Gen Padmanabhan
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2015
- Messages
- 553
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
From where you got this data?Out of those 773, 700 were copied/cheated from foreign nations.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
From where you got this data?Out of those 773, 700 were copied/cheated from foreign nations.
Is Tejas allowed to participate without FOC? Why not take LCH heli instead of Dhruva??
Out of those 773, 700 were copied/cheated from foreign nations.
IF they can allow JF17 aka Mig21 copy with israeli tech then why not Tejas!
Ecuador fiasco was bcoz of parts problems.
Dhruv new versions are very reliable. Tejas will make cheeni aircraft sweat in Bahrain!
Look at DRDO awacs.. Something Pak cant make in 2-3 decades!
Yes yes, one of them is the water car, or car running on water. U are right.
Out of those 773, 700 were copied/cheated from foreign nations.
And pray tell us an aircraft who has performed exceptionally well
This show it in Bahrain this product not backed by OEM, as in JF-17 case they claim OEM is PAC Kamara.It shows the problem with Indian air force. They dont involve in product development. They dont want to own the project while PAF inducted a junk fighter 5 yrs ago which couldnt fire a BVR missile
Tejas FOC criteria is = JF17 Block II- Electronic warfare + HMDS+ Better TWR
Exceptionally well? How & in which term, and in comparison to whom?And pray tell us an aircraft who has performed exceptionally well in turkey, china and france will sweat infront of Tejas ? Either you lost your marbles or you were high
EFT is on static displayhm i think i should go and see this airshow can't wait to see muh fav fighter EFT in the sky and best of luck to our Jf 17 may you get more buyers
Either provide proof or get the hell of from this thread.
I would like your parameters for exceptional performance ?
This show it in Bahrain this product not backed by OEM, as in JF-17 case they claim OEM is PAC Kamara.
Exceptionally well? How & in which term, and in comparison to whom?
EW, Weapon Package, Flight Envelope? If simply flying is exceptionally well in your case, then its good.
I watched all video, if that means "exceptionally well" for demonstration purpose flying with 20 min fuel, then it done pretty well.And this is where it gets interesting. Likes of you, sharma and many others, who dont bother to watch JF performance videos and keep aprised with latest updates asks such an ignorant illetrate question that one can only think of facepalming.
Instead of asking me, why dont you watch go pro videos of JF-17 as well as video recorded from 3 different ground cameras >
And this is where it gets interesting. Likes of you, sharma and many others, who dont bother to watch JF performance videos and keep aprised with latest updates asks such an ignorant illetrate question that one can only think of facepalming. Instead of asking me, why dont you watch go pro videos of JF-17 as well as video recorded from 3 different ground cameras >
It shows the problem with Indian air force. They dont involve in product development. They dont want to own the project while PAF inducted a junk fighter 5 yrs ago which couldnt fire a BVR missile
Tejas FOC criteria is = JF17 Block II- Electronic warfare + HMDS+ Better TWR
That's what I am asking -the parameters for exceptional performance ?
I hope you know what the term exceptional means ?
I watched all video, if that means "exceptionally well" for demonstration purpose flying with 20 min fuel, then it done pretty well.
Here you praising Go Pro or JF-17?