalist to make Pakistan sound like a top 5 nations, or even top 10, when they are not.

Neither is UK. Thanks.

 

[harpoon]

This is coming from a western expert: "The quality of some of the Pakistani troops is probably better on average than that of the Indians"

Yes, the Martial Superiority Theory.

No, here is the front: PAF Chases away Indian Jets | Pakistan Daily

Are you guys sleeping? You don't know about the 2008 IAF raid over Pakistan?

Got any neutral source.

What was the year?

Pakistan maintains large military presence along the Indian border. I have seen large scale military movements with my own eyes on the Indian front during escalated tensions after the mumbai attacks.

This happened after Mumbai attacks..I think 2010.

 

[RedBeard]

Lets see:

1. War of independence

2.1967 6 day war

3.War of attrition

4. Yom Kippur War

5. 1982 Lebanon war

6.2006 Lebanon War

Thats more than 2 .

Okay.........

 

[LeGenD]

Yes, the Martial Superiority Theory.

That statement dented your ego, I know.

Got any neutral source.

Would it matter? You will again come up with BS statements like Martial Superiority Theory.

This happened after Mumbai attacks..I think 2010.

Provide the source.

 

[harpoon]

That statement dented your ego, I know. .

What ego..We don't believe that we are superhumans.

Would it matter? You will again come up with BS statements like Martial Superiority Theory.


Provide the source.

Its a Malayalam newspaper...so no link available.

 

[MilSpec]

Wars are filled with surprises, junior. Check some WW-II based documentaries.

When your army came, those 5000 troops gave them tough challenge.


Is your ego hurt?


Now I understand that why Indians are so stupid and misled.

Please come out of your bollywood fantasy world.


Neither is UK. Thanks.

I wonder why pakistani establishment claimed, it had nothing to do with kargil and the infiltrators were all mujhideen.. It's unfortunate that your own army disowns you when you lay down your life for them.....sad?


And of course when you bring up bravery songs of 5000, soldiers giving 30K indian soldiers a tough fight from strategically held high altitude bunkers... let me remind you the cowardice of nearly 65000 soldiers surrendering without a fight...shameful?

 

[LeGenD]

What ego..We don't believe that we are superhumans.

We don't either.

That statement is from a western analyst. And your response was Martial Superiority Theory. You need a break from this forum.

Its a Malayalam newspaper...so no link available.

Then don't present information that you cannot back up with any source.

 

[Tshering22]

This is coming from a western expert: "The quality of some of the Pakistani troops is probably better on average than that of the Indians"

On the same grounds that Yeager claimed Pakistan to have extreme lead, only to have been silenced by his own side during Cold War itself when his own aircraft was pulverized by Maruts on ground.

The same western experts claim a lot of stuff today about you as well. Ready to accept that? I don't think we need an outsider to judge our capabilities.

Are you guys sleeping? You don't know about the 2008 IAF raid over Pakistan?

If you are calling two unarmed, unescorted Jaguars with only recon pods attached to gather intel as an "air raid" I don't see what you'd call an actual strike as. .

Pakistan maintains large military presence along the Indian border. I have seen large scale military movements with my own eyes on the Indian front during escalated tensions after the mumbai attacks.

Troop movements were high because you were expecting an attack. It didn't happen because there are more than one ways of attacking an enemy. We just proved this point right.

I live in reality. Time for you to do the same.

Point applies for Pakistanis the most as they are facing the consequences of the skewed realities they've been living in their 60+ years of history. And it is only going to worsen if this skewed imagination is what you continue to portray as reality.

 

[LeGenD]

I wonder why pakistani establishment claimed, it had nothing to do with kargil and the infiltrators were all mujhideen.. It's unfortunate that your own army disowns you when you lay down your life for them.....sad?

And Indians don't do any propaganda?

And of course when you bring up bravery songs of 5000, soldiers giving 30K indian soldiers a tough fight from strategically held high altitude bunkers... let me remind you the cowardice of nearly 65000 soldiers surrendering without a fight...shameful?

East Pakistan was neglected and weak region of Pakistan. India took advantage of the civil war.

How about the failure of the Indian army to cross BRB canal near Lahore during 1965? A small Pakistani force stopped several Indian brigades in this region. Shameful?

Discuss what is relevant now.

 

[LeGenD]

On the same grounds that Yeager claimed Pakistan to have extreme lead, only to have been silenced by his own side during Cold War itself when his own aircraft was pulverized by Maruts on ground.

The statement that I posted here is from William Hopkinson. What does Yeager has to do with this?

The same western experts claim a lot of stuff today about you as well. Ready to accept that? I don't think we need an outsider to judge our capabilities.

Your fellow Indians prefer assessments of outsiders. Advice them not to.

If you are calling two unarmed, unescorted Jaguars with only recon pods attached to gather intel as an "air raid" I don't see what you'd call an actual strike as. .

Go through my previous posts and then come back and talk. I will not waste my time by repeating same information again and again.

Troop movements were high because you were expecting an attack. It didn't happen because there are more than one ways of attacking an enemy. We just proved this point right.

What point did you prove? The attempted air raids on December 13th 2008, which failed?

Point applies for Pakistanis the most as they are facing the consequences of the skewed realities they've been living in their 60+ years of history. And it is only going to worsen if this skewed imagination is what you continue to portray as reality.

You guys live in fantasy world too.

My point is simple: Pakistan is in much greater state of readiness now then it ever has been in the past. You guys cannot digest this simple statement?

 

[harpoon]

We don't either.

That statement is from a western analyst. And your response was Martial Superiority Theory. You need a break from this forum.

Western analysts say a lot about PA & ISI now a days. So you believe it also.

Then don't present information that you cannot back up with any source.

I know what I read but here is one English link.

Under pressure Pak to shift 6,000 troops from border with India to Afghan side. - Free Online Library

 

[harpoon]

East Pakistan was neglected and weak region of Pakistan. India took advantage of the civil war.

You realize that war was also fought on our Eastern border

How about the failure of the Indian army to cross BRB canal near Lahore during 1965? A small Pakistani force stopped several Indian brigades in this region. Shameful?

Our main aim was to relieve the pressure of our troops in Kashmir and we succeeded in that by opening an another front.

 

[LeGenD]

Western analysts say a lot about PA & ISI now a days. So you believe it also.

Then why demand nuetral sources?

I know what I read but here is one English link.

Under pressure Pak to shift 6,000 troops from border with India to Afghan side. - Free Online Library

Thanks.

This was the time when tensions with India were high (after Mumbai attacks). The attention of Pakistan military was diverted towards the Indian front. I already mentioned that I witnessed massive military deployment on the Indian front during this time.

 

[below_freezing]

If you think that Vietnam lost coz they had such high killing ratio then it's time for China to re-consider your so called victory in Korea war against US.You had lost millions of soldiers in human wave strategy.

1. we lost 180,000 (our records) - 400,000 (US records). US's records are very questionable because they could never count any bodies - China never retreated, while China was always advancing so counted every US and Korean body.

2. We turned 1 million Korean civilians into fertilizer on their own land.

3. No one touched our land.

 

[harpoon]

Then why demand nuetral sources?

Western doesn't mean Neutral

This was the time when tensions with India were high (after Mumbai attacks). The attention of Pakistan military was diverted towards the Indian front. I already mentioned that I witnessed massive military deployment on the Indian front during this time.

Check the date: its 30th April 2009.