What's new

Strike package revealed.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Serving PAF officer...thats it....Check my post 27 or 28th very first day I said my freind told me along with Mig-21 they have shoot down big fat boggy but didn't reveal what type of big boggy...now we all know it was SU-30.
ok
 
They can lie and deny all they want, painfull as it is for them the truth will come from their own mouths. Apart from the F-16 shot down bull crap tagged on the end some interesting admissions. How stupid can they get - on the one hand they are saying the hit 5 out of 6 targets and on the other admitting the strike was a failure!!? On the one hand they claim to have shot down an F16 and on the other cry about how they were not able to match PAF's tech!!? This is what happens when you lie, inbetween your lies are bits of truth, so the end story just doesn't hang together, unless you're a Modi lover in which case you will believe anything he says...…………

We Could Have Inflicted Heavy Damage On Pakistan During Aerial Raid If We Had 'tech Asymmetry': IAF
Written By Press Trust Of India | Mumbai | Published: April 25, 2019 18:12 IST
Hack:
  • As per an IAF report, if the Indian Air Force possessed high levels of 'technological asymmetry' then it would have been able to inflict heavy damage on Pakistan
  • The IAF had carried out an aerial raid on Pakistan on February 27, however, it was an unsuccessful one
  • The report analysed various aspects of IAF's air strike on a Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) terrorist training camp in Pakistan's Balakot on February 26

If the Indian Air Force possessed high levels of "technological asymmetry", then it would have been able to inflict heavy damage on Pakistan during its unsuccessful aerial raid on February 27, according to an IAF report.

The report analysed various aspects of IAF's air strike on a Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) terrorist training camp in Pakistan's Balakot on February 26 and the subsequent Pakistani retaliation the next day.

India carried out the air strike to avenge the Pulwama attack in which 40 CRPF personnel were killed.

In the report, the IAF said Pakistan Air Force has been consistently enhancing its air defence and offensive capabilities since the Kargil war in 1999 and there was a need for India to bolster its "technological asymmetry" for aerial combat, official sources said sharing details from the report.

At present, Pakistan has some edge with its fleet of F-16 jets with AMRAAM missile fitted with them, said an official.

The sources said the planned induction of Rafale aircraft with deadly Meteor beyond-visual-range air-to-air missile (BVRAAM) and S-400 air defence missile system will provide India with a significant advantage over Pakistani Air Force.

"We felt we could not punish the adversaries appropriately. So we need to bolster technological asymmetry so that the enemy does not even dare to come close to the border," said a source.

On the Balakot strikes, the report said the Israeli Spice 2000 precision guided munitions (PGM) fired from Mirage 2000 jets hit five out of the six designated targets in the JeM training facility. However, one Spice PGM did not leave the aircraft because of a drift in the inertial navigation system.

The report said the deception used was successful as Pakistan was caught off guard despite their air force being put on highest alert.

Various packages of jets flew in several directions including a fleet of Jaguars went towards Bahawalpur, a key air base of Pakistan Air Force, sources said.

In the list of positives from the strike, the IAF talked about accuracy of intelligence inputs, a precise selection of targets, demonstration of its ability to carry out precision strikes and its success in maintaining the secrecy of the operation though over 6,000 personnel were involved in it.

In its analysis of possible areas for improvement, the IAF sought superior technological asymmetry and air defence system over Pakistan, sources said.

It also talked about the need for procuring new weapons and other platforms for enhancing the IAF's overall combat capabilities.

Induction of Rafale jets along with Meteor beyond-visual-range missile and S-400 air defence missile system will provide India with an edge over Pakistan, according to the report.

India is procuring a batch of S-400 air defence system from Russia at a cost of USD 5 billion. India is also buying 36 Rafale fighter jets from France at a cost of Rs 58,000 crore.

READ | Amid Security Concerns, IAF Transfers Wing Commander Abhinandan From Srinagar

During the aerial combat of February 27, IAF pilot Abhinandan Varthaman had engaged with one of the Pakistani F-16s and shot it down before his Mig-21 Bison was downed.

Varthaman was captured by Pakistan and was released after spending nearly 60 hours in Pakistani custody.

The Indian Air Force had on February 28 displayed pieces of an AMRAAM missile, fired by a Pakistani F-16, as evidence to prove that Pakistan deployed the US-manufactured fighter jets during the raid.
 
I heard from someone that some of our bombs did not have fuses thus did not explode. If intentional its a very smart thing to do.
 
Oh so now you're trying to be the owner sending out invites? :laughcry:
Not quite but as the saying goes, don't like the heat stay out of the kitchen.
Anyone can spend all their time posting pics, vids and gain 'credibility' fast. Most Pakistanis have some sort of connection with the armed forces and then sadly try to act like bigwigs with fancy words and text. Clearly, as this thread demonstrates (as many others do), people just post on a whim and try to act clever, then others come along and contradict them. Obviously they can't all be right? So most, if not all, are just talking BS.

I'd like to see these 'credible' people get out of their comfort zone and post on independent forums like Keymags, F-16.net or even the air combat information group where their technical knowledge, analytical, argumentive skills and sources will get tested to the bare extreme. Rest assured, they will get shot down and exposed in seconds. One guy from this very forum, who seems to have some kind of credibility recently got torn apart on F-16.net by an investigative journalist.
I know of at least five retired PAF personal who either post on this forum or just read the contents, who are much more credible than you on any given day.....and how do you know some of the members from say this forum don't post on the sites you mentioned, surely your folks don't say, hey Tom Cruise, fetch my slippers....so it's not necessary people use same user name elsewhere. :cheesy:
 
I heard from someone that some of our bombs did not have fuses thus did not explode. If intentional its a very smart thing to do.
No our SOWs are not duds....

One exploded middle of Div H.Q lawn and Gen Bipin was there and that is why for many days he didn't came out in public some says he was diagnosed acute diarrhea....:lol:
 
No our SOWs are not duds....

One exploded middle of Div H.Q lawn and Gen Bipin was there and that is why for many days he didn't came out in public some says he was diagnosed acute diarrhea....:lol:
And how you know that Bipin was there,speculating @Maarkhoor o_O
 
Pakistan is periodically humiliating India by releasing news, bits and statements about the operation making sure India never comes out of its nightmares. Good! Keep reminding them their defeat for the next 20 years, or may be 25 - or perhaps never stop.
 
Last edited:
They can lie and deny all they want, painfull as it is for them the truth will come from their own mouths. Apart from the F-16 shot down bull crap tagged on the end some interesting admissions. How stupid can they get - on the one hand they are saying the hit 5 out of 6 targets and on the other admitting the strike was a failure!!? On the one hand they claim to have shot down an F16 and on the other cry about how they were not able to match PAF's tech!!? This is what happens when you lie, inbetween your lies are bits of truth, so the end story just doesn't hang together, unless you're a Modi lover in which case you will believe anything he says...…………

We Could Have Inflicted Heavy Damage On Pakistan During Aerial Raid If We Had 'tech Asymmetry': IAF
Written By Press Trust Of India | Mumbai | Published: April 25, 2019 18:12 IST
Hack:
  • As per an IAF report, if the Indian Air Force possessed high levels of 'technological asymmetry' then it would have been able to inflict heavy damage on Pakistan
  • The IAF had carried out an aerial raid on Pakistan on February 27, however, it was an unsuccessful one
  • The report analysed various aspects of IAF's air strike on a Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) terrorist training camp in Pakistan's Balakot on February 26

If the Indian Air Force possessed high levels of "technological asymmetry", then it would have been able to inflict heavy damage on Pakistan during its unsuccessful aerial raid on February 27, according to an IAF report.

The report analysed various aspects of IAF's air strike on a Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) terrorist training camp in Pakistan's Balakot on February 26 and the subsequent Pakistani retaliation the next day.

India carried out the air strike to avenge the Pulwama attack in which 40 CRPF personnel were killed.

In the report, the IAF said Pakistan Air Force has been consistently enhancing its air defence and offensive capabilities since the Kargil war in 1999 and there was a need for India to bolster its "technological asymmetry" for aerial combat, official sources said sharing details from the report.

At present, Pakistan has some edge with its fleet of F-16 jets with AMRAAM missile fitted with them, said an official.

The sources said the planned induction of Rafale aircraft with deadly Meteor beyond-visual-range air-to-air missile (BVRAAM) and S-400 air defence missile system will provide India with a significant advantage over Pakistani Air Force.

"We felt we could not punish the adversaries appropriately. So we need to bolster technological asymmetry so that the enemy does not even dare to come close to the border," said a source.

On the Balakot strikes, the report said the Israeli Spice 2000 precision guided munitions (PGM) fired from Mirage 2000 jets hit five out of the six designated targets in the JeM training facility. However, one Spice PGM did not leave the aircraft because of a drift in the inertial navigation system.

The report said the deception used was successful as Pakistan was caught off guard despite their air force being put on highest alert.

Various packages of jets flew in several directions including a fleet of Jaguars went towards Bahawalpur, a key air base of Pakistan Air Force, sources said.

In the list of positives from the strike, the IAF talked about accuracy of intelligence inputs, a precise selection of targets, demonstration of its ability to carry out precision strikes and its success in maintaining the secrecy of the operation though over 6,000 personnel were involved in it.

In its analysis of possible areas for improvement, the IAF sought superior technological asymmetry and air defence system over Pakistan, sources said.

It also talked about the need for procuring new weapons and other platforms for enhancing the IAF's overall combat capabilities.

Induction of Rafale jets along with Meteor beyond-visual-range missile and S-400 air defence missile system will provide India with an edge over Pakistan, according to the report.

India is procuring a batch of S-400 air defence system from Russia at a cost of USD 5 billion. India is also buying 36 Rafale fighter jets from France at a cost of Rs 58,000 crore.

READ | Amid Security Concerns, IAF Transfers Wing Commander Abhinandan From Srinagar

During the aerial combat of February 27, IAF pilot Abhinandan Varthaman had engaged with one of the Pakistani F-16s and shot it down before his Mig-21 Bison was downed.

Varthaman was captured by Pakistan and was released after spending nearly 60 hours in Pakistani custody.

The Indian Air Force had on February 28 displayed pieces of an AMRAAM missile, fired by a Pakistani F-16, as evidence to prove that Pakistan deployed the US-manufactured fighter jets during the raid.

LOL

The Indian Air Force still sticking to its internationally debunked myths. This is some next level Baghdad Bob stuff.
 
Not quite but as the saying goes, don't like the heat stay out of the kitchen.
I know of at least five retired PAF personal who either post on this forum or just read the contents, who are much more credible than you on any given day.....and how do you know some of the members from say this forum don't post on the sites you mentioned, surely your folks don't say, hey Tom Cruise, fetch my slippers....so it's not necessary people use same user name elsewhere. :cheesy:
Well duh, of course, any PAF personnel would have far more credibility than anyone on here. They probably read the contents for a laugh and I doubt they would waste time talking to charlatans posing as armchair generals.
And going by some of childish argumentive skills I've witnessed on other forums, yes, I am quite sure some from here do venture outside. Needless to say they don't last very long when challenged.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom