The countries that are in range of Iranian ballistic missiles

[OldTwilight]

If Iran's Oil industry continues being sanctioned then there is absolutely no reason not to go full force towards nuke production.

And the only way not going nuclear makes sense at this point is if Iran has plans to mass produce Missiles far beyond our current production rate to compensate and starts producing the Khorramshahr Missiles equipped with highly accurate MIRV at a rates as high as 1000 a year + Emad, Sejil-2, Fatteh-110, Fatteh-313, Zolfaghar, Dezful, Qiam, Saegheh UCAV & Simorgh UCAV all at a rate of 1000 per year with yearly exercises where we test 5-10 of each on mocked targets to make a point.

In terms of missiles we may not need anything beyond 3000km due to our targeting capabilities but we do need wide diameter boosters capable of carrying a large number of payloads within that range that would be considered as ICBM's anyways and most importantly need wide diameter boosters for our SLV's because today countries can go to SpaceX pay them $100 Million to deliver a multi ton com sat in GEO orbit and if we are not allowed to do that then why the hell should we not produce missiles and boosters they consider to be ICBM's!
va aghar jangh vaghttter then besmellah

Do you know that making nuke is much easier and economical than making thousands of missiles ...

Years ago we had serious storage problem for our missiles ....

 

[WinterNights]

Do you know that making nuke is much easier and economical than making thousands of missiles ...

Years ago we had serious storage problem for our missiles ....

And unlike nukes Iran can actually use non-nuke tipped missile with much more freedom and no fear of initiating a MAD doctrine.

I don't understand why some people are so obsessed with Iran overtly being a nuclear power. It probably already has nukes. The only value of nukes is to provide deterrence, but they will come at a great military (also economical, political) cost meaning Iran's non-nuclear posture will be severely limited e.g using normal missiles. And Iran does not need them at the moment for deterrence because no one has the balls to attack Iran.

 

[CHACHA"G"]

No. Israel controls the US, attacking Israel will affect US policy and decision making.

As for the EU coming into a war for Isarel? You've got me lost there. Why?

You assumed Israel control USA , but you are refusing to assume same isreal control EU...………. Attacking Israel means attacking EU ……… Iran knows that too …

 

[jamal18]

You assumed Israel control USA , but you are refusing to assume same isreal control EU...………. Attacking Israel means attacking EU ……… Iran knows that too …

We can disagree on that one. I don't think that the same level of control exists over the EU.

 

[AHMED85]

I can say Iran have great potential in little missile technology.

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=492585121575815

But In war there are thousands of reason justify the prediction of Success.

Missile technology is good, but Israel have power potential in chemical weapons. UAV technology, laser Iron Beam, anti missile & much more. This make a good shield over Israel. And USA make Israel more powerful.

With these ground realities war is not good for the health of Iran because Iran is not an atomic country.
A simple missile cover normal destruction but chemical weapons create massive destruction.

 

[CHACHA"G"]

We can disagree on that one. I don't think that the same level of control exists over the EU.

Only time will tell..