Sinhala Buddhist mob attacks Muslim Prayer

[HeinzG]

Dutugamunu own admission it should be millions not 60,000 !!



The Victory of Duttha Gamani - king Dutthagamani and Elara

Dutugamunu can admit anything because there was no proper census.

the army of Elara were Damilas(Tamils) , there were no invaders, the purpose of the war was to defeat the Tamils and unite the country

source : The Victory of Duttha Gamani - king Dutthagamani and Elara

How can you say Elara was no invader. Prove that he is no invader but a local Hindu king.

The word Demala or Dameda according to the Sinhala source does not imply Tamils only. It implies to the Dravida clan such as Tamils, Kannada, Malayali etc.

Moreover most of the soldiers and generals of the Elara's army was Sinhalese.

 

[Azizam]

Dutugamunu own admission it should be millions not 60,000 !!



The Victory of Duttha Gamani - king Dutthagamani and Elara



the army of Elara were Damilas(Tamils) , there were no invaders, the purpose of the war was to defeat the Tamils and unite the country





source : The Victory of Duttha Gamani - king Dutthagamani and Elara

Mate, put your childish fantasies apart and use some of your brain cells.

 

[manlion]

How can you say Elara was no invader. Prove that he is no invader but a local Hindu king.

The word Demala or Dameda according to the Sinhala source does not imply Tamils only. It implies to the Dravida clan such as Tamils, Kannada, Malayali etc.

Moreover most of the soldiers and generals of the Elara's army was Sinhalese.

thats your concoction, however in the Mahavamsa, Dutugamunu had to conquer 32 Tamil Chieftains in Anuradhapura. If there were 32 Tamil chieftains in the Anuradhapura region, it proves the existence of Tamil settlements. This logically implies Tamils were not invaders

 

[Mritunjaya]

lol.
How is Ravana Tamil?

....he is just trolling

.....I really wish some Sri Lankan here would tell us what Balaya mean. Curious to know .......hope they don't take to kidnapping other people's wives ...LOL

 

[livingdead]

....he is just trolling

.....I really wish some Sri Lankan here would tell us what Balaya mean. Curious to know .......hope they don't take to kidnapping other people's wives ...LOL

 

[ExtraOdinary]

Hope SriLanka investigate indian (and US for that matter) instigation in such attack to create internal conflict. Since civil war ended India was throwing everything at SriLanka to stop Chinese engagement. Now it is more than clear indians are exploiting some buhhidist connection (along with Dalai gang sheltered in india) to create such conflict. Same situation was created in Myanmar where both india and US are involved to sideline Chinese influence.

yes sir I agree, there is 99% probability of RAW involvement in this, these baniya indians are so evil with their chanakyan intentions.

 

[HeinzG]

thats your concoction, however in the Mahavamsa, Dutugamunu had to conquer 32 Tamil Chieftains in Anuradhapura. If there were 32 Tamil chieftains in the Anuradhapura region, it proves the existence of Tamil settlements. This logically implies Tamils were not invaders

The saying goes for 32 Tamil chieftains, that doesn't mean the subjects of the chieftains were Tamils. If Tamils were living in A-pura historically where was there places of worship? Where was there artifacts? The oldest Hindu artifacts of Sri Lanka dates to the 12 century the time of the Cholas and the monuments they have left behind in Polonnaruwa.

 

[Mritunjaya]

.... ..........which is why my first guess was that 'Ravana Balaya' could mean 'sons of Ravana'.

...are you Telegu ?

 

[manlion]

The saying goes for 32 Tamil chieftains, that doesn't mean the subjects of the chieftains were Tamils.

The presence of Tamils in Lanka in the early historic period is accepted in the Pali chronicles and according to contemporary historian Prof Sudarshan Seneviratne

“there is no mention of the word Sihala or Sinhala ethnicity in the thousand odd short inscriptions that come to us from this period, but on the contrary, a vast majority of the host of clan names and titles that we come across in these inscriptions only show affinities with the clans of the ancient Tamil country”

.

If Tamils were living in A-pura historically where was there places of worship? Where was there artifacts? The oldest Hindu artifacts of Sri Lanka dates to the 12 century the time of the Cholas and the monuments they have left behind in Polonnaruwa.

Tamils were also ex Buddhista and Jains esp the Pandyas as such the early artifacts could be trace to Tamil Buddhist and the early historical inscription were in the South Indian Brahmi script and not Sinhala script

 

[jayron]

....he is just trolling

.....I really wish some Sri Lankan here would tell us what Balaya mean. Curious to know .......hope they don't take to kidnapping other people's wives ...LOL

Tamil revisionists do have a theory that Ravana was a Tamil and so were the Asuras. It is a revisionist theory linking aryan invasion theory with mythology.

 

[jayron]

@Skyline, why do (some) SL Buddhists feel threatned by Muslims? Do Muslims do anything to tick them off?

Is it conversions? Then aren't the christians doing it very very successfully in SL compared to Muslims?

I always thought SL Muslims were totally chilled out (just like most SL ppl). Heck they even happily sing Namo Namo Matha as part of your anthem, something Indian Muslims just won't do. Or are they also getting influenced by the pure wahhabi strain lately and if yes, to what degree?

The problem lies more with SL buddhist monks than Lankan muslims. You will notice this phenomenon in countries with Teravada buddhism . They are more extremist and involved in politics. Eg: Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia.

 

[Neuro]

We expected this gud news .....more about to come,wait and see.

 

[@nline]

.........the muslims are now feeling the heat. Karma is a bic*h

Moderators, have a look at this poor guy`s post.

 

[oFFbEAT]

Its so sad.. buddists attacking muslims... are not buddists supposed to be peaceful?

Yeah it doesn't seem 'normal'........it should have been the other way round.....isn't it?

 

[oFFbEAT]

How come in Hindi they drop the last vowel. For example, karma is pronounced karm, Vedas pronounces as Ved, etc?

It's the other way round.....in English they always add a vowel...
Karm, Dharm, Ved....these are not English words.....
We should discard the practice of adding an extra 'a' in sanskrit words.....