LOLOLOLOL. Wut?
Here's the official article from where FE and other news media source their news.
http://ptinews.com/news/10176084_IAF-officers-assist-SC-on-Rafale-deal-case.html
NO MENTION OF TEJAS.
Yaar, achaa comedy kartey ho.
Really? We didn't induct any aircrafts since 85?
What in all hell was PAF so afraid of in 99 then?
Clearly we didn't have the MiG 29s. Right?
Segmented dialogues from hours long court proceedings prove nothing.
We don't know if the court was asking a question or if another statement followed or if IAF said something post it.
From the article:
Why would IAF say they inducted Su-30MKIs and then right after, agree that there has been no induction since 85?
![Er... what? o_O o_O]()
Use common sense janaab.
The bench, also comprising Justices S K Kaul and K M Joseph, asked the officials about latest induction in the Air Force.
They told the bench that Sukhoi 30s is the latest to be inducted which is a 3.5 generation aircraft and added that they do not have 4th or 5th generation aircraft.
The top court then said that "it means there has been no induction of aircrafts since 1985".
The court in all probability is referring to the 4th gen fighters not being inducted since 85 and not the batch of MiG-29s, Su-30MKI or the Tejas which supposedly the IAF doesn't consider +4 Gen and which are indeed inducted into the IAF.
EItherway, there is nothing about Tejas not being inducted in the original article.
India ki har galli toh nahi patta, lekin pakistan ke galle ki nalli par khada tha hamara aircraft carrier.
Or have you forgotten how INS Vikrant aided in the blockade of Pakistan.
Funny how pakistanis seem to enjoy the schadenfreude whenever news like this appears but conveniently forget that you lot neither have ever operated nor have an aircraft carrier, nor the indigenous capacity and the monetary heft to even make a carrier based aircraft.
Maybe get an AC and build a plane from scratch first then talk about how your "experience" somehow supersedes facts.