The Story Of Indian Army’s Nathu La & Cho La Stands That Saved Sikkim From The Chinese Army!

[grey boy 2]

Hopefully some "HONEST" old Indian members on this forum will have the courage to support the "TRUTH"
Unfortunately, perhaps its human nature likely to accept "FEELS GOOD FABRICATED STORY"

 

[Akasa]

View attachment 316306
Naib Subedar Gyan Bahadur Limbu (When a Gorkha taught them a lesson)

He was the Culprit of chopping both arms of Chinese with a Khukri.,

His Battalion Symbol is same Khukri
View attachment 316307

Because an Indian soldier with a knack of dismembering enemy soldiers is the best example of a neutral source.

 

[Jamwal's]

Because an Indian soldier with a knack of dismembering enemy soldiers is the best example of a neutral source.

Gurkha's khukhri is known for dismemberment and mutilation. Its part of their training.

If you read their military history, you will find several such incidents.

There are even pics available of their victims the latest being Beheaded Taliban commander.

 

[LOGICAL BOSSS]

Because an Indian soldier with a knack of dismembering enemy soldiers is the best example of a neutral source.

I just posted the pic of the man, because of whome the whole incident had happend. But again Chinese started it by hitting him

 

[Akasa]

Gurkha's khukhri is known for dismemberment and mutilation. Its part of their training.

If you read their military history, you will find several such incidents.

There are even pics available of their victims the latest being Beheaded Taliban commander.

And in what manner does this relate to my original inquiry?

 

[grey boy 2]

And somehow WordPress has more credibility than a neutral Wikipedia ?

No wonder China has a proper propaganda dept with a propaganda minister and Staff.

Yeah looks like your own country man from an Indian defense forum post fabricated news to defame Indians too?

Result : PLA invasion repelled by Indian military. Bilateral ceasefire.

Losses :
India : 4 killed
China : 12 killed, 9 wounded
http://indiandefence.com/threads/1967-sino-india-conflict-chola-incident.11916/

 

[Jamwal's]

Yeah looks like your own country man from an Indian defense forum post fabricated news to defame Indians too?

Result : PLA invasion repelled by Indian military. Bilateral ceasefire.

Losses :
India : 4 killed
China : 12 killed, 9 wounded
http://indiandefence.com/threads/1967-sino-india-conflict-chola-incident.11916/

Good, so now you come up with a random post by some Manmohan Yadav who got 5 likes for this.

Why not provide us Chinese sources, any account of PLA casualties between 1960 - 1970 ?

CPC must've had provided gallantry medals to the troops in 1962 war 1967 skirmish.

 

[Nilgiri]

http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/30868/6/06_chapter 2.pdf

The winter of 1967 witnessed skirmishes on India-China border. On 11 September, Chinese troops attacked Indian troops on the Sikkim border across the Nathula and opened heavy mortar and artillery fire. After repeated Indian protests and proposal for ceasefire, by 15 September there was a virtual cessation of all hostile activity. The Chinese again· fired heavily on the Indian positions at Chola, on 1 October and both sides suffered casualties. On 10 October, Chola again witnessed exchange of heavy fires between Indian and Chinese troops. The Indian Defence Minister informed the Parliament that Indian losses in the two border incidents were 88 killed and 163 wounded, while the Chinese casualties· were estimated to be 300 killed and 450 wounded in Nathula firing, and 40 in Chola. The minister assured that the government was keeping a close watch on developments across the borders having a bearing on India's security, and those were accordingly taken note of in the defence plans. [38]

38 - Lok Sabha Debates, vol. 9, 1967, Cols. 65-66.

Thats the Indian lower house (Lok Sabha) as the source

So no more whining about how Indian members here are changing the number from 4 to 400 or whatever. At most you can say the number has been changed around the 300 to 340 to 400 range since they are estimates to begin with....and its certainly not something done by Indian laypeople like here in this forum.

CPC must've had provided gallantry medals to the troops in 1962 war 1967 skirmish.

I heard somewhere that parts of the Chinese military was purged quite brutally during the Cultural revolution...so the records are going to be streaky at best.

 

[grey boy 2]

Good, so now you come up with a random post by some Manmohan Yadav who got 5 likes for this.

Why not provide us Chinese sources, any account of PLA casualties between 1960 - 1970 ?

CPC must've had provided gallantry medals to the troops in 1962 war 1967 skirmish.

Since you're the one who discredited "world express" or your own country man bravery post,
Its on "YOU" to prove me wrong with "CREDITABLE" source
Otherwise it will be nothing but some bad breath coming out from a Indian liar period

 

[Nilgiri]

"YOU" to prove me wrong with "CREDITABLE" source

Indian parliament creditable enough for you?

 

[grey boy 2]

NO, cos they shameless hide the "Henderson Report" from the world till now with a laughable excuse of "confidential" till today
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/...nda-government-jawaharlal-nehru/1/370410.html

 

[Nilgiri]

NO, cos they shameless hide the "Henderson Report" from the world till now with a laughable excuse of "confidential" till today

Well dig through the Chinese military archives then if you want...if any of it survived the Cultural Revolution (if the embarrassment of 1967 was put to paper in the first place).

We aren't here to convince a troll like you about our version.

 

[Jamwal's]

country man bravery post,

My country man bravery post on some random page means nothing compared with Indian Parliament account, which is given by @Nilgiri

You are free to believe whatever you want, be it a WordPress made by a Fanboy like yourself.

_________

Oh and one more thing, how about the biggest proof - Cho LA, Nathu LA, and Sikkim as a part of India.

Good enough ?

 

[grey boy 2]

Well dig through the Chinese military archives then if you want...if any of it survived the Cultural Revolution (if the embarrassment of 1967 was put to paper in the first place).

We aren't here to convince a troll like you about our version.

Personal insults to me or China only proved you lost your own argument

 

[Joe Shearer]

There were journalists covering the Vietnam and Korean wars, both of which played out in far more hostile and inhospitable environments than that of India/China, and who have encountered far worse efforts at censorship.

There are reasons why there are seldom reporters during these clashes.

1. It is a very quiet and peaceful part of the frontier (most are quiet and peaceful, except for the Aksai Chin front);
2. Civilians not of that state require an Inner Line Permit to move beyond a certain distance from the frontier;
3. The incidents lasted a day, sometimes two, I believe in one case, three. Not long enough for reporters to arrange to reach there.