What's new

‘Thank God this didn’t start in India’: Jim O’Neill praises China’s coronavirus response

powastick

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
2,398
Reaction score
1
Country
Malaysia
Location
Malaysia
‘Thank God this didn’t start in India’: Jim O’Neill praises China’s coronavirus response
PUBLISHED WED, MAR 11 20208:38 AM EDT
Elliot Smith@ELLIOTSMITHCNBC

KEY POINTS
  • Speaking to CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe” on Wednesday, former Goldman Sachs chief economist Jim O’Neill said the virus had “brought out the best and worst of the Chinese model.”
Jim O’Neill, the chair of U.K. think tank Chatham House, on Wednesday commended the “fast, aggressive” Chinese response to the coronavirus outbreak, suggesting western countries should follow suit.

Speaking to CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe” on Wednesday, the former Goldman Sachs chief economist said the virus had “brought out the best and worst of the Chinese model.”

On one hand, O’Neill said the dominance of President Xi Jinping and the diminished responsibility of officials in Wuhan, where the virus originated, may have enabled COVID-19 to initially spread quicker.

“That said — and it’s often like a lot of other things when China got hit with a crisis over the last 30 years — once they realized the scale of it, the system seems to be capable of dealing with it pretty quickly, relative to other places, and pretty decisively,” he added.

Chinese authorities shut down vast swathes of the country’s travel infrastructure and industrial production last month, causing a profound short-term shock to the Chinese and global economy. However, new cases of the virus in greater China have now slowed to a trickle, while Italy deals with a rapid escalation in new infections and a spiking death toll.

“Thank God this didn’t start in somewhere like India, because there’s absolutely no way that the quality of Indian governance could move to react in the way that the Chinese have done, that’s the good side of the Chinese model, and I think you could probably say the same about Brazil too.”

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi convened a government meeting at the weekend and directed officials to identify suitable locations for quarantine facilities and make provisions for critical care. The number of cases in the country has now reached 50, according to the latest WHO figures.

The Indian government has also launched awareness campaigns and imposed a range of travel and visa restrictions in a bid to contain the virus. The Indian consulate in London did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

The former commercial secretary to the U.K. Treasury suggested that western governments dealing with outbreaks of their own, such as Italy and the U.K., should look to emulate China, South Korea and Singapore in the swift deployment of aggressive containment measures.

He also argued that finance and economic policymakers must begin treating health policy more seriously and think of it in the same way as other investment spending, and criticized the protectionist agenda of the U.S. and other nations on international trade.

“Unless we get rid of all forms of communication, we are globalized people and we need to think and learn from each other about the right solutions at any moment in time for all of us,” O’Neill concluded.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/11/tha...eill-praises-chinas-coronavirus-response.html
 
‘Thank God this didn’t start in India’: Jim O’Neill praises China’s coronavirus response
PUBLISHED WED, MAR 11 20208:38 AM EDT
Elliot Smith@ELLIOTSMITHCNBC

KEY POINTS
  • Speaking to CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe” on Wednesday, former Goldman Sachs chief economist Jim O’Neill said the virus had “brought out the best and worst of the Chinese model.”
Jim O’Neill, the chair of U.K. think tank Chatham House, on Wednesday commended the “fast, aggressive” Chinese response to the coronavirus outbreak, suggesting western countries should follow suit.

Speaking to CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe” on Wednesday, the former Goldman Sachs chief economist said the virus had “brought out the best and worst of the Chinese model.”

On one hand, O’Neill said the dominance of President Xi Jinping and the diminished responsibility of officials in Wuhan, where the virus originated, may have enabled COVID-19 to initially spread quicker.

“That said — and it’s often like a lot of other things when China got hit with a crisis over the last 30 years — once they realized the scale of it, the system seems to be capable of dealing with it pretty quickly, relative to other places, and pretty decisively,” he added.

Chinese authorities shut down vast swathes of the country’s travel infrastructure and industrial production last month, causing a profound short-term shock to the Chinese and global economy. However, new cases of the virus in greater China have now slowed to a trickle, while Italy deals with a rapid escalation in new infections and a spiking death toll.

“Thank God this didn’t start in somewhere like India, because there’s absolutely no way that the quality of Indian governance could move to react in the way that the Chinese have done, that’s the good side of the Chinese model, and I think you could probably say the same about Brazil too.”

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi convened a government meeting at the weekend and directed officials to identify suitable locations for quarantine facilities and make provisions for critical care. The number of cases in the country has now reached 50, according to the latest WHO figures.

The Indian government has also launched awareness campaigns and imposed a range of travel and visa restrictions in a bid to contain the virus. The Indian consulate in London did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

The former commercial secretary to the U.K. Treasury suggested that western governments dealing with outbreaks of their own, such as Italy and the U.K., should look to emulate China, South Korea and Singapore in the swift deployment of aggressive containment measures.

He also argued that finance and economic policymakers must begin treating health policy more seriously and think of it in the same way as other investment spending, and criticized the protectionist agenda of the U.S. and other nations on international trade.

“Unless we get rid of all forms of communication, we are globalized people and we need to think and learn from each other about the right solutions at any moment in time for all of us,” O’Neill concluded.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/11/tha...eill-praises-chinas-coronavirus-response.html

I like this Jim oneil guy, one who started the BRIC acronym.Sorry Jim but there was never a chance because we normal indians don't eat bats or other exotic animals. Lol.
 
Last edited:
True, our bureaucracy isnt that powerful and swift to implement such huge decisions in a short period of time, which is excellent for policy making and infrastructure and energy sectors. Bad when it comes to defence and health related issues. But the shocking thing must be how ill-equipped the developed countries of Europe are.
 
True, our bureaucracy isnt that powerful and swift to implement such huge decisions in a short period of time, which is excellent for policy making and infrastructure and energy sectors. Bad when it comes to defence and health related issues. But the shocking thing must be how ill-equipped the developed countries of Europe are.

I am sure India has world class infrastructure
 
Well he's right. China does have more money and better infrastructure to deal with something like this. They also have a super authoritarian government that can get stuff done quickly, there's a reason why protests and rioting aren't a thing in China.

Not taking a dig at them here. There actually are a lot of good things about having a very strong central authority that can jump to action and do what they need to do without 'political considerations' and other hindrances.
 
BS-4 labs
There is just the one I think.

Hope the scientists can put it to good use and come up with a vaccine or cure/preventive cure.

Once there is an outbreak, though, these labs are useless as far as containing it, and a cure on average takes about 2 years (if they can find one).

Scary shit, I was just watching some documentaries about BSL 4 labs, those are some super high tech facilities.
 
There is just the one I think.

Hope the scientists can put it to good use and come up with a vaccine or cure/preventive cure.

Once there is an outbreak, though, these labs are useless as far as containing it, and a cure on average takes about 2 years (if they can find one).

Scary shit, I was just watching some documentaries about BSL 4 labs, those are some super high tech facilities.
National Institute of Virology, Pune
High Security Animal Disease Laboratory, Bhopal
Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad
 
There is just the one I think.

Hope the scientists can put it to good use and come up with a vaccine or cure/preventive cure.


BSL-3 facilities. BSL-3 facilities exist at Aga Khan University and Indus Hospital Karachi, Pakistan...

How are you guys doing with Poliovirus ?

Completely eradicated yet ?

Not as yet, some cases coming at the border areas with Afghanistan.
 
Back
Top Bottom