Syrian Civil War (Graphic Photos/Vid Not Allowed)

[beast89]

al jazeera interview

 

[BLACKEAGLE]

 

[Yazp]

Hey guys, look who I found

 

[Ahmed Jo]

Hey guys, look who I found
View attachment 236197 View attachment 236191

Interesting but he isn't really saying anything different than what he says here.

 

[500]

Why do you think the CC don't use their full power against Daesh?

Power they use pretty huge: two times more bombs than vs. Libya.

 

[Yazp]

Interesting but he isn't really saying anything different than what he says here.

*Used to say.

 

[Serpentine]

In Zabadani, the natural alliance is happenning: Nusra, FSA, Ahrar al-Sham and ISIS are all united in one small city, fighting SAA/Hezbollah.

This is the true reality of Syrian 'revolution'. They are all the same.

IS terrorists in Zabadani.

 

[500]

In Zabadani, the natural alliance is happenning: Nusra, FSA, Ahrar al-Sham and ISIS are all united in one small city, fighting SAA/Hezbollah.

This is the true reality of Syrian 'revolution'. They are all the same.

IS terrorists in Zabadani.

Lebanese terrorists invade Syrian town. Yet defenders are bad and attackers - good?

 

[Serpentine]

Lebanese terrorists invade Syrian town. Yet defenders are bad and attackers - good?

Israeli terrorists attacked Lebanon, Hezbollah was bad and Israel was good?

 

[500]

Israeli terrorists attacked Lebanon, Hezbollah was bad and Israel was good?

Two mistakes in ur post: IDF is a legal army and its Hezbollah who attacked Israel.

 

[Madali]

Two mistakes in ur post: IDF is a legal army and its Hezbollah who attacked Israel.

Absolutely nothing about Israel is legal.

 

[Serpentine]

Two mistakes in ur post: IDF is a legal army and its Hezbollah who attacked Israel.

Definition of terrorism: One who deliberately targets civilians for political/religious purposes. So yes, IDF can be named as terrorists. Secondly, IDF is not a 'legal' army exactly. And last but not least, Israel did attack Lebanon in 1982, which led to a series of chain events. I know I shouldn't compare Hezbollah with IDF, it would be an insult to the former.

 

[500]

Definition of terrorism: One who deliberately targets civilians for political/religious purposes. So yes, IDF can be named as terrorists.

IDF does not attack cities indiscriminately like Hezbollah.

Secondly, IDF is not a 'legal' army exactly.

Israel is a legal UN member state and IDF its legal armed forces. Hezbollah on the other hand is illegal militia which must be disarmed according to UN Sec Con resolution 1701.

And last but not least, Israel did attack Lebanon in 1982, which led to a series of chain events.

Chain of events started in 1948 when Lebanon attacked Israel and refused to make peace afterwards. Then in 1970, when Lebanon allowed PLO to use its territory for attacks against Israel. Then Lebanon did same with Hezbollah.

 

[Hack-Hook]

IDF does not attack cities indiscriminately like Hezbollah.

Please don't make me Start talking on IDF not attacking cities indiscriminately

 

[Ceylal]

May God reserves his best lodge in hell to him..