DarkPrince
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2011
- Messages
- 2,281
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
mama i'm jus having some funDon't troll bhagne. One thousand years ago nobody cared about India and Bangladesh.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
mama i'm jus having some funDon't troll bhagne. One thousand years ago nobody cared about India and Bangladesh.
Kamboja
"Kamboja" or "Kambuja" is the name of an ancient Indo-Iranian kingdom. They are believed to have been located originally in Pamirs and Badakshan in Central Asia.
The name has a long history of attestation, both in the Iranian and the Indo-Aryan spheres.
@Rajaraja Chola some of the sanskrit names are still used in ASEAN countries because of influence of Indian culture.
Nope you are wrong Kamboja was in NW India, has nothing to do with Combodia.@Truth Finder in the maps Kamboja is shown as north west to india, ie current Pakistan. But Kamboja is the name for modern Combodia.
Gopala was not born in 750 ad. The data is wrong.
Nope you are wrong Kamboja was in NW India, has nothing to do with Combodia.
Cambodia's ancient name is "Kambuja" (Sanskrit: कंबुज).[9] In 802 AD, Jayavarman II declared himself king marking the beginning of the Khmer Empire which flourished for over 600 years allowing successive kings to dominate much of Southeast Asia and accumulate immense power and wealth. The Indianized kingdom built monumental temples such as Angkor Wat and facilitated the spread of first Hinduism, then Buddhism to much of Southeast Asia. After the fall of Angkor to Ayutthaya in the 15th century, Cambodia was ruled as a vassal between its neighbors until it became a protectorate by the French in the mid-19th century. Cambodia gained independence in 1953.
Cambodia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
@Truth Finder in the maps Kamboja is shown as north west to india, ie current Pakistan. But Kamboja is the name for modern Combodia.
What I meant was that Cambodia is not a successor state of ancient Kamboja of NW India. Kambojas were Indo-Iranians, Cambodians are not. Furthermore, the two are geographically far away. They are just namesakes.Nope. Check it out. Combodia's older name is also Kampoja or Kampojaas or Kampuja.
some how its only indians who know about these imaginary emprires .. lol
some how its only indians who know about these imaginary emprires .. lol
gopala was Bangladeshi not indian
What I meant was that Cambodia is not a successor state of ancient Kamboja of NW India. Kambojas were Indo-Iranians, Cambodians are not. Furthermore, the two are geographically far away. They are just namesakes.
some how its only indians who know about these imaginary emprires .. lol
Because they are useless and unimportant
its only the revisionist hindu history that gives these crack pot entities any importance even if they had hardly any influence over a particular area they colour it blue or something to show it was occupied by them
No one knows anything about them because they were nothing its like junglee empire in the middle of Africa
they just enjoy comparing this revisionist empires with the Romans ottomans or mughals
Idiot.some how its only indians who know about these imaginary emprires .. lol